Frey wrote:

晒女朋友，怒写水摸

[General]

· 如果条件允许，希望你可以找到一个质量更好的BG。

· 如果不写歌词的话，把Widescreen Support取消掉

[Normal]

· 00:17:474 (1) - 不是很有意义的NC，可以选择取消掉。

· 00:19:913 (4) - 统一前后DS

· 00:20:888 (2) - 统一前后DS

· 00:26:010 (1) - 统一前后DS

· 00:31:376 - 漏clap，补上吧

· 00:33:815 (4) - 段落结尾，可以考虑加Finish

· 01:09:913 (3) - 漏finish，补上吧

· 01:10:401 (4) - 漏clap，补上

· 01:10:888 (1) - 可以考虑加finish

· 01:49:425 (3) - 添加clap?

· 02:26:011 (3) - 添加finish

· 到这里我才发现复制粘贴

· 02:26:986 (1) - finish?

· 03:45:035 (1) - 这个跳有点过了，老实点用均DS就好

· 04:13:327 (1) - 可以考虑减小结尾的音量

[Hard]

· 00:16:254 (1) - 个人觉得这个whistle有点违和，可以考虑删掉。

· 00:31:376 (5) - 漏clap

· 00:50:523 (4) - 这里clap很明显，建议你加上

· 00:58:327 - 同上

· 01:06:132 - 同上

· 01:09:913 (2) - 添加finish？

· 01:25:644 (3) - 添加clap

· 02:06:621 (4) - 同上

· 02:14:425 - 同上

· 02:22:230 - 同上

· 02:26:132 - 同上

· 03:05:157 - 同上

· 03:34:425 (3) - 同上

· 04:05:644 - 同上

[Insane]

· 至于Insane的话，我觉得最应该改的就是和Hard一样的蓝线clap，因为曲子里面确实存在，而且加入了听起来也不违和，所以我建议你加上。

祝你好运咯，反正aji人都是speed rank（偏见）

tm1209 wrote:

[General]


TAGS里面加aji


[Insane]


感觉切指什么的比实际难度大一点

00:10:401 (1) - 按照vocal 来的话我觉得更像是这样

00:12:718 (2,3) - 空着一个1/1的话DT玩起来感觉有点奇怪

00:14:059 (8,1,2,3) - 这之后有段地方歌词似乎是一样的，这样看上去不错

00:22:596 (2) - 504,128,22596,2,0,P|456:113|406:115,1,100.000000298023,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0: ？

01:20:401 (8,9,1) - 这三个我感觉弧度朝外比较好看一点，01:20:523 (9) - （410，226）？

01:24:303 (9,10,1) - 应该是这样的把？

01:25:523 (3,4,5,6) - 这个似乎容易读错

02:38:693 (1,2) - blanket？



[Hard]


CS3好♂大

01:21:132 (2) - （204，247）

美丽


这么个水摸并没有什么卵用

Wing My Way wrote:

阿吉
[Insane]
00:17:474 (1) - 横着不好
00:31:498 (7,8) - ctrl g好玩
01:26:010 (5,6) - 叠到4下面会比较好玩
01:41:132 (7) - NC
02:51:742 (4,5) - ctrl g
02:55:766 (4,1) - 漏音了
03:42:352 (5,6) - 我觉着角度不好
03:16:986 (6) - ctrl g

[hard]
玛德 in改改就成hard了夫妻
01:00:157 (2,3,4) - 不如弄个滑条 这种突然变1/3不用NC吗？
01:10:401 (3) - 改成spin好不好
02:26:499 (3) - ^
04:12:840 (3) - 折返一下好不好

Kagamine Ren wrote:

[General]

1. The background doesn't fit the song because i can't see Hayano's bikini. Consider to change it.
2. Is the source right? It's supposed to be 'Love Live! School idol project' imo.Please check it.
3. Add 'ラブライブ! µ's Kousaka Honoka Minami Kotori Koizumi Hanayo 高坂穂乃果 南ことり 小泉花陽 新田恵海 内田彩 久保ユリカ Nitta Emi Uchida Aya Kubo Yurika' into the tags.

[Hitsound]

1. Though it's not a big issue,i suggest you to add a sliderslide hitsound.
2. 00:33:815 - this is the end of a part. I suggest you to add Finish here.
3. 01:10:888 - ^
4. 01:17:230 - delete the clap here since it's no need and there is nothing like this in the music.
5. 01:18:205 - ^
6. 01:17:718 - 01:18:205 - hmm.. add whistle to follow the....(idk what it is.
7. 01:49:913 - add finish ^
8. 02:26:986 - ^
9. 02:33:327 - ^ delete
10. 02:34:303 - ^
11. 02:33:815 (1,1) - ^ whistle
12. 03:17:718 - ^ use finish instead of hitnormal
13. 03:26:010 - 03:26:986 - 03:26:498 (1,1) - ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
14. 04:19:473 - here is a piano, whistle sound better imo.

]

[Normal]

1. 00:10:401 (1) - In lower difficulty diffs,i suggest to follow more vocal,especially something like this. So here i suggest to use 1/6 snap slider to follow the vocal.Like you did at 01:32:352 (1) - this
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:15:279 (3,2) - overlaps like this are weird,try to move 00:16:742 (2) - to avoid the overlapping pls.
   Here is the suggestion:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:17:230 (3) - also,considering the spacing with00:16:254 (1,2,3) - ,i suggest to stack 00:17:230 (3,4) - them because
4. 00:21:864 - highly suggest to add a note here and it will be better, also ofc slider is ok too.
5. 00:44:547 (3,2) - well, same problem,it's better to move it a little down,maybe(288,288)is ok so 00:44:303 (2,3,2) - the spacing of this will be better imo.
   Here is the pic:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:53:327 (1,2,3) - this flow can still be improved imo,i'd say ctrl+g this.and then,if you take this advice,the following notes(00:55:035 (4,1,2) - )must be placed in another way for better flow. Here is my suggestion:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:58:205 (2) - move a bit down,it may touch the HP bar.
8. 01:00:157 (2,3) - this blanket can be improved a lot.
9. 01:04:059 (3,1,2) - this flow is a little bad.To improve this,i advise you to ctrl+g 01:05:035 (1,2) - this. If you take this,pls take care of the DS btw.
10. 01:06:986 (1,2,3) - these straight sliders look very bad,pls curve them for better looking~ For example:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 01:22:352 (4,1,2,3) - omg,this flow and placement are both weird to me. Pls pls change this in another way like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 02:09:913 (2,2) - Try to stack them for better looking.
13. 02:23:084 (1,2,3) - same with above,too straight flow.Here is my another way which can improve this:
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 02:38:450 (4,3) - oh try to stack them pls.
15. 03:10:888 (3,1) - this flow is bad imo,maybe you can ctrl+g 03:10:888 (3) - this for better flow. Ofc take care of the spacing between 03:10:401 (2,3) -
    Here is my suggestion:
    SPOILER

    
16. 03:11:864 (1) - why this slider's shape is different from 03:12:840 (3) - ?please make them be the same.
17. 03:46:011 (3,4,1,2,3) - well,this is copied from the first kiai time.So take a look at my advice above and do some changes as above pls.
18. 04:01:620 (3,1) - still same with above. If you insist to use this pattern,i suggest to place them like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
19. 04:09:425 (3) - curve this like 04:10:401 (1) -
20. 04:12:352 (1,2) - use ctrl+c&v to make them parallel.

[Hard]

1. Why CS3? CS3.5 fits the spread best. Though it's too late to change.
2. 00:24:059 (1,2,3) - the spacing here is very confusing since the notes are not on white ticks. Here is my advice:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:28:937 (4,5) - this flow is a little bad imo,could be improved like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:02:596 (5,2) - the overlap looks weird,try to stack them.
5. 01:04:059 (2,3) - hmm...this spacing and this flow are both confusing imo. You can improve this a bit. Try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:34:303 (1,2) - these two look so weird. Try this:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 01:37:230 (4) - move down to 198,159 so the flow of01:37:230 (4,5) - will be better imo. Like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:45:523 (5,1) - the spacing is too big imo. i'd say ctrl+g 01:45:523 (5) - this then it would be better.
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 01:47:962 (1,2,3) - why not use 1.4DS as you did before?
10. 02:52:352 (1) - oh the spacing is too big . Try to move 02:52:352 (1) - to 259,288 to balance the spacing. like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 03:43:084 (1,2) - same with above, it'll look better if you do like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
12. 03:46:011 (4) - again,316,159 would be better
13. 03:54:304 (5,1) - same,ctrl+g 5 please . WHY ARE YOU SO LAZY?
14. 04:01:864 (3,1) - try to stack them.
15. 04:04:547 (1,2,3,4) - these notes semm so random,please place them in a beter way. Here is my advice:
    
    SPOILER

    
    lazy zzb

[Insane]

1. 00:26:498 (2,7) - please avoid the overlap. I'd say move 00:26:986 (3,4,5,6,7) - a little left.
2. 00:54:059 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - hmm..this flow is a bit hard to play, try to ctrl+g 00:54:791 (8,9) - this. Then it would be fine
3. 00:57:230 (1,2,3,4,5) - the stream is too boring for playing. Try another way please. For example,like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
   and then the flow of 00:57:230 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - would be better at the same time
4. 01:02:108 (3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same
5. 01:06:986 (1,2) - this looks weird, i think it's better to do it like this:
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:18:205 (1,1) - move a bit right since 01:17:474 (5,6,1,1,1) - this seems not a straight line.
7. 01:21:132 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - this can be more fun and more beautiful imo.Here is my suggestion:
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:24:303 (9,10,1) - if you wanna use this kind of overlap, pls use it at the whole map. Or i highly suggest to to stack them
9. 02:23:084 (1,2) - same with above.
10. 03:17:230 (7,8) - this flow doesn't fit here imo since you should consider 03:16:986 (6,7) - this, this flow is a bit hard but you suddenly make 03:17:230 (7,8) - this flow very easy,it may make players confused. I'd say try to make them kepp the same spacing. like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
11. 03:46:254 (4,5,6) - ctrl+g this because 03:46:010 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - this flow is tooooo bad.
12. 03:50:523 (10,11) - spacing error? they are supposed to be 1.0 DS.

Regraz wrote:

Normal Hard CopyPaste太严重了。

[Hard]
00:24:059 (1,2,3) - 这什么鬼间距
01:04:059 (2,3,4) - ^

00:32:840 (1) - 尾巴音效
01:48:937 (1) - ^

01:06:986 (1) - 太弯了，平滑一点

01:10:401 (3) - 尾巴Normal Sampleset

01:25:766 (4,1) - Blanket

01:33:571 (3) - 违和感太严重，还是按正常的1/2节奏来吧

02:41:864 (3,1) - blanket

02:43:571 (2,3,1) - 间距大一点。很容易误读成1/3

02:54:303 (1,2,3) - 间距小一点。很容易误读成1/3。而且Hard这么大间距也太难了。

04:02:108 (4,1) - 包好

困了，明天摸IN

[Insane]
00:54:303 (6,7) - 间距大一点

01:24:303 (9,10,1) - 别叠啊，看着很不舒服，还很古怪，前面没有这样的

01:25:523 (3,4,5,6) - 这antijump太坑。。。没有（明显的）音乐支持
01:33:571 (4,5,6) - ^

02:05:035 (4) - 和3叠一点 http://puu.sh/h9s03/c47aa61909.jpg

02:39:669 (5,6) - Blanket

03:16:742 (5,6,7,8,1) - http://puu.sh/h9s9Q/cf8d6a8ef9.jpg http://puu.sh/h9sbS/e8c325bb80.jpg


则能不认真做图，伤心。;w;

smallboat wrote:

[General]

1. Combo 3的顏色有點接近純白，建議調深些。 (也可能是我電腦本身色差)

[Normal]

1. 01:10:888 (1) - Add a N-finish? Seems good. (For all diff)
2. 02:00:401 (2,3) - Looks like this flow road so weird,use ctrl+g here? (And move a bit keep curve with slider end)
3. 03:17:474 (1) - The slider end with the same 01:10:888 (1) here.

[Hard]

1. 00:28:937 (4,5) - This jump have bit far, try to close a bit (Suggest 2.2~2.4x,QAT accept range,just like 00:46:498 (3,4) -
   
   here)
2. 01:10:401 (3) - 感覺還是換一個轉盤就好，這snap的音不明顯啊 (或找QAT看看)
3. 01:33:571 (3) - The third reverse has no sound, need to be fixed :
   SPOILER

   
4. 01:45:523 (5,1) - This jump have bit far, try to close a bit
5. 02:26:499 (3) - 同01:10:401
6. 03:42:352 (3) - 同01:33:571 (3)
7. 03:49:304 (2) - Move up a bit, near off-screen.
8. 03:54:304 (5) - This jump have bit far, try to close a bit

[Insane] 看你這個diff的連打圖 讓我想到我現在目前做的也這樣放

1. 01:10:401 (5) - This slider reverse snap so confused, I adjust 1/6 to 1/16 are all unsnap,suggest use hard diff suggestion I think.
2. 01:24:303 (9,10,1) - 這stream只有10跟1是完全stack上的，我有預感會被Q開頭的挑刺
3. 01:25:523 (3,4,5,6) - 這會不會誤讀啊，add a NC for (4) ?
4. 01:33:571 (4,5,6) - So confused distance, same above.
5. 02:26:498 (5) - Same as 01:10:401 (5) .
6. 02:33:815 (1,1) - 怎麼不作速度漸變，這樣沒什麼感覺呢 (03:26:498 (1,1) - 也可以)
7. 02:51:742 (4,5) - 以4為開頭有點難掌握打點，因為前面紅色tick也有音，所以02:51:620 這tick還是加了吧
8. 02:53:693 (5) - Same above
9. 03:07:718 (6) - Keep the same DS?