1. World's End (5.27 stars, 1102 notes)

pkk wrote:

DJPAN

pkhg wrote:

i was expecting a cute ruko/tama bg ;w;

1. Your soft-hitclap.wav is too short, and it is delayed for over 5ms. Fixed for you:http://puu.sh/h90nK/22ec20e8a6.wav
   
   

   Ranking Criteria wrote:

   Every .wav file must be at least 100ms long.
   Hitsounds must have an acceptable range of delay under 5ms, unless there's a special purpose.

1. 00:21:027 (1,1,1) - I know why are you using them, however consider the wub-wub sound here is too soft, you may decrease the distance between sliders.
2. 00:21:542 (1) - Split it into a extended slider and a note in order to provide a good feedback of hit.
3. 01:07:827 (4) - miss a lot of vocal here, not recommended
4. 01:24:113 (1) - You may change the slider pattern because vocal here is tremulous, I consider multi-red-grid slider fits here.
5. 01:35:256 (1) - gonna more crazy here? 2* 1/8 sliders? hahaha I'm joking 04:37:656 (1) - same
6. 01:43:827 (3) - I consider 2* 1/4 sliders follow better here.
7. 01:47:599 (1,1,2,1,2,1) - Cool here.
8. 02:38:856 (1) - Maybe not need NC here.
9. 03:22:056 (2,3,1) - Vocal is higher, but your distance is shorter.
10. 04:40:056 (1) - This slider is easily to mislead player because of its similiar placement with 04:39:542 (1,2,3) - , suggest to change a place or pattern here.

[Teichan] wrote:

M4M here, all suggestions as I consider that this map is great.

[General]

1. Your soft-hitclap.wav is too short, and it is delayed for over 5ms. Fixed for you:http://puu.sh/h90nK/22ec20e8a6.wav
   
   

   Ranking Criteria wrote:

   Every .wav file must be at least 100ms long.
   Hitsounds must have an acceptable range of delay under 5ms, unless there's a special purpose.

[World End]

1. 00:21:027 (1,1,1) - I know why are you using them, however consider the wub-wub sound here is too soft, you may decrease the distance between sliders. I will think about this but for me, I'm still think that wubwub is strong enough to make like this. this is interesting
2. 00:21:542 (1) - Split it into a extended slider and a note in order to provide a good feedback of hit. mhmm I tried what you say but I think it's a bit rush for calm part, will look for more opinion.
3. 01:07:827 (4) - miss a lot of vocal here, not recommended this is calm part so sometimes I use tail or reverse to emphasis vocal.
4. 01:24:113 (1) - You may change the slider pattern because vocal here is tremulous, I consider multi-red-grid slider fits here. I think curve is fit here, will look for more opinion for this.
5. 01:35:256 (1) - gonna more crazy here? 2* 1/8 sliders? hahaha I'm joking 04:37:656 (1) - same lol, you know I'm also thinking about that but it's too hard and I think 2 1/4 slider is fit. 2 1/8 will ruin the pattern imo.
6. 01:43:827 (3) - I consider 2* 1/4 sliders follow better here. alright, I tried this.
7. 01:47:599 (1,1,2,1,2,1) - Cool here.
8. 02:38:856 (1) - Maybe not need NC here. ok removed.
9. 03:22:056 (2,3,1) - Vocal is higher, but your distance is shorter. I prefer consistent there and make slider speed up to emphasis vocal.
10. 04:40:056 (1) - This slider is easily to mislead player because of its similiar placement with 04:39:542 (1,2,3) - , suggest to change a place or pattern here. tried.

Awesome song and map, take my star!

pkk wrote:

DJPAN

1. 02:38:342 (11) - up a bit
2. 03:57:542 (1) - that slider at below one needs higher a bit
3. 04:55:142 (1) - up a bit

1. I commend you use 2 slider tick rate in this map. It s fitter this song in my opinion. But that ll be increase the odds of slider miss. so up to you.
2. 00:01:999 (3,4) - If i were you , i ll ctrl + G here to fit scale.
3. 00:04:742 (3,4) - ^
4. 02:18:627 - 02:28:742 I just think there has too many drum sounds on sliders end in this part, feel a little strange when i play that.I think there has more better way to note here, up to u.
5. 05:23:942 (1,2,3,4) - this part is fine for me since circles fit scale well here.
6. 05:32:170 (1,2,3,4) - I dont know if you r a mapper with attention to detail , plz reference 2nd commend.
7. above views r only for your reference, anyway, good job , wonderful mapset .
8. star for you

• 
  

1. Woah this cs 4.6 edge
2. The difficulty should be a lot more spread, tbh the only difficult parts were the chorus dnb areas which made this into a 5.27 star map and that shouldn't be the case when everything else is much much easier. Just too huge of a difficulty spike.
3. With DnB maps, you have a lot of potential to use some interesting slider but a lot of them are just curves. As a suggestion, you could change a few listed here: 01:14:342 (1) 01:24:113 (1) 01:39:370 (1)
4. at 03:57:542(1) At this point you had a lot of interesting sliders with the curved sliders. why not use them a bit more?
   
5. 00:23:599 (1) - 00:42:799 (1) You had that pre verse pump me up and leave with some kicksliders and I'm left to click white tick circles? Tbh there is a lot of potential to map the vocals here but I don't think just clicking white tick circles are fine. Either map the vocal or leave it as break time imo
6. 00:56:342 (1) ticks that should be filled IMO
7. 00:58:399 (1) ^ stack with 2 slider maybe?
8. 01:00:627 (1) Slowly increase distance between each note?
9. 01:20:342 (3) Flow might be a bit too basic here. Change it into something interesting with those 6 sliders. Make a pattern.
10. 01:30:799 (1) Adding NC's to the stream might make it look better.
11. 01:36:799 (1) SV change might be too large and becomes a huge difficulty spike. quick SV changes are great but it might be too large. You could lower the gap between? You can also just increase the base SV during the chorus.
12. 01:42:113 (1) ^
13. 01:43:485 (1) Something like this sv change is fine. Just an example
14. 01:37:999 (2) I don't think using distance gap circles is right here is the right idea. Just map it with mainly sliders and use circles sparingly unless used as streams. Most things said about this kiai time can be applied to the third kiai time too
15. End kiai here?
16. 01:57:199 (3,4) Weird slider placements. I dont think this placements looks the best
    
    SPOILER

    
    just make it flow and make it look good
17. 02:45:970 (5)
    
    SPOILER

    
    You have a lot of curved sliders like this. I should have mentioned something at the beginning. Either way its just a suggestion. I'm just not a fan of these really curved sliders
18. 03:08:685 (3) ^
19. 03:25:999 (1) - 03:29:942 (10) Again increasing circle gaps helps spread difficulty.
20. 04:27:713 (1,2) Weird Flow
21. 04:33:199 (1) NC's