1. Beautiful (3.58 stars, 533 notes)
2. Easy (1.51 stars, 165 notes)
3. Hard (3 stars, 453 notes)
4. Normal (1.87 stars, 250 notes)

Shad0w1and wrote:

班門弄斧只能找點不會改啊

00:03:202 (1,2) - 我也不知道怎麼處理這種沒音的地方。。ahaha
00:09:202 (1,2,3) - vocal有一種釋放的柑橘，考慮加速加ds或怎麼着？

00:41:941 (4,5,6) - 這裏前後都是跟vocal，只放兩個5,6跟鼓聲感覺稍微違和
01:08:159 (2,3,1,2,3,4) - overmap？跟的是后面的music
01:15:724 (1) - 違和。建議 01:15:463 - fix

01:30:594 (1) - 可以考慮1/2滑條，因爲vocal放慢了这个主要跟的是背景音
02:18:594 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - 花樣改改？这个可以到时候找mod的时候考虑一下

Megurine Luka wrote:

（づ￣3￣）づ╭☆～

tutuhaha wrote:

渚薰我男神

[Teichan] wrote:

感觉要变成水kudosu的摸了

00:12:594 (5) - stack这个..全程都是这样所以..
00:13:637 (1) - 换个finish吧，这个不适合加到前面去了
00:17:550 (1) - 稍微提一下音量提音就算了...
00:20:159 (3,4,1) - 个人不太喜欢这种梗，另外1没拉好到时候找mod看看有啥好建议吧，1我很努力了orz...
00:28:768 (4) - 既然没有对称，不如作为blanket来包住5想保留这个flow..

SPOILER

00:37:376 (1,2,3,4,5) - 最好对称fix
00:51:463 (2,3,4,5) - 不太喜欢这样杂乱的滑条还杂乱啊....
00:59:289 (1) - 遮挡不太好，这样吧嘛这个还好啦..

SPOILER

01:15:724 (3,4) - 用和2一样的滑条吧这边想用点击的感觉所以
01:57:202 (3,4) - 可以跳一下，听钢琴音嘛...不太懂怎么跳
01:59:028 (2,1) - 还是一样的，这种pattern个人不太喜欢还ok拉要是还是有很多人说我就改

其他还好了

cmn_891127 wrote:

tutuhaha wrote:

渚薰我男神

[Easy]
没什么说的……

[Normal]
00:17:550 (1,2) - 我觉得这么一个重音被slider弱化了，两个颠倒一下位置，https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2332098 主要跟的是歌词所以...
00:25:898 (1,2) - 01:49:376 (1,2) - 01:57:724 (1,2) - ^
00:33:202 (4) - 这个1.5拍没有必要吧，而且红线白线都是有vocal和钢琴音的它有一个drum的音是在1.5的._.！

[Hard]
Slider Tick 2？前面觉得多出的点点好难看
完全不需要mod，良心作！摸摸大！

[Insane]
00:17:028 (3) - 可以拖到后面的蓝线聪明，fix了
00:25:898 (1,2,3,4) - 4个1/4slider排列太密集，掩盖的音乐的节奏，不好听。我觉得可以适当用1/2的slider，或者是加绿线控制一下弱拍的音量_(:зゝ∠)_我觉得还ok拉
00:36:072 (3,4) - vocal不是在00:36:594 ~ 00:36:724之间么要是有人再说我就改_(:зゝ∠)_
00:44:420 (1,2) - ^，要不消一下(1)的尾音，听起来有点别扭嘛..
01:19:246 (2,3,4,5,6,1) - 不要弄成一团，要不就改一下NC，左边那堆蓝色，右边那堆灰色，01:19:115 (1) - 这个变成绿色换个方法摆了

Xelasto wrote:

Hi This is my second mod so far, so don't expect a perfect one

Easy

美しい世界 is what I believe the title of the song is. Beautiful World is the romanised
00:00:855 (1,1) - Why not align these?
00:23:811 (1,2,3) - This part is a bit unexpected and would be quite hard for a beginner. Remember easy mode is for beginners. They're quite slow.
00:37:376 (4) - Start NC?
00:44:941 (4) - NC?
01:09:724 (1,2,3) - Space these out more?
01:36:855 (1,2,3,4) - To make a more perfect square, use ctrl + shift + D
01:45:202 (1,2,3,4) - ^
However my biggest problem with this is that everything is slightly messy. Most sliders aren't aligned very well.

Normal

Up the HP drain and OD by 1
...That's all I can find.

Hard

00:03:202 (1,2) - Don't stack these, it gives the illusion earlier timing.
00:08:681 (6,7) - Is a bit deceiving, looks like a triple note.
00:10:507 (4,5,6,7) - Deceiving as well, since its so small it's hard to tell if its a slider or 2 notes.
00:12:594 (2,3,4) - Space these out farther
00:14:681 (6,1,2) - ^
00:16:507 (5,6) - ^
00:19:376 (3,1,2,1) - ^
00:19:376 (3,1) - hard to read
00:22:507 (4,1,2,3) - DEFINITELY space out more
00:32:941 (3,1,2,3) - ^
00:55:898 (3,1,2,3) - Hard to read
00:57:202 (1,3) - Don't hide 3 under 1. First time tryers are BOUND to mess up there because they can't see it. (Do this with any other part like this)
01:25:115 (4,5,6,7) - Space out more
01:27:463 (4,5,6) - ^
01:33:202 (2,3,4) - Align them
01:35:289 (2,3,4) - Space out more
01:51:202 (4,1,2,3,4) - Definitely space out more
01:54:333 (4,1,2,3) - ^
Turn the HP drain up 0.5 while putting the approach rate down a little, so people have a tiny bit more time to read it.

The biggest problem in this mode (obviously) is too much overmapping. It becomes extremely hard to see what your supposed to do when its all on top of each other. It's fine if you overmap, but space them out a bit more so its easier to read for new hard mode players. Crunching them up like that would be fine in insane. Other than readability, this map is mostly fine.actually..space is not that hard to acceptable <3

Beautiful

IDK if this is a big problem but the insane mode is WORLDS harder than hard. It's slightly easier to read for the most part.

00:10:246 (6) - NC?nope
01:23:811 (1,2,1,2,1) - Completely unreadable. The flow of the map is insanely fast and then you hit this, which is much slower and spaced slightly oddly. Try and make it so that people don't mistake it for a stream.fix
01:34:246 (5) - NC?nope
01:42:594 (5) - NC?nope
02:24:594 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - ^fix
02:25:637 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - ^fix
Turn the approach rate down by 1 or 0.5fix

Also the flow of the song still feels unranked sadly, but I can't put my finger on what parts they are. Sorry

Overall your map is pretty good, I can tell you are experienced at beatmapping. Keep up the good work

byfar wrote:

m4m > > t/264789

[Beautiful]

00:07:637 (2,3,4,5) - this is confusing to read + there is no music cue for stream? well..is should be fine..

00:09:202 (1,2) - no music cue for stack.. I suggest another slider like this 00:08:811 (2) - ...should be fine x2
00:12:333 (4) - nc? hmm...yep
00:14:159 (3,4,5) - i dont feel like this particular stack fits, maybe try other combo like circle + slider? hmm...nope

00:35:289 (1,2,3) - weird spacing should be fine x3
00:42:333 (6,7) - no music cue for stack ^
00:48:463 (7,8) - i think distance too little from 00:48:072 (5,6) - ^
00:48:072 (5,6) - same with ^ but too little from 00:47:681 (3,4) - ^
try increasing spacing just a little, like maybe .5x
00:47:811 (4) - nc?fix
00:48:855 (1) - delete nc fix
00:49:376 (2) - nc fix
01:06:333 (4,1) - spacing slightly uncomfortable fix
01:19:115 (1,2,3,4) - difficult to read should be fine x 6
01:20:420 (2) - increase spacing from 01:20:159 (1) - and 01:20:681 (3) - ? fix
01:31:637 (1,2,1,2) - not a big fan of these.. fix
01:56:420 (3,1) - again uncomfortable spacing fix
decent insane +nice flow but just watch out for spacing and dont go too much.

[Hard]
sorry i didnt find any errors here, but::

00:09:985 (3,4,5,6,7) - kinda awkward playing here, not sure what the cause is but see what u can do about it

[Normal]
good

[Easy]
why u nc here 00:31:898 (1) - instead of 00:31:898 (1) -

00:50:941 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - very good

01:09:724 (1,2,3) - weird shape

also good


good luck!! normal & easy very fun

Tarrasky wrote:

M4M---> The Ghost Princess of Hakugyokurou

General

The collor of combo 2 not is cool, maybe this yellow sounds better https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335390

Easy

Distance snap 1,20x not is the ideal but ok
Reduce Drain for 1 or 1,5
00:12:333 (3) - fnish this slider in 00:13:376 -
00:31:115 (3,1,2) - the aesthetics fron this part dont sounds good, try make something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335306
00:44:941 (4) - reposition this circle to get a perfect flow https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335311
02:02:941 (3,1,2) - same about 00:31:115 (3,1,2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335313
nice map

Normal

00:41:550 (3) - why not D:C1?
00:02:941 - maybe you can add breaktime
00:07:637 (2) - this slider is better in this angle https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335337
00:09:985 (2) - this circle not is "exactly" in the centre between 00:09:202 (1,3) -, fix
00:22:246 (2) - raises a bit this slider, in x:376 y:128
00:24:594 (2) - /\ x:344 y:32
02:05:811 (5) - put this circle in x:404 y:304

Hard

this ar is considerable high, put ar 6 or 6,5, sounds the ideal
00:01:898 (2) - this slider in this form is more adorable and simple https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2335359 FIX
01:29:028 (2,4) - ctrl + G (?) ..nope
01:53:028 (4) - remove finish FIX
01:53:550 (1) - add finish ..nope
01:57:724 (1) - maybe add finish ..nope
Nice map

Beautiful

so high OD for a Insane, reduce from 7 FIX

more nothing in special, all diffs sounds great, this song is adorable and the map is perfect, nice job and good luck

1. 00:15:463 (1,2,1) - what do you think of this pattern?
   
   for example

   
2. 00:33:463 (4) - i think this is better overturn the slider. what about you?
   
   for example

   
3. what do you think to this proposal of nc?
   00:29:028 (5) - NC , 00:29:550 (1) - remove NC , 00:30:072 (3) - NC
4. 02:00:333 (3) - what do you think of my proposal to move in x:216 y:308? i think it leads to good moving.
5. 02:02:028 (2) - i will not be able to hear something of the song here. would you like to delete this note?
6. 02:20:159 (5) - contrary to the above, better to add a note here imo. also, i think better to 02:20:289 (5) - is delete.
   but if you fixed the above, i think 00:48:072 (5,6,7,8) - is good that you do not fix.
7. 02:21:594 (5) - would you like to add your notes to this place? i think it's a good feeling with 02:22:507 (7,8,1) -

1. 00:38:028 (4,5) - would you like to overturn this note? i have already mentioned from Beautiful diff.
   
   for example

   
2. 00:49:115 (2) - if you move to x:292 y:112, you can have a better shape.

1. 00:33:202 (4) - add to clap on the slider end? i can't say with confidence...
2. 00:58:246 (3) - ^
3. 02:13:376 (3) - ^

1. 00:07:637 (2) - add to whistle on the slider end. you have already been added clap to the normal. that it is better to add it to the same imo.
2. 00:32:681 (2) - distance is a little different. if you've made a mistake, i think that it is better to fix them.
3. 02:04:507 (2) - ^

Frobe wrote:

hello~ :>


[Beautiful]

1. 00:15:463 (1,2,1) - what do you think of this pattern? fix
   
   for example

   
2. 00:33:463 (4) - i think this is better overturn the slider. what about you? fix
   
   for example

   
3. what do you think to this proposal of nc?
   00:29:028 (5) - NC , 00:29:550 (1) - remove NC , 00:30:072 (3) - NC ..is ok
4. 02:00:333 (3) - what do you think of my proposal to move in x:216 y:308? i think it leads to good moving. fix
5. 02:02:028 (2) - i will not be able to hear something of the song here. would you like to delete this note?hmmm..nope
6. 02:20:159 (5) - contrary to the above, better to add a note here imo. also, i think better to 02:20:289 (5) - is delete.
   but if you fixed the above, i think 00:48:072 (5,6,7,8) - is good that you do not fix. ..nope
7. 02:21:594 (5) - would you like to add your notes to this place? i think it's a good feeling with 02:22:507 (7,8,1) -nope..

[Hard]

1. 00:38:028 (4,5) - would you like to overturn this note? i have already mentioned from Beautiful diff.hmm...is fine _(:зゝ∠)_
   
   for example

   
2. 00:49:115 (2) - if you move to x:292 y:112, you can have a better shape. well...maybe but I dont want it get overlap with another slider so...

[Normal]

1. 00:33:202 (4) - add to clap on the slider end? i can't say with confidence...
2. 00:58:246 (3) - ^
3. 02:13:376 (3) - ^

[Easy]

1. 00:07:637 (2) - add to whistle on the slider end. you have already been added clap to the normal. that it is better to add it to the same imo.
2. 00:32:681 (2) - distance is a little different. if you've made a mistake, i think that it is better to fix them.
3. 02:04:507 (2) - ^

sorry to my poor english skills...

good luck!

[CSGA]Ar3sgice wrote:

我看了一下还没mod你这图 但是这几天那更新导致编辑器卡的不行 我看了一下觉得你的图好像也没啥能摸的

所以

当我鸽了吧2333333