CaffeAmericano wrote:

BOUYAAA!!! ! !! ! !!!! !!! !! !!!

• 01:26:947 (3,2) - stack is slightly off
  
  00:55:889 (3) - I think a small jump would emphasize clap nicely
  
  00:59:242 (4,5) - This jumps looks unusually large I use similar spacing on other places example : 00:43:712 (6,1) -
  
  01:32:594 (3,4) - 04:37:072 (1,4) - Blanket could be better
  
  01:36:830 (1,2) - This DS seems to be unusually large for the music. Most other jumps seem to occur at downbeat/clap same reason as above, also this is a clap
  
  01:55:889 - I think this might be better if it’s clickable this is not what i'm following though, i didn't change it for now, we'll see if someone else has something to say
  
  03:29:300 (1,3) - 04:03:264 (7,2) - 04:18:314 (3,1) - Stack? i don't get why i'd stack the first but did the rest
  
  04:40:222 (6) - I think moving this to (387, 308) might loiok neater
  
  05:37:138 - Making this clickable would be fun. Strong drum. Maybe a double? leaving this as is as what you suggested is a bit too uncomfortable to my taste in such a low intensity part

Good luck!

Strategas wrote:

Unused hitsounds:
soft-slidertick2.wav thx bouya

00:47:242 (2,3) - it's a slow part but still the flow is eh butperfect flow isnt the goal

01:16:712 (3,1) - slider leniency and stuff but pretty huge jump still considering how slow that slider is moved it a bit closer but like notmuchlol

01:23:771 (4,4) - nc?

01:47:065 (4) - you didn't space this much b4 01:44:241 (4) - na dont need super combospam i think

02:30:633 (1,2,3,4,5) - so misleading lol, having same stuff going on and decreasing slider by one tick to put circle there, prob better if you keep same patern till next downbeat for that part and switch to the other way at 02:31:966 (1) - or smth
02:38:633 (1,2,3,4,5) - like people just played constant hold sliders i think they'll realize this is also another one

02:42:300 (7) - the slider end is even above the metronome lol s t ru cture

03:09:633 (3,4) - 03:14:966 (3,4) - 03:17:633 (3,4) - 03:18:966 (3,4) - your spacing disappeared even tho I think it should increase or stay the same they're like generally the same thing dont need to measure each so closely:(

03:32:056 (3) - note seems out of place for me. placement for 1 2 3 seems better like this that direction change to the slider ouch thinking the current is more natural

03:33:672 (1,2,3) - this too something like this sametbh

03:52:964 (2,3) - you had flow everywhere but decided to go wtf here first slider in 1/3 section that doesnt start on white tick its cool

04:11:264 (4) - this feels a bit forced, just putting at at 124,60 seem better for aesthetics and still is cool to play deserves more than that cello is strong

04:28:672 (4,2,3,4) - zzz improve visualz g

04:37:072 - volume z

04:44:122 (8) - move to 308,217 to avoid dumb overlap? could then also bring 04:43:522 (5) - a bit closer to 8 (around 384,265) d

05:09:326 (4) - this is really out of place lol, just keep with the rest 05:07:363 (1,2,3) - , you didn't change the shape and stuff when the music changed at 05:11:403 (3) - so yee z


good stuff t y ! !

O-Moei wrote:

Hi !, my 💑M4M request.

✨ = Suggestion
💧 = Uuhhh?
💥 = Warning !!!

Here we go...

General :
- None -

BOUYAAA's Insane
✨How about OD 8,2 ? 👃 no idea why this would make a difference honestly lol
✨00:56:594 (1,2) - 00:53:065 (1,2) - 01:07:536 (1,2) - 05:23:888 (1,2) - Slightly imperfect blanketing 👌🏽 tried
✨00:50:065 (2) - Stack with 00:51:300 (2) - 👌🏽 tried
✨01:49:536 (3) - ^ 01:50:947 (4,5) - 👃 too far apart to matter
✨03:30:435 (3) - ^ 03:29:300 (1) - 👃 i do'nt stack here because i think that 03:29:624 (2,3,3) - and 03:29:300 (1,3,1) - being equidistant looks better
✨01:13:183 (6) - NC and remove 01:13:536 (1) - ? 👃i think i prefer ncing the downbeat here
✨01:36:830 (1) - Remove NC ? (Same applied : 01:31:183 (3) - ) 👌🏽 e
✨01:39:653 (1) - ^ then NC 01:40:359 (3) - 👌🏽help i forgot how to map
✨03:43:968 (1) - Try position x324y204 (Neater placement using DS imo) 👌🏽 moved it my own way

Oke, that's all from me. All e best :3

deetz wrote:

[bouya]


i blame pishi

00:59:242 (4) - why is this the only 1/2 overlap on a slider like this i ran out of space lol
01:01:183 (2) - could increase spacing from previous object or even ctrl-g and move up to make 01:01:889 (1) - feel less important. you could even use baby spacing on 01:01:889 (1) - if you want I want it to stand out though. Sure the sound might be weak but both drum and violing parts sound different so i wanted to separate them. Also a small jump on the downbeat never feels wrong imo
01:20:594 (1) - this is a good nc i like it i like it too!!!
01:24:830 (1,2,3,4) - not sure about this. I think I tried to play it as 1/6 but it's probably fine lol. could use really baby spacing like pishi did to make it abundantly clear
02:09:300 (1) - its perfectly readable but why stack it fully with the last slider it shouldn't have been there probably fucked up when sending to pishi or something. I thought i fixed that with last update w/e
03:53:364 (4,5,6) - starting the rhythm on 03:53:464 - to not let 03:53:564 - be clickable feels kind of odd and I wasn't really able to grasp the rhythm in this part in my playthroughs. the rhythm kind of gets weird in this part so it becomes even more important to make sure the most emphasized sounds (the snares) are clearly connected to a rhythm that the player taps. something like this could work. what pishi did also works took your suggestion, i initially wanted to make the 3 snares clickable but the only way i found to make that work and not make it too hard is to have a stacked triple but yea that felt a bit underwhelming compared to the rest
04:03:764 (2,3) - couldn't hurt to increase spacing on this a little bit to make sure that nobody will ever get confused about the snapping Leaving that as is as i think that the visual (sliderlength and spacing) and rythmic (song's pace changing and previous lsider being 1/2) queues are enough for the player to adapt. I asked for quite a few testplays by players at about my skill level and this was never an issue
04:32:872 (2) - please nc this i know that it makes the previous combo a single object but it will help people find this white tick by intuition uh yea sure i get a bit lost in my nc patterns sometimes, made it so it's a bit more consistent with the rest of the section
04:44:722 (7) - would be better to have this entire slider as drum finishes cuz the drum thingy starts at 04:44:722 - and it feels weird having a clap among slider repeats anyways did that
05:12:896 (1) - sharkie's extra inspired by byfar's sliderart

nice ty ily

fieryrage wrote:

nice preview point
im assuming the literal fuckshit ton of bookmarks is for timing so im gonna leav that stuff out (01:53:065 (1,2,3,4) - tho this is some good shit)

00:40:006 (5,6) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6150138 am i legally allowed to point this stuff out my blanket aesthetics are 2 deep
00:54:653 (8,9,10) - nice even triangl lmofa made it less even
01:00:124 (1,2,3,4) - feel like these should reduce in spacing tbh there's a lot less emphasis on the last two notes consistent spacing is more cooldown tbh
02:43:300 (3,4,5,6,7) - this is like the most ugly curve i think i've ever seen for a stream like y is 7 FUCKING STRAIGHT EODWNWARDS slider the
02:51:633 (7) - move sliderend a bit to the left so it fits the stream :d d:
03:55:064 (1) - is this even i don t think it is. think gooder
04:12:464 (7) - pretty useless but nc here? yes
04:50:272 (1,2,3) - y curve triple aes
05:12:953 (1) - ending this on the 1/12 tick seems more fitting here tbh but tahts MINOR ASETHETIC (even ending it 05:22:514 - here is kind of more fitting for that whatever thing) wat do it do
05:25:888 (5) - nc
05:29:888 (6) - nc
05:33:888 (5) - nc
05:38:638 (6) - ya i think i made the point clear im gonna stop doin this i cant mod fucking slow partsZ tbh the 1 measure combos in slow make it seem cooler somehow
05:45:888 (7) - ok this one u nc'd 05:37:888 (1) - here so un-nc'd
05:56:013 (1) - happy30 0

BOOYA all u gotta do is disable widescreen supp and 04:37:072 - really nice meme with the timing point vols ther
02:07:966 (1,1) - also why are these literally on top of each other

okxzccxz