1. Hard (2.71 stars, 543 notes)
2. Insane (3.65 stars, 799 notes)
3. Normal (1.6 stars, 288 notes)

1. 01:10:127 (3) - 始端部分にバスドラの音がないと思うのでfinish外したほうがスネアのclap音が映えるかも
2. 02:01:843 (5) - 低めのタム音が鳴っていると思うのでAdditions DrumのFinish合いそう。
3. 02:22:664 (2) - 01:10:127 (3) - ここの部分と同じです。
4. 02:30:724 (3) - ^
5. 03:17:515 (2) - 終端部分にスネア音が鳴ってるのでclapのほうが合いそうです
6. 03:19:306 (1,2,3,4) - 03:19:306 (1,2) - でvocalをfollowしてると思うのですが、03:20:649 - のバスドラ音をとってあげたほうが03:20:873 (3) - のbeatが変わる部分に入りやすいかなと感じました。
   idea
   
   SPOILER

   

   

SPOILER

1. 00:07:221 (4,1) - The movement wasn't really the best here, don't get me wrong here, it was great but the straight slider breaks the awesome flow. Could you consider re-arranging accordingly to this picture? I feel like it'd improve it a lot;
   
   Example

   
2. 00:27:254 (2,1) - These stacks are really, really off in-game, after testing it few times it does look somewhat bad, mind fixing that? (Would apply to all similar cases)
3. 00:36:097 (1,2) - I'd prefer to see these notes stacked in top of 00:36:321 (3) - , due to the fact that these have quite a lot of spacing now and it doesn't reflect well to the song and your earlier spacing usage. And besides, it'd feel a bit more consistent with 00:37:888 (1,2,3) - , which is always a plus side if you ask me.
4. 00:39:455 (1) - I dislike this slider because it ignores the vocals and it ends on the stanza which never feels right to ignore, however this case was different. It played rather well but I still would like to see a 1/2 slider with a note there, probably just me though. Or even better, you could mix up some rhythm there, here is some examples
   
   Example 1

   
   Example 2

   
   Example 3

   
5. 00:57:814 (1) - Every kiai has a surprisingly low spacing compared to what you've mapped earlier. It plays well but I was expecting a bit more spacing in the choruses, it'd be awfully lot of work so I wont rant about anything spacing-related in kiai's, your choice whether to buff them or not
6. 01:26:470 (1) - Eh, ending the kiai here feels a bit weird, this part still seems to be as intense as your kiai so moving it to 01:31:843 (1) - here wouldn't be bad at all, again, might be just me
7. 03:40:799 (1,1,1,1) - If you can, try to provide bigger spacing for these, it was kind of dull to play due to the fact that these are almost side-by-side
8. Absolutely stunning, this Insane flows really, really, really well and you managed to keep it great looking, I'm amazed. This is seriously the best Insane I've seen for a while, you kept it really interesting for players too!

1. +1 OD +1 HP, then you'd have a lot better, logical difficulty settings throughout the mapset.
2. Stunning piece of work, only thing that bothered me was you didn't introduce any triplets for Hard players which feels weird. Insane has (almost) 12 long note streams while Hard doesn't have a SINGLE triplet, you might go around your Hard difficulty and search for 1/4 repeat sliders, remove some of them and add some triplets to balance the gap.

1. Didn't find anything that would've been worth mentioning, sorry. ;w;

• 
  are you really sure that you need both timingpoints? i mean, the difference is just only -4 ms
  add "SAO II" to the tags, aswell as "2", because not everyone searches for "II"

• 04:02:963 (3) - although the spacing is correct, while playing (also with DT) i both time almost hit too early. im sure that normal-players will definitively break combo here. it just looks so damn close to the previous object imo. consider using some slider(s)/reverse-slider(s) or stack it on 04:03:411 (4).

• 02:25:351 (7) - it may seems fine the way it is, but when i just played (also with DT) without paying much attention i totally ignored this circle. it fits so much better with the music, when its stacked on 02:25:575 (1).
  02:39:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - http://puu.sh/bgOjH/07b3f4cbce.jpg played better this way for me (ctrl+g 02:40:575 (2) and 02:41:470 (1) as well as 02:41:246 (3,2). move 02:42:142 (2) under the stream so its a blanket. ctrl+g 02:42:366 (3,4,5,6,7).
  thats what i basically did)
  02:43:933 (4,5) - flows really bad for me (i am left-handed tablet player! never ask me for flow xD.-> i also mirrored it for testing). i know this is an odd suggestion then but it seems fine for me, when its stacked on the slider-head of 02:43:485 (3)
  02:44:605 (6,7) - ctrl+g them maybe? i might have a very weird opinion about flow, i know^^

litoluna wrote:

Me~losan

[Normal]

1. 01:10:127 (3) - 始端部分にバスドラの音がないと思うのでfinish外したほうがスネアのclap音が映えるかも 聞き比べた感じ今の方が”””強調”””されてる感じが出てイイ感じだと思うので今のままで行こうと思います。
2. 02:01:843 (5) - 低めのタム音が鳴っていると思うのでAdditions DrumのFinish合いそう。DrumのSamplesetが好きじゃないのであんまり使わないようにしてます。
3. 02:22:664 (2) - 01:10:127 (3) - ここの部分と同じです。同じです
4. 02:30:724 (3) - ^　^
5. 03:17:515 (2) - 終端部分にスネア音が鳴ってるのでclapのほうが合いそうです Ok.
6. 03:19:306 (1,2,3,4) - 03:19:306 (1,2) - でvocalをfollowしてると思うのですが、03:20:649 - のバスドラ音をとってあげたほうが03:20:873 (3) - のbeatが変わる部分に入りやすいかなと感じました。確かにVocal無視した方が合いますねありがとうございます
   idea
   
   SPOILER

   

   

BG案o.o

SPOILER

ﾝﾝﾝ...コレ！っていうBG見つからなかった

ED初めて聴いたけどｲｲｯｽﾈｺﾚ。
頑張って~

Asphyxia wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:07:221 (4,1) - The movement wasn't really the best here, don't get me wrong here, it was great but the straight slider breaks the awesome flow. Could you consider re-arranging accordingly to this picture? I feel like it'd improve it a lot; Fixed.
   
   Example

   
2. 00:27:254 (2,1) - These stacks are really, really off in-game, after testing it few times it does look somewhat bad, mind fixing that? (Would apply to all similar cases) Alrighty.
3. 00:36:097 (1,2) - I'd prefer to see these notes stacked in top of 00:36:321 (3) - , due to the fact that these have quite a lot of spacing now and it doesn't reflect well to the song and your earlier spacing usage. And besides, it'd feel a bit more consistent with 00:37:888 (1,2,3) - , which is always a plus side if you ask me. Ok.
4. 00:39:455 (1) - I dislike this slider because it ignores the vocals and it ends on the stanza which never feels right to ignore, however this case was different. It played rather well but I still would like to see a 1/2 slider with a note there, probably just me though. Or even better, you could mix up some rhythm there, here is some examples I couldn't come up with something I can be satisfied with. I'll keep thinkin of it but the current pattern is somehow nice in my eyes and represents pefectly how i feel the melody.
   
   Example 1

   
   Example 2

   
   Example 3

   
5. 00:57:814 (1) - Every kiai has a surprisingly low spacing compared to what you've mapped earlier. It plays well but I was expecting a bit more spacing in the choruses, it'd be awfully lot of work so I wont rant about anything spacing-related in kiai's, your choice whether to buff them or not It's kinda part of my style, I don't want kiai sections to be extremely hard while the rest is relaxing. I will consider your suggestion next time but this time I will keep it as it is.
6. 01:26:470 (1) - Eh, ending the kiai here feels a bit weird, this part still seems to be as intense as your kiai so moving it to 01:31:843 (1) - here wouldn't be bad at all, again, might be just me The part after the kiai sections doesn't feel like kiai, it's maybe just me but I like the way it is now.
7. 03:40:799 (1,1,1,1) - If you can, try to provide bigger spacing for these, it was kind of dull to play due to the fact that these are almost side-by-side I intentionally made it amazingly so damn freakin boring in order to differentiate it from the next part. :>
8. Absolutely stunning, this Insane flows really, really, really well and you managed to keep it great looking, I'm amazed. This is seriously the best Insane I've seen for a while, you kept it really interesting for players too! Thx!

[Hard]

1. +1 OD +1 HP, then you'd have a lot better, logical difficulty settings throughout the mapset.
2. Stunning piece of work, only thing that bothered me was you didn't introduce any triplets for Hard players which feels weird. Insane has (almost) 12 long note streams while Hard doesn't have a SINGLE triplet, you might go around your Hard difficulty and search for 1/4 repeat sliders, remove some of them and add some triplets to balance the gap. The only thing which made me want to let this difficulty be that easy is the difficulty spread. I've only mapped I-H-N and the Insane isn't hard in comparison to general insane level, thus i think this difficulty should be easier than general as well

[Normal]

1. Didn't find anything that would've been worth mentioning, sorry. ;w;

Best set I've seen in a LONG time, really, it's really beautiful, every difficulty flows nicely, everything looks polished already. You're free to call me back once this set is 7~14 days old, get more mods o/ Good luck for now~

phaZ wrote:

[General]

• 
  are you really sure that you need both timingpoints? i mean, the difference is just only -4 ms No idea, still looking for suggestions/opinions.
  add "SAO II" to the tags, aswell as "2", because not everyone searches for "II" Added.

[Normal]

• 04:02:963 (3) - although the spacing is correct, while playing (also with DT) i both time almost hit too early. im sure that normal-players will definitively break combo here. it just looks so damn close to the previous object imo. consider using some slider(s)/reverse-slider(s) or stack it on 04:03:411 (4). Oh yeah, you got a point. Rearranged the pattern and it should be ok now.

[Insane]

• 02:25:351 (7) - it may seems fine the way it is, but when i just played (also with DT) without paying much attention i totally ignored this circle. it fits so much better with the music, when its stacked on 02:25:575 (1). Sorry but I really like the way it flows and looks. :<
  02:39:903 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - http://puu.sh/bgOjH/07b3f4cbce.jpg played better this way for me (ctrl+g 02:40:575 (2) and 02:41:470 (1) as well as 02:41:246 (3,2). move 02:42:142 (2) under the stream so its a blanket. ctrl+g 02:42:366 (3,4,5,6,7).
  thats what i basically did) Hmm although your suggested pattern flows nicely and fun to play, I'm actually loving the current catchy flow. I believe it's fine the way it is now.
  02:43:933 (4,5) - flows really bad for me (i am left-handed tablet player! never ask me for flow xD.-> i also mirrored it for testing). i know this is an odd suggestion then but it seems fine for me, when its stacked on the slider-head of 02:43:485 (3) I believe the stack can emphasize the next heavy beat. Probably the current one flows though, I will keep it as it is until I can come up with something cool. ><
  02:44:605 (6,7) - ctrl+g them maybe? i might have a very weird opinion about flow, i know^^ I think yours also flows nicely but I like the current one better. xD

very good mapset, everything looks like its in final stage^^

1. How about adding "Full Size" "Ending" to the tags o.o

1. 00:16:620 (1,2) - I highly suggest you removing the whistles on the slider's repeat, since it don't really fit with music
2. 00:23:784 (1,2) - ^
3. 00:50:649 (1) - how about using ctrl+g on this slider it'll follow much better, and it'll make nice small jump with your patterns o.o
4. 04:11:694 (2) - ^
5. 04:48:858 (1) - ^

Sekai-nyan wrote:

Moe Melo o3o/

General:

1. How about adding "Full Size" "Ending" to the tags o.o Added "Ending", but I'm not sure about "Full Size". lol

Hard:

1. 00:16:620 (1,2) - I highly suggest you removing the whistles on the slider's repeat, since it don't really fit with music Alright
2. 00:23:784 (1,2) - ^ ^
3. 00:50:649 (1) - how about using ctrl+g on this slider it'll follow much better, and it'll make nice small jump with your patterns o.o Hmm honestly it doesn't flow nicely imo.
4. 04:11:694 (2) - ^ Fixed this one.
5. 04:48:858 (1) - ^ A jump here doesn't give me a good feeling. xD

Didn't really find much, since this map is already good and ready for ranking...Melo so pro orz =3=/ or i'm just being lazy as always lol

Gamu wrote:

こんにちは～✧ヾ(❀╹◡╹)ﾉﾞ

[ General]

1. 2nd season をTagsに入れてみてはどうでしょうか。GuyさんのOP譜面にはありますし、結構入れてる人もいます。

[ Insane]

1. 00:47:515 (3,4) - (3)が(2)の方によってたり、(4)が(1)と少し重なっているのはどうも見た目がちょっと悪いと思います。それに、綺麗な譜面を作っていますし、もったいないと思います。特に、私には何の形を作ろうとしているのかわからないので、配置の提案をします。(3)をx:236 y:188, (4)を140:348に移動させてみてはどうでしょうか。これのほうが今よりも、見た目も良いですし、流れも良いと思います。
   
   image

   
2. 00:55:799 (1) - 00:56:470 (2)と音が同じにきこえるので、終点にfinishを加えてもいいかも。
3. 01:02:515 (3) - 終点にclapの音がないのはなんか変に感じます。曲にしっかりとスネア音が鳴ってますし、入れないのはもったいない気がします。 入れ忘れだと思います。
4. 01:16:843 (3) - ^
5. 01:18:858 (5) - ここは始点と中点にclapかな。
6. 01:26:470 (1) - 始点にclapも入れるために、normal-hitclapにsoft-hitclapと同じ音を入れるのはどうでしょうか。２番の最後のサビでも同じく。
7. 01:28:261 (1) - ^
8. 01:30:052 (1) - ^
9. 02:15:948 (4) - １番[00:55:351 (4)]ではclapを入れてるのに、ここではfinishが主な音になってます。両方とも同じ音が鳴ってるように聞こえますのでどっちかに合わせたほうが良いと思います。私だったら１番の方に合わせます。
10. 02:21:993 (1) - 終点にもclapを入れてみてはどうですか。次の(2)でclapを強調させたい（？）のはわかりますが、ここにもclapを入れても問題はないと思います。(2)のclapだけ音量を+10%させるのもありだと思います。もしくは、前にも書きましたが、soft-hitclapと同じ音をnormal-hitclapに入れれば、この部分をFinishとclap（Additions:Normal)だけにすればかなり強調されると思います。
11. 02:30:500 (5) - 上と似たような感じで、ここにもclapを。
12. 02:43:933 (4,7) - この二つにclapを入れても問題はないと思います。
13. 02:46:620 (7,8) - １番[01:26:023 (6,7,8)]と同じにしたほうがいいかも？ 全く違う音ではないと思いますので。
14. 02:52:217 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - この部分すごい好き。
15. 03:13:261 (3) - 終点にfinish入れてもいいと思います。03:13:709 (1,2)と同じ音があります。
16. 03:15:388 (7) - ここだけ抜けているのは変に感じたので、finishを入れてみてください。
17. 03:17:067 (3) - ここにもfinish. 次の音と同じ音が鳴っているように聞こえたので。
18. 03:18:858 (5) - ^
19. 03:53:784 (2) - スネア音があるのに、clap入れないのはなんか変に感じます。入れてみてはどうしょうか。
20. 03:56:470 (8) - ^
21. 04:44:493 (4) - ^
22. 04:51:769 (1) - 終点を音量40%にするといい感じのfinish音が鳴って、気持ちよく終わることができると思います。

Normal,Hardは飛ばしても構わないということなので、Insaneだけ見ました。

本当にいい譜面です～:D

1. とりあえずInsaneだけみました...Normal Hard modが必要ならまた呼んでください・・・

1. 00:32:291 (5) - Clapが抜けているので追加してください
2. 00:54:567 - 02:15:164 - この2箇所add noteしませんか？00:54:567 - のほうは少し配置を弄らないとnote置くことは少し難しいかもしれませんが、合うと思います
3. 01:07:776 (3,4) - 4番のwhistleをremove. 3,4はおそらくClapになると思います
4. 01:11:246 (6) - ここにClapも追加しませんか？歌詞にあわせて 01:10:799 (2,6,10) - この３箇所にClapがあるとリズム良く叩きやすくなると思います
5. 01:17:291 (4,1) - 歌詞に合わせるならCtrl+Gした音取りのほうが合います、そのままでも大丈夫です(似た様な箇所 02:37:888 (4,1) - 04:19:978 (4,1) -
6. 02:07:440 (8) - X:356 Y:32に移動しませんか？02:06:993 (6,7,8,1,3) - ここで５角形作っても綺麗なんですがかなり配置が壊れてしまうので 02:07:440 (8) - だけをX:356 Y:32に移動すると 02:07:217 (7,8,1,2) - ここで綺麗な台形が作れるしDSも1.2で統一されるのでより良くなると思います
   
   img

   
7. 02:12:814 (1) - おそらくClapが抜けていると思います
8. 02:26:694 (3) - 頭のほうにAdd whistle? それらしい音もありますし、１番サビでは似たような音で追加されていました(参考 01:06:097 (3) -
9. 02:28:933 (9) - 1番ではFinishではなくてWhistleが入っていました、どちらかに統一したほうがいいかもしれません、音もおそらく同じなので
10. 02:31:843 (6) - 01:11:246 (6) - こちらと同じ提案です
11. 02:42:142 (2) - X:192 Y332に移動 02:41:246 (3,1) - ここの流れがDS1.2なので 02:42:142 (2,3) - こちらも1.2に、また３角形の形も整えられると思います
    
    img

    
12. 02:42:814 (7) - これだけ下に下がりすぎで少しゆがんで見えました、よければ使ってください( 02:42:366 (3,4,5,6,7) - この部分
    

    284,288,162367,5,2,0:0:0:0:
    313,271,162478,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    346,264,162590,1,4,0:0:0:0:
    380,267,162702,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    411,281,162814,1,2,0:0:0:0:

13. 02:42:814 (7,8) - 同じ箇所の指摘ですが、ここはWhistleよりFinishの音のほうが合うと思います
14. 02:43:933 (4) - Clap 02:44:605 (6) - Finish 02:44:829 (7) - Clap おそらくこの３箇所は全てつけ忘れだと思いました
15. 02:45:052 (1) - スライダーの後ろにバックメロディに沿ってWhistleも追加しませんか？
16. 02:52:217 (1) - 手前と同じ音が鳴っているのでここもWhistleが入るはずです
17. 03:11:918 (4) - ここのWhistleは恐らくミス？それらしい音も入ってませんし、付いてないほうがフィットしているように思えました
18. 03:13:261 (3) - スライダーの後ろにFinishの入れ忘れでしょうか？
19. 03:16:396 (2,3,4) - 始点全てにFinishの入れ忘れ？どっちでもいいかも・・・
20. 03:20:649 (5) - WhistleよりFinishのほうが音に合ってると思います
21. 03:24:455 (1) - 後ろの音に沿ってWhistleを追加？
22. 03:38:560 (5) - Finishの入れ忘れ？
23. 03:41:470 (1,1,1) - Volumeが一定より音に合わせて 80% 60% 50%等変えてあげるとより良くなると思います
24. 03:47:963 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - 03:48:635 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - ここの２箇所だけ流れが逆のほうがいいと思いました、主観なのでどちらでも
25. 04:11:246 (1) - Naziだけど2grid下げたら 04:10:799 (4,5,1) - ここのDSが統一されると思います
26. 04:34:194 (9) - ストリームの中でここだけRemove noteしたほうがメロディに沿ってて叩きやすいと思いました、Clapが入るような音も恐らくないですが、このままでも大丈夫です
27. 04:44:381 (3) - Finishの入れ忘れ？

配置に関しては何も言うことないです!! Nice map

1. I'm also unsure about your timing, since the ¨Tv Size¨ use 2 lines, but the change is really noticeable, which is not the case here... but probably the second line is necessary. So better ask to a timing expert
2. Well since you are looking for a new BG, I found one, that I feel fit the song better than your current one:
   
   SPOILER

   

1. 00:08:788 (5) - nothing wrong about this, just suggesting to use 3 circles instead? following the vocals like you was doing before in 00:07:893 (2,3,4) - I feel circles represent better the song, maybe just me
2. 00:24:232 (2) - stack this with 00:23:336 (7) - your diff will look cleanner, pluse the distance between 00:23:784 (1,2,3) - will be the same
3. 00:41:694 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,4) - this part plays awesome
4. 00:57:366 just wondering why you didn't map the stream here? In my opinion it fit with the instruments coming back after the a capella part
5. 01:13:485 (5) - I don't like how this slider play here, talking about the rhythm, I prefer if you map this one like the second kiai in 02:34:082 (5,1,2,3) - , something like this:
   
6. 01:33:187 (4) - nothing wrong about your rhythm, but personally I don't like to map important beats like the one in 01:33:635 - as slider tails, since that important beat require a click able action IMO, why not adding a 3/4 slider and then a circle? I can listen music in 01:33:523 -, something like this:
   
7. 02:53:784 (1) - similar as above, also I like this slowdown it fit the music perfectly, why you didn't the same in 01:33:187 (3) - ?
8. 03:40:799 (1,1,1,1) - nice idea, what about to gradually increase the sv of each slider? will make a better emphasis with the music, also will be fun to play IMO
9. 03:44:381 (1,1,1,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - personally not a fan of the combo spam, but this one fit the music pretty nice though o:

1. 00:07:445 (1,3) - make them symmetrical? (talking about the position of the sliders in ¨y¨) just for a better design
2. 00:25:799 in the insane diff you have whistle + finish here and in hard just whistle, maybe missing finish?
3. 00:57:366 same suggestion as the Insane diff
4. 01:12:030 unnecessary green line, not important, but doesn't hurt to delete the unnecessary ones
5. 02:53:784 (1) - I like this slowdown it fit the music perfectly, why you didn't the same in 01:33:187 (3) - ?
6. 03:40:799 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - really nice, GJ
7. 04:43:933 (2,3) - sorry nazi, stack them properly, unless is on purpose

1. 00:20:202 (1,2,3) - adjust the pattern to be symmetric? something like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
2. I notice some combo inconsistencys in the kiai, dunno if them are on purpose or not, but I prefer if you keep your every two stanzas combo patttern, anyways I'll post them c:
   
   SPOILER

   00:59:605 Remove NC
   01:03:187 ^
   01:17:515 ^
   01:28:261 (1) - ^
   01:31:843 (1) - ^ note: I know is for the sv change, but also I'm not sure to have ¨sv changes¨ in the easy diff of the set, consider this too.
   02:48:858 remove NC
   02:52:440 (1) - ^ also same as 01:31:843
   04:09:455 (1) - remove NC
   04:30:948 ^
   04:34:530 (1) - ^ also same as 01:31:843
3. 01:26:470 (1,2,3,4) - I prefer if you avoid this kind of patterns for this diff, they can be really confused to play for new players (since you don't have an easy diff)
4. 02:47:067 (1,2,3,4) - same as above
5. 04:07:664 (1,2,3,4) - ^
   04:29:157 (1,2,3,4) - ^
   

1

2

3

1. 02:07:664 (3) - 終点にclap?
2. 03:11:694 (3) - clapの付け忘れていませんか？
3. 04:01:620 (2) - 終点にclap?
4. 04:02:963 (3) - finishとかどうでしょう？ 後ろで音が鳴っているので何もないのには違和感がありました。
5. 04:06:545 (3) - ここの始点、Drum-clapとか合うと思います。
6. 04:23:112 (2) - 細かいことですが、x:184,y:296まで下げた方が自然なブランケットを作れます。
7. 04:34:530 (1) - 1番と同じようにブランケットを作ってみては？
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 04:40:351 (2) - clap抜けかも？

1. 00:23:784 (1) - ここの終点はまだスネアの音が鳴っているのでclap付けた方が曲とマッチします。
   04:48:858 (1) - ^
2. 02:30:500 (4) - x:348,y:344へ移動して多少ジャンプさせるのはどうでしょう？ 02:30:724 - がより強調されると思います

1. 00:47:067 (1,2) - ctrl + Gした方が個人的にやり易かったです
2. 01:02:515 (3) - 終点のclapがないのは付け忘れでしょうか？
3. 01:07:776 (3) - clapとかどうですか？
4. 01:16:843 (3) - ここの終点も付け忘れ？
5. 01:54:903 (8) - 少ししつこく聞こえたのでwhistleいらない気がします。
6. 02:45:612 - 後ろのピアノの音に沿って連打を置いているならここにもnoteが欲しいです。
7. 03:12:814 (2) - ctrl + Gするとより流れが良くると思います。
8. 03:38:112 (3,4) - 後ろの音に合わせて(3)の終点と4にclap入れませんか？

Frostmourne wrote:

FULL VER <3

no star but take all of my wishes

Frostmourne wrote:

hype hype hype
hype hype hype
hype hype hype
hype hype hype