1. Easy (1.45 stars, 101 notes)
2. Hard (3.23 stars, 279 notes)
3. Insane (4.56 stars, 390 notes)
4. Normal (1.94 stars, 152 notes)

KaedekaShizuru wrote:

当你第一次叫我摸这图的时候，我是拒绝的。因为我觉得，啊，你不能叫我摸我就去摸，第一我要试听一下这歌，我又不像你随便什么图都能接都能做都能摸，那酸爽duang~ 很好！很强！很垃圾！结果你一定出来骂我，这特么摸得什么激霸！就证明我摸图其实很辣鸡。我就说我要先听一下，后来我觉得不管是什么歌，花花一定能做的很好的，而且不会有各种槽点。看了一遍，接下来呢……
我编不下去了Orz

[General]
第一根红线完全可以起在第一个note上刚好对齐重音啊 现在的红线歪了1/4 ？？？没歪啊，不过把另一个红线删了
而且为啥插了两个红线

[Insane]
00:16:695 (2) - 最好NC一下 先放着，看看别人怎么说
00:27:690 (1,2) - 叠好或者错开更多 233……这个我就是这么摆的，觉得爽
00:28:627 (2,3) - ↑
00:35:445 (6) - 改用红锚点会好看一些 看看别人怎么说
00:38:343 (4,1) - 为何总是歪了一点…… 我研究了一下，还是叠了

够水 hard没啥可说的 真摸不动其实是懒得摸
顺便乃头像偷的真快=. =

1. hahahahaha, what is this 鬼
2. Countdown关掉
3. Letterbox和Wide Screen随意，不过好像diff里没保持统一你检查下

1. 00:20:105 (1) - 噫没stack好
2. 00:47:378 (1) - 还是这种好看点？
   

1. 00:27:690 (1,2) - 噫这个stack
2. 00:28:628 (2,3) - ^

1. 00:34:935 (3) - 音都跑前面红线，可以改像00:32:207 -
2. 01:00:503 (5) - 折一下不？

1. 00:01:526 (2) - 可以剪短

1. 00:32:889 (3,4) - 调下次序试试
2. 01:01:014 (4) - 剪短加个圈跟下鼓不？
3. 01:26:071 (3) - 剪短到白线拉开ds好看些，00:15:162 (3) -

1. 01:07:662 (4) - 可以反下弯折，对着下个条
2. 美丽

AIBat wrote:

MP3 Bitrate
The bitrate for vivid OP.mp3 is 32 kb/s, which is below the miniumum of 128 kb/s.

DakeDekaane wrote:

Hi.

[General]
Your audio file seems to be VBR instead CBR, making the preview point not being where it should be (in client), also looks a bit glitchy: http://puu.sh/haMKB.png

AIBat wrote:

MP3 Bitrate
The bitrate for vivid OP.mp3 is 32 kb/s, which is below the miniumum of 128 kb/s.

You should fix it, you could use this one (offset should be the same): Link I changed to another mp3, uhh whatever
You should make the yellow colour less light, so the reverse arrow is easier to see. I made it lighter, which also makes sense because it changes colour automatically (ths should be reported to peppy that yellow doesn't really count to brightness)

[ Easy]
This difficulty could use at least CS2.5 (although 3 would be recommended), to make the map look less cluttered, making the 1/2 rhythm a bit more clear by avoiding the big overlaps (This would also take out those little overlaps between 1/1 notes). I changed to 2.4, which also makes sense (and I just want a pretty ENHI icon set). I used to set it to 2.5 though... what the magic
Also I think there's a lot of 1/2 rhythm for an Easy, but I think it can't be helped that much given the complexity of the song.
01:06:810 (1) - This slider is missing a finish? about the finish, other finishes, and finishes in other sets, I regret to say that I think these points aren't strong enough to add a finish impov...
01:10:048 (2) - You could put a circle instead, to keep it a bit simple. can't quite understand... changed to a repeating slider
01:12:264 (1) - This slider is missing a finish?

[ Normal]
Increase a bit the CS here, like in Easy. I thought 2.5-3-3.8-4 is classic... whatever. changed to 3.1
00:58:798 (2) - You could remove this note, to give a tiny break for players. This diff is already a bit hard for a Normal, so let's try to be less evil. but... it's not even above 2.0 star... and theoretically it's rankable standalone, so keeping this difficulty is ok to me
01:01:014 (1,2) - I think the circle should be first and then the slider, so we have a slider start on the strongest beat here, like you did for 00:55:389 (1) - and 01:06:810 (1) - hmm, I also considered the previous line, so I deleted the 1 and changed 2 to slider
01:06:810 (1) - This slider is missing a finish?
01:12:264 (1) - ^

[ Hard]
00:27:435 (3) - Although I know your intention here, the held note doesn't go farther than 1/2 beat, so this should be 1/2 slider. there's an obvious hit at its end, that's how it fits music
00:35:446 (1) - ^Something similar. I know this is different, but using 1/2 is less meaningful imo
01:20:446 (2) - ^
01:06:810 (1) - This slider is missing a finish?
01:12:264 (1) - ^

[ Insane]
00:11:923 (8) - This should be 1/2 for the strong beat for the drums (you could keep the same spacing). imo the atmosphere fits 3/4
00:26:753 (1) - This is more like a single and strong hit than a held note, so a circle could fit better here, you could make it in a way it's stacked on 00:27:094 (2) - to give the same feeling you wanted to achieve. to me it's a long pitch, so
00:27:690 (1) - Shouldn't this be on the white tick? Both spacing and rhythm are a bit awkward to play. ??? drum is like that. changed to triple
00:35:787 (1,2,3,4) - Could you make the spacing a bit more obvious? I know there's the AR, but still x_x changed to triple
01:02:207 (4) - You are going with the vocals with this slider, so one would expect to keep going on vocals, but then you change suddenly for the instrumental, so this is kind of weird to play. Hmm, I don't find a better solution. let's keep what it is
01:10:389 (4) - This slider plays a bit awkward imo, as the next beat isn't that strong to deserve a hit. ^
01:12:264 (1) - ^Something similar as above
01:06:810 (1) - This slider is missing a finish?
01:12:264 (1) - ^

That'd be all from my part, nice mapset <3
Good luck (poke me back when you feel ready).

handsome wrote:

hi

• Insane

1. 00:19:105 (1,2,3) - its so weird that vocal is on white tick, drums too, but 00:19:617 (2,3) - is on red tick. I think it follows the guitar well? whatever, I can't find a better solution
   
   Normal
2. 00:32:401 (4) - considering the vocals, its better to change the rhythm here: http://i.imgur.com/5RHnWdC.png this feels more weird... I think it's better to follow the key sound
3. 00:53:537 (3,4) - its better to not keep these parallel I feel ok
4. 01:00:355 (6) - doing a 1/2 slider (or some variant), so that there is 3/2 gap for the next note is better to keep consistency with 01:05:639 (5,1) - 01:11:435 (6,1) - changed
   
   Easy
5. HP2? 1 feels too forgiving, like i can miss 5 notes and still live :/ is that the meaning of easy..? +0.5
6. 00:25:923 (2) - its nicer to make this a 1/1 slider for the piano, sounds kinds weird
7. 01:00:185 (5) - same as normal, maybe repeat it so that it can have 3/2 gap like later on. changed
8. 01:07:344 (2,3) - i don't think the 3/2 gap here is too fluid. added a note

Ranking Criteria wrote:

Eastern artists must be written in the proper 'surname firstname' format (e.g. Japanese/Chinese/Korean). For artists which have a preferred romanisation, use this one. If you're unsure of your artist's name, then check previously ranked maps, Google, Wikipedia, or ask a BN for help.

SPOILER

http://www.mizukinana.jp/profile/