1. LOVE!FOR!YOU! (4.41 stars, 1044 notes)

monstrata__ ZZHBOY _ smallboat___x2

Video +18 WARNING

StarrStyx wrote:

Fatfan Kolek wrote:

03:10:876 (2) - those are 3/8, not 1/3
03:14:304 (2) - also 3/8, not 1/2
03:15:697 (4) - there is no sound
03:17:733 (2) - 3/8
03:19:125 (4) - no sound
03:20:733 (1) - this slider should end on the red tick on 03:20:947 - because of the voice
03:21:697 (2,4) - overmap, no sound there
03:22:554 (4) - ^
03:24:590 (2) - 3/8
03:25:983 (4) - no sound
03:26:197 - why is this blank? D: you've missed a sound here
03:28:019 (2) - 3/8
03:29:412 (4) - no sound
03:31:447 (2) - 3/8
03:32:840 (4) - no sound
03:33:054 - sound you've missed
03:34:876 (2) - 3/8
03:36:269 (4) - no sound
03:39:162 (3) - 3/8
03:42:590 (2) - 3/8
03:45:162 (2) - 3/8
03:46:554 (4) - no sound
03:48:590 (2) - 3/8
03:49:983 (4) - no sound
03:52:876 (3) - 3/8
03:59:733 (3) - 3/8
04:03:162 (3) - there is actually no 3/8 or 1/3 sound

just pointing these things out for you, no kds pls
no speedrank pl0x

Mofu kun wrote:

lewd

mod

[General]
not sure whether feat. daoko should be in the artist section or the title section, feel free to correct me.
the complete silence during the outro could be cropped out. should be fine abuot the metadata
[Fallen Love]
00:26:676 (3) - make the curve on this slider a little bit more extreme. to me, it feels like it sends the cursors on a downward angle, which makes it awkward to move to the next slider. fixed
00:28:476 (3) - this note feels like it’s in a fairly awkward place, i think that it should be moved either to the middle, straight with the slider, or off to the right, so that it flows into the next slider. fixed
00:47:316 (1) - make the slider curve up, toward the next slider, instead of down. just minor flow reasons. the flow seems fine to me, and 00:47:316 (1,5), if you know what i mean
00:49:476 (2) - i think that this should be made the start of the NC instead of the previous note. i think that because the slider is part of the vocals, instead of the bgm, the NC should be representative of this. there is downbeat :p
01:10:716 (2) - move this note up a little bit. i think that the current placement of the note makes the cursor go down and away from the next slider. just because i don't want it to be very flow
01:15:636 (1,2,3) - the spacing here feels a bit too far for what isn’t that strong of a noise that it’s being mapped to. i think that it should be lowered. It is, but I want to make difference with previous 3 notes, so I increased the ds
01:37:724 (5) - it sounds like the vocal o- syllable starts at the sliderend, and that the sliderstart is mapped to silence (or that guitar chord). i think that this slider should instead be turned into a note at 01:37:890. then the gap leave there will be weird
01:54:724 (6) - make part of the purple NC, as it is part of the vocals, i think that it should be grouped along with the notes that are mapped to the vocals for this portion. fixed
01:56:890 (6) - i think this note should be removed because it isn’t mapped to a point in the vocals. there is vocal .-.
02:24:724 - i think a spinner could be placed here. the slow rise of the cymbal noise could be a place for the spinner. Dont feel like I am going to place one tho :cc
03:11:840 - here, the vocal syllables continue, but there is a break in the stream, making a discrepancy between the two. because of this, i think that a note should be added here. tbh, it dont follow either the vocal or bgm, but the rhythm only, I don't know if it is fine or not but i will just keep it first
03:46:126 - ^
04:38:083 (1,2,3,4) - the spacing here feels like it is too far for the strength of the song here. i think that it should be lowered. It is quite strong imo
04:58:878 (5) - i think that this should be moved a very tiny little bit to the right so that it points directly at the following slider. (this is really minor though.) should be fine
05:08:083 (1,1) - while this patterning looks unique and interesting, to me, it doesn’t make much sense to have the final note of 5 identical sounds be a NC. maybe instead the ¼ long sliders could be the NC starters for the streams.

dude this map plays so well

z1085684963 wrote:

hi

• Fallen Love

1. 00:30:516 (4,5) - ctrl+g? 不用了o.o
2. 00:55:116我觉得可以在这里加个转盘 我覺得不太需要
3. 01:00:756 (1) - 加一点向左的弧度？在跟00:59:076 (2) 平衡啦ww
4. 01:21:396 (2) - ctrl+g? flow怪怪的
5. 02:54:162 (1) - 个人感觉拉两个长条还不如一个转盘好 轉盤也太沒特色=w=
6. 03:09:590 (1) - 噫，超市爷爷好可怕;w; ;w;w;???
7. 03:11:304 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - hitnormal的存在感还是太低了，建议这种全部加上normal的whistle 這樣我覺得就可以了
8. 04:14:447 (1,2) - ctrl+g? why .-.-.-.
9. 04:18:992 (2,1,3) - Delete 不了,空著太怪

超市神马破
vidoe

StarForYou wrote:

As your request

[General]
-Fine

[FALLEN LOVE!]
-00:06:516 (3,1) - Don't you think the flow is really weird o.o? LowBPM should be fine o.o
-00:20:196 (6) - This should be placed further, it can match more the rhythm imo no spaced stream
-00:25:116 (5) - Why not move this right more a bit to attach more flow fixed
-00:34:836 (1,2,3,4) - Curved stream shape is better because it can match more the flow style ww
-00:42:036 (3,4,5) - Why not move 00:42:396 (5) - right a bit to match the flow constructed at 00:42:036 (3) - yea still style. just want something linear o3o
-01:14:196 (1,2,3) - This is really hard to read tbh, because their distance is very similar but the rhythm is different fixed
-01:15:156 (1,3,2) - The perfection of this triangle can be improved fixed
-01:15:316 (2,1,3) - ^ fixed
-01:16:476 (2) - Why not put this note under 01:16:596 (3) - because the flow is really strange... style
-01:17:076 (1,2,3) - The perfection of this triangle can be improved fixed
-01:17:236 (2,1,3) - As well (Sorry for triangle nazi wwww) fixed
-01:18:036 (1,2,3) - Mentioned before, maybe try to make a more obvious distance to let players distinguish the rhythm easily fixed
-01:20:836 Why not map this downbeat lol The rhythm will be more cool should be fine ww
-01:29:076 (1,2) - Humm I think using note can emphasize the rhythm a lot better so many notes :<
-02:32:390 (1) - Why...why not use a decelerated slider to replace the spinner? too lazy to think slider shape (:3 [ ]
-02:54:162 (1) - I think you should consider to mute the slider end, the sound makes weird it is fine i think
-02:55:876 (1) - As well
-03:02:733 (1) - ^
-03:11:840 This sound is so lonely do you know huh I follow bgm
-03:12:590 (6) - Maybe place a bit near? The sudden big distance is weird but there is no special sound can be emphasized check that ds = w=
-Holy god Electroic part J die me
-That's all
-Damn it so aweesome no
-Please firetrucking rank it approve

1. use the 44byte blank hitsound for your sliderslide (search "blank" on the ranking criteria)
2. a couple hitsounds that have slight delays. would be nice to get rid of those, especially the ones used as hitnormals
3. are hitsounds incomplete or something? like the first kiai are missing out on the super loud beat 1 and 3 kicks, the second kiai has kicks on 2 and 4 while the song has them on all white ticks, the first bpm change section could easily emphasize more than just claps since there's a buttload of loud stuff, third kiai is missing out on claps and kicks everywhere, yeayeayeaetc.
4. also related to hitsounds: pitched hitsounding like 02:05:724 (1) - should be backed by a non-pitch-matching hitnormal of some kind. if the sound is exactly matching the music, feedback is minimal. there's also some other hitsounds that i'd think should be more audible, but these ones are the most important for sure
5. .osb tho
   --
6. 00:32:796 (5,1) - not understanding why both of these have stronger sounds on their tails than heads, both in instrumentals and vocals. if it's for the sake of variety, do so without contradicting the music (so no passive sliders ya)
7. 01:33:724 - volumezzz
8. 01:35:390 (5) - same idea as earlier, except this one is like only vocals, which are emphasizing the blue ticks. your rhythm isn't. this or something with similar points of importance works fine
9. 01:47:557 (2,3) - so this is supposed to be reflective of 01:48:390 (4,5) - i assume (which is why they're copy paste), but their timeline placement is fucked. just like how the vocal thing starts on a white tick at 01:48:390 (4) - , it shouhld start on a white tick for 2 as well at 01:47:724 - , not the blue tick before it. rhythm between 1 and 2 probably would need to be changed along with 3->4 spacing
10. 01:49:724 (1,2) - spacing between these should be larger. could easily be confused for 1/4 spacing even in regularly distance snapped areas, but is especially confusing after a 1/4 jump much larger than this. spaicng it around 1.7x (since that's the constant ds for 1/4 stuff) or higher would be a lot easier to interpret
11. 02:54:162 (1,1) - using the same slidershape for two completely different things in the music is pretty... lame i guess. it's just not really matching the music to the fullest
12. 02:57:590 (2) - way better as 2 circles since the second drumhit is louder than the first byfar
13. 02:58:447 (5,6) - placement as it is now is giving like no emphasis to 6, whereas it deserves just as much as 5 (since they're like the same sound). spacing more from 5->6 = good idea
14. 03:13:019 (1,2,1) - lol at least differnetiate 1/4 and 1/2 spacing. having them back to back as like almost the same thing is really misleading. the same thing happens in other places throughout this section (makign your 1/2 spacing look more like 1/4). 03:16:447 (1,2,1) - is like what spacing should be for this kind of stuff
15. 03:15:590 (3) - nice offscreen slider bro
16. 03:41:197 (2) - 03:51:483 (2) - 03:54:912 (2) - 03:58:340 (2) - 04:01:769 (2) - all of these have irrelevant sounds on heads and super loud stuff on tails. i get you're trying to do super cool slider wub gameplay, but if it's not followign the song it's just nonsense
17. 04:00:162 (1,2,3,4) - movement here is pretty awkward due to how linear yet inconsistently spaced. using sharper angles between objects would work best. i don't know how it would be possible for object arrangements, but more consistent linear spacing would also work as well
18. 04:11:492 (2,3) - putting clickable things on each loud synth thing sounds way better than having sliderhead+tail covered, especially for the last one, which is held out longer than the others. par exemplethis is cool
19. 05:03:424 (4) - while there is a sound on the head here, the one on the tail is definitely more powerful. passive slider blablabla ive said it too many times so far. the same blue tick soudn is on 05:03:765 (5) - as well, whcih you aren't emphasizing with a head, so it's like inconsistent too ?!??! yeahyoea toidsfjkfdsfdsfok
20. 05:10:810 (1) - i hear what you're mapping, but it's not nearly as noticeable as what was being mapped right before this. anyone listening will be paying attention to the double stuff at 05:10:128 (2,3,4,5) - and will be expecting a click on the blue tick at 05:10:924 - . current rhythm ignores the main whatever sounds mapped before, which is pretty awk. this would work well

1. 00:09:876 (3) - this is a little better on the red tick where 2 is so that it follows the high pitched w/e instrument instead of the quiet bass thump which is a very marginal sound in comparison, every other slider in this section follows this sound anyways
2. 00:13:956 (2,3) - It feels really weird to have no spacing here even though there was a jump here 00:12:996 (2,3) - and they're pretty much the same sounds
3. 00:30:756 (6) - Why is this slider on such a weak beat when there's stronger beats 00:30:516 and 00:30:996 that don't have one? I get you mapped the vocal (i think?) but it's just not as significant as the loud snare and bass hits that you've mapped with previous 1/4 sliders, and right now there is zero emphasis on the snare hit
4. 00:31:236 (3) - Rather have the end clickable like you did with every other clap/clap rhythm in this section
5. 00:32:796 (5,1) - These 1/4's starting on the blue tick makes me kinda sad ;-;
6. 00:35:316 (5,1) - I don't like these being the same slider since they're different sounds, but it looks like you did it for the pattern so idk if you want to change it
7. 00:40:836 (6) - This is the only slider that seems to follow the vocal in this section and ignores the importance of that snare drum at the end of it. Either delete 5 and start this there + circle or make it a 1/4+circle. None of your other sliders in this part clearly follow the vocals (except at the end obv)
8. 01:47:557 (2,3) - 1/4 starting on blues again Except this was really rly awkward to play, you could move thesse two to a tick earlier and place a circle after otherwise you miss the start of the vocal and also have the sliders end on the strong one
9. 01:55:057 (1) - Could be a 1/4 slider + circle instead as there's a pretty clear syllable on the red as well as a bass drum quadruplet here, and it emphasizes the start of this new measure a lot more
10. 02:16:390 (1) - imo this looks better without the red node at the top right if you intend on having a smooth curve or pulling it out more if you want an angle, rather than this best of both worlds it's currently at
    
    SPOILER

    
    SPOILER

    
    every other slider is amazing tho
    
11. 02:32:390 (1) - awwww I expected another amazing slider here. This spinner doesn't really represent the music well either since there's not really a buildup or a decrease in sound and it actually ignores a fairly significant beat here 02:35:057 which could also have a slider on it
12. 02:54:162 (1,1) - I guess you got lazy with the slider art here?? They're totally different sounds yet they're the same slider. If you change them then you should change the first since the second is (essentially) the same sound as 03:02:733 (1) -
13. 04:47:174 (1,2) - I think this is a little better as circle-circle-1/4 otherwise you miss the hi-hat + vocal on the red tick, and this slider isn't really following anything anyways
14. 05:12:628 (4) - the spacing for this slider and only this slider is way larger than all the other ones mapped in this section with the exact same sound 05:14:447 (4,4,4,4) -

Synpoo wrote:

hello, from your queue

[FALLEN LOVE!]

1. 00:09:876 (3) - this is a little better on the red tick where 2 is so that it follows the high pitched w/e instrument instead of the quiet bass thump which is a very marginal sound in comparison, every other slider in this section follows this sound anyways
2. 00:13:956 (2,3) - It feels really weird to have no spacing here even though there was a jump here 00:12:996 (2,3) - and they're pretty much the same sounds This should be fine
3. 00:30:756 (6) - Why is this slider on such a weak beat when there's stronger beats 00:30:516 and 00:30:996 that don't have one? I get you mapped the vocal (i think?) but it's just not as significant as the loud snare and bass hits that you've mapped with previous 1/4 sliders, and right now there is zero emphasis on the snare hit Generally two note can represent more stronger music while the slider end can't
4. 00:31:236 (3) - Rather have the end clickable like you did with every other clap/clap rhythm in this section
5. 00:32:796 (5,1) - These 1/4's starting on the blue tick makes me kinda sad ;-; fixed in last mod
6. 00:35:316 (5,1) - I don't like these being the same slider since they're different sounds, but it looks like you did it for the pattern so idk if you want to change it yea for patterns :/
7. 00:40:836 (6) - This is the only slider that seems to follow the vocal in this section and ignores the importance of that snare drum at the end of it. Either delete 5 and start this there + circle or make it a 1/4+circle. None of your other sliders in this part clearly follow the vocals (except at the end obv)
8. 01:47:557 (2,3) - 1/4 starting on blues again Except this was really rly awkward to play, you could move thesse two to a tick earlier and place a circle after otherwise you miss the start of the vocal and also have the sliders end on the strong one
9. 01:55:057 (1) - Could be a 1/4 slider + circle instead as there's a pretty clear syllable on the red as well as a bass drum quadruplet here, and it emphasizes the start of this new measure a lot more I prefer a more simple rhythm here as the music is soft
10. 02:16:390 (1) - imo this looks better without the red node at the top right if you intend on having a smooth curve or pulling it out more if you want an angle, rather than this best of both worlds it's currently at
    
    SPOILER

    
    SPOILER

    
    every other slider is amazing tho
    
11. 02:32:390 (1) - awwww I expected another amazing slider here. This spinner doesn't really represent the music well either since there's not really a buildup or a decrease in sound and it actually ignores a fairly significant beat here 02:35:057 which could also have a slider on it too lazy ;A;
12. 02:54:162 (1,1) - I guess you got lazy with the slider art here?? They're totally different sounds yet they're the same slider. If you change them then you should change the first since the second is (essentially) the same sound as 03:02:733 (1) -
13. 04:47:174 (1,2) - I think this is a little better as circle-circle-1/4 otherwise you miss the hi-hat + vocal on the red tick, and this slider isn't really following anything anyways I prefer following vocal here >_>
14. 05:12:628 (4) - the spacing for this slider and only this slider is way larger than all the other ones mapped in this section with the exact same sound 05:14:447 (4,4,4,4) -

1. osb
2. 00:05:076 (1) - I always say this just because it's such an easy fix: Change the combo color to something non-blue so it'll be much easier to read on the default skin. 03:08:733 (1) - You could apply this here too.
3. 00:06:516 (3,1) - Is this jump necessary? It's the intro and your jump on 00:10:356 (3,1) - isn't even that big or flow-breaking.
4. 00:22:116 (1,2) - Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm makes a lot more sense to me. 00:22:356 - Is an important beat and you decide to make the blue tick clickable instead which is kinda odd.
5. 00:27:156 (5) - Going by your NC pattern, you should NC here, 00:27:876 (1) - Remove the NC here, and NC 00:28:116 (2) - instead.
6. 00:51:156 (1) - Cool (btw there's a really simple way to make loop designs using only 3 grey control points and 2 red control points lol)
7. 01:02:556 (4,1) - This is such a big jump The spacing is too big that it can be misread as 1/2 or 1/3... Make it smaller please, like your other 1/4 jumps.
8. 01:33:724 - Useless green line here.
9. 02:11:057 (1) - Idk man, this slider just looks weird ;__;
10. 02:28:390 (4,5) - I preferred the rhythm you used for: 02:31:057 (4,5) - . It's a 1/1 gap which is better imo. it's kind of strange to start the slider on a blue tick (even tho there is a vocal) and end on the drum beat at 02:29:057 - .
11. 05:05:810 (1,2,3,4,1) - 05:07:628 (1,2,3,4,5) - Looks like an NC pattern inconsistency here. Can you double check.

monstrata wrote:

[FALLEN LOVE]

1. osb
2. 00:05:076 (1) - I always say this just because it's such an easy fix: Change the combo color to something non-blue so it'll be much easier to read on the default skin. 03:08:733 (1) - You could apply this here too.
3. 00:06:516 (3,1) - Is this jump necessary? It's the intro and your jump on 00:10:356 (3,1) - isn't even that big or flow-breaking.
4. 00:22:116 (1,2) - Ctrl+G'ing this rhythm makes a lot more sense to me. 00:22:356 - Is an important beat and you decide to make the blue tick clickable instead which is kinda odd.
5. 00:27:156 (5) - Going by your NC pattern, you should NC here, 00:27:876 (1) - Remove the NC here, and NC 00:28:116 (2) - instead.
6. 00:51:156 (1) - Cool (btw there's a really simple way to make loop designs using only 3 grey control points and 2 red control points lol)
7. 01:02:556 (4,1) - This is such a big jump The spacing is too big that it can be misread as 1/2 or 1/3... Make it smaller please, like your other 1/4 jumps.
8. 01:33:724 - Useless green line here.
9. 02:11:057 (1) - Idk man, this slider just looks weird ;__; I think it is fine ;__;
10. 02:28:390 (4,5) - I preferred the rhythm you used for: 02:31:057 (4,5) - . It's a 1/1 gap which is better imo. it's kind of strange to start the slider on a blue tick (even tho there is a vocal) and end on the drum beat at 02:29:057 - .
11. 05:05:810 (1,2,3,4,1) - 05:07:628 (1,2,3,4,5) - Looks like an NC pattern inconsistency here. Can you double check.

monstrata wrote:

#1 Good job .