This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Sunday, October 19, 2014 at 10:42:11 AM

Artist: u's
Title: Bokura no LIVE Kimi to no LIFE
Source: Love Live! School idol project
Tags: ラブライブ! 1st season insert song Best Album Collection Xinely 高坂穂乃果 Kousaka Honoka 園田海未 Sonoda Umi 南ことり Minami Kotori 矢澤にこ Yazawa Niko Nico 絢瀬絵里 Ayase Eri Eli 東條希 Toujou Nozomi 西木野真姫 Nishikino Maki 小泉花陽 Koizumi Hanayo 星空凛 Hoshizora Rin 新田恵海 Nitta Emi 三森すずこ Mimori Suzuko 内田彩 Uchida Aya 徳井青空 Tokui Sora 南條愛乃 Nanjou Yoshino 楠田亜衣奈 Kusuda Aina 堀絵梨子 Hori Eriko Pile 久保ユリカ Kubo Yurika 飯田里穂 Iida Riho Muse
BPM: 210
Filesize: 9325kb
Play Time: 05:16
Difficulties Available:

1. Affection (5.98 stars, 1274 notes)

Download: u's - Bokura no LIVE Kimi to no LIFE
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
210 BPM HYPE

SB by Xinely.

Since you requested a mod in #modreqs, here I am


NOTE: these are only suggestions. That's why almost always I didn't give any reason of my choices. So I'd be satisfied just with having you keeping my suggestions in mind
Either the song and the map are awesome. I can't wait to see this ranked, good luck

[-MrSergio-] wrote:

Since you requested a mod in #modreqs, here I am

[Affection]

00:02:199 (4) - Maybe convert it into two normal beats...? Also I think it should be the start of a new combo (I mean the first beat) The instrument that plays at the beginning and the end of the slider is "connected", thus the usage of the slider. And I'm simply following how the music goes here for the combo.
00:03:627 (4) - I think it should go in the previous combo Sure.
00:34:627 (1) - Maybe in the previous combo Nope; we're on a new stanza here in the song, so...
00:36:199 (4) - ctrl+G With the movement you need from 00:35:627 (1,2,3), it'd create an awkward flow if I were to Ctrl+G this.
00:40:342 (1) - Maybe in the previous combo Nope; same reason as 00:34:627 (1).
00:52:913 (1) - Same ^ ^
You didn't stacked properly 01:17:913 (4) with 01:18:913 (5) (maybe they're too far, but there's still a difference) No, they won't make a difference. It's been so far between them that this will not make any effect anymore.
01:45:913 (2,3,4) - To arrive here the player needs to make a very big jump. Due to this I think it would fit better a slider instead, or at least put them in line and not stacked I personally feel that the massive jumps here fit with the strength of the song, but hey, I'll reconsider.
03:15:770 (1) - ctrl+H and ctrl+J . Then replace the start where it was (?) Explanation: Uh no; it'll break the flow to 03:16:056 (2), making this part uncomfortable to play.
-->
03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe stupid, but I see them better this way: I just asked captin to test an hour ago and he suggested the similar thing to me. I tried to fit 1/4 sliders and patterns and stuff in, but they just... don't fit with the song and how the map is constructed. Because of this, I have decided not to use them.
-->
03:28:770 (4) - Maybe stack it on top of (1) of the same combo Sure.
03:51:913 (4) - Maybe moved to (352;224) (x;y) I feel that it's more fitting to stack this below the previous circle due to how the vocal goes.
03:53:199 (1) - I think this is done on symmetrical purpose and not on stacking purpose. I mean: since I saw it wasn't stacked well I tried to understand your reasons and looks fine also for me Haha, yeah. I never wanted to stack this. It's okay as is.
04:22:484 (2) - Not stacked properly Fixed.
04:29:627 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Maybe the same as 03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) Nope; you should know my reason now.
05:01:199 (2) and 05:02:056 (1) aren't stacked well Not gonna be visible; actually, so uh.
05:16:342 (4) - Maybe change it:
-->
I think this fits better the song There isn't any notable instrument sound at 05:16:484, thus the usage of a 1/1 slider.

NOTE: these are only suggestions. That's why almost always I didn't give any reason of my choices. So I'd be satisfied just with having you keeping my suggestions in mind
Either the song and the map are awesome. I can't wait to see this ranked, good luck

Thank you! And I hope to see this ranked too~

Also thanks to captin for testing, and also for the star. Made the transition to streams smoother, I guess.

As requested. I think. lol.

Whoever maps the best song of µ's deserves a mod.



Low quality mod. orz. GL!

Mira-san wrote:

As requested. I think. lol.

Whoever maps the best song of µ's deserves a mod.

General

Finish the SB lel. I also suggest using a better font for the Latin text. Everything is up to Xinely for this lol

Affection

I see that you're hard-set on not following the vocals. huhu. I am still following the vocals, but I do focus on the instruments.

01:15:056 (4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - The shape of this stream can be improved. Fixed, hopfeully.
03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Suggesting this from others lelele.


But then again, if it's not really possible then ok. Nope. I already decided not to use this kind of pattern.
03:27:056 (4,1) - Not a straight flow. Straightened I guess.
04:20:770 - I don't see why there would be no note here. There are similar points within the song that has notes. :< Sure.
04:30:056 (1) - Rotate by -9 degrees using Selection Centre? Cool. Done!

Low quality mod. orz. GL!

Thank you!

WOW


＼:D /

i forgot how 2 mod


Klo menurutku ada beberapa stack yg rasanya aneh, soalnya berkesan ngeemphasize beat yg salah. 00:29:913 (5,1) - misalnya.. kan jadi kerasa yang dapet emphasize nya jump dari (4) ke (5) padahal downbeatnya itu di (1) ._.
00:34:627 (1,2) - satu" nya anti-jump.. just mentioning, consider perfect stack instead >< or.. add more pattern like this lmao

Baru nyadar nggak ada spinner nya sama sekali.. coba add plg nggak 1 ah buat score variasi. guide line jg kan w

Good Luck !

Yo, from my Modding Queue

This is a super fun map to play, with lots of distance snapping changes, which I love in extra diffs.
To be honest I thought I was playing a ranked map when I was playing this the first time, it's of that high quality (apart from a few things I noticed here and there). However I don't know how easily this is going to be ranked as it only has 1 standard diff, but it is definitely worthy in my books

[Affection]

Sorry it's quite a small mod but that's because I love this map already and I really look forward to it getting ranked so I can get that pp

GOOD LUCK HINSVAR!

aaaa, sorry double post I don't know how to delete it ;;

[Affection]

Hurray for 5am mods ヽ(‘ ∇‘ )ノ

00:19:056 (2) - Stack this with 00:17:627 (2) - head maybe?
00:22:342 (2,1) - Stack 1 with 2's head
00:30:484 (2,3) - Stack 3 with 2's head
00:32:913 (3) - Same thing here^
00:34:913 (2,4) - Stack 4 with 2's head
00:53:484 (3,4) - Try to make 4 end land on 3? Nvm i see why you did that now
00:57:913 (2,1) - Stack 1 with 2
01:10:627 (3,2) - Stack 2 with 3
01:27:770 (4,1) - Stack 1 on 4's head
01:47:199 (3,4) - Stack 4 with 3's head
01:46:913 (2,3) - Stack 3 with 2's head
02:06:484 (2,3) - You could make this stack better
02:20:770 (1,1) - Stack red 1 on blue 1
02:27:770 (1,2) - Stack 2 on 1
02:41:342 (1,2) - Stack right here isn't perf
03:08:770 (4,2) - Stack 2's end with 4 maybe
03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dubudubudubudubu
03:34:770 (4,3) - Stack 3's head with 4
03:52:342 (1,1) - Stack purple 1 on red one perfectly

Welp that's it for my mod. Couldn't find anything else to nitpick. Good luck

Momochikun wrote:

i forgot how 2 mod qe

1. 00:03:627 (4) - Ini drum clap di akhir bener" gk pas.. klo mau ikutin instrumen di musiknya drum sampleset doang kyknya ud cukup. Bknnya bakal lbih cocok disini 00:04:627 (3) - ya ? :3 Bener juga sih. Done!
2. 00:15:770 (3) - Di part ini bukannya whistle cmn khusus emphasize trompet doang ya ? dan disini kebetulan gak ada trompet jadi agak aneh. klo replace whistle ny ke 00:16:056 (4) - aja gimana ? ^
3. 00:21:627 (5,6,7,1) - Weird rhythm.. try image below sir ;w; Hmm.... Pokoknya coba ritme lain deh.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:24:056 (1) - Berhubung gak ada suara di bgm.. reverse samplesetnya di ganti soft aja mungkin ? Oke.
5. 00:27:484 (2,1) - Ini bener" gk kliatan klo 1/4 lol.. di tumpuk dikit aja biar ada kesan kesan 1/4 nya gitu lol Ini dipertimbangin deh nanti. So far rasanya enak-enak aja sih; masih kebaca karena di (2) ada tick itu dan karena AR-nya juga.
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 00:28:199 (2,3) - Transisinya sekilas nggak natural berhubung (2) letaknya nggak sinkron sama (1) trus (3) nya terlalu ke atas jadi gak match shape nya 4. coba di arrange dikit Done. Kind of.
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:57:913 (2) - Missing finish at slider-end ? Ups.
8. 01:02:056 (2) - Aneh rasanya ini lol.. di ganti single note di 01:02:199 - yang ngestack aja biar efeknya keren ? atau 1/1 slider mulai 01:01:913 (1) - jg bakal lbih cocok menurutku Done.
9. 01:33:627 (1) - Normal sampleset aja.. lagian ini stream nya jg ud mulai kok Stream emang udah mulai, tapi musiknya sendiri masih lemah di sini.
10. 01:46:484 (7,1) - Kyknya mendingan 1/1 slider dari sini deh biar ikut vocal.. dan patternya rasanya jg bakal cocok sama 01:45:484 (1) - yg jg ngikutin vocal well let's stack
11. 01:37:484 (1,1) - whistle nya tarik mundur 1/2 aja lbih cocok sm terompet di bg. ah iya jg berlaku buat similiar part di next kiai lol Done.
12. 02:01:627 (2) - Ctrl J ? Kenapa? IMO flow-nya bagus kok, dan rasanya jadi aneh kalau di-flip vertikal.
13. 02:12:484 (2) - Delete.. nggak cover vocal maupun musik, >< kesannya malah bikin (1) dan (3,4) nya jadi gak cocok Uh, saya sendiri merasa gak ada yang salah sama ini sih, tapi lihat kata modder lain deh nanti.
14. 02:17:056 (3) - Ctrl G.. ? the current flow feels weird imo Hmm really? Saya rasa ini justru bisa memberikan variasi flow biar gak terlalu smooth gitu. Kalau dibikin nyaman terus justru yang main bakal merasa bosen.
15. 02:19:484 (4) - Ini daripada di blanket mending skalian paralel-in aja sama 02:19:770 (1) - .. lbih cool deh kayaknya Gak deh, mau ngejaga flow di sini.
16. 02:47:199 (1) - Kasih rest dikit pls... 1/1 aja lol Well karena musiknya kayak gini... Can't be helped.
17. 03:29:342 (2) - Stack with 03:27:770 (1) - instead ..? Kenapa? Saya rasa lebih pas kalau diletakin di tempat yang sekarang.
18. 03:55:770 (1) - Berhubung ada suara drum di tick merah.. di pecah jadi 1/2 sama note kyknya bakal lbih cocok sama pattern selanjutnya Drum di sini gak terdengar jelas sih, gak kayak 02:47:199 (1) yang kerasa banget, jadi...
19. 04:41:484 (1,2) - Does this really need to be stacked ? >< Yeah... untuk nekanin vokal.
20. 02:58:818 (2) - Delete whistle... maybe IMO masih diperluin buat menekankan instrumen di ini.
21. 03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 210 bpm ouch, ok nice RIP
22. 03:12:056 (4,1) - Blanket them for neater pattern.. i guess ? Done.
23. 03:24:770 (5) - Finish.. cymbal di bgm nya kedengeran, klo kerasa kekerasan di kecilin dikit volumenya aja biar pas IMO masih kurang kuat buat dikasih finish biarpun ada cymbal. Gak dulu deh.
24. 03:49:770 - Gimana klo 1/8 reverse slider aja disini buat ikutin piano nya ? buat rhythm variasi aja gitu Hmm idk why, tapi rasanya 1/8 slider di sini... bakal tabrakan sama ritme sebelum dan sesudah objeknya ._.
25. 04:00:913 (3) - Just a normal curve is better.. imo =w= Okay.
26. 05:00:770 (6) - whistle ? ^
27. 04:14:056 (1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1800045 ? huehue Waktu main gak kelihatan kok. Biarin aja deh.
28. 04:34:627 (1) - Finish.. ? Gak deh, musik di sini gak kuat-kuat amat.

Klo menurutku ada beberapa stack yg rasanya aneh, soalnya berkesan ngeemphasize beat yg salah. 00:29:913 (5,1) - misalnya.. kan jadi kerasa yang dapet emphasize nya jump dari (4) ke (5) padahal downbeatnya itu di (1) ._. Bingung juga sih, soalnya vokal sama instrumen kayak gini...
00:34:627 (1,2) - satu" nya anti-jump.. just mentioning, consider perfect stack instead >< or.. add more pattern like this lmao Stacked.

Baru nyadar nggak ada spinner nya sama sekali.. coba add plg nggak 1 ah buat score variasi. guide line jg kan w Gak ada tempat yang pas i cri

Good Luck !

sullyjhf wrote:

Yo, from my Modding Queue

This is a super fun map to play, with lots of distance snapping changes, which I love in extra diffs.
To be honest I thought I was playing a ranked map when I was playing this the first time, it's of that high quality (apart from a few things I noticed here and there). However I don't know how easily this is going to be ranked as it only has 1 standard diff, but it is definitely worthy in my books

[Affection]

1. There are some weird timing parts of this: 02:09:342 (1,2,3) for example, that are quite hard to read on a first play, I would suggest moving these further apart. I personally find this to be easily readable, but I guess I'll wait for the other modders to see if they have a comment on this or not.
   02:37:342 (3,4) - This is a good use of the spacing, as you have to move up to hit the first one and then down to get the next one, so even though the gap isn't too big, it seems like it's bigger. \o/
   02:09:627 (2) - Maybe move this up a bit. Why? It's intended to be in line with 02:09:342 (1,3).
2. 01:04:342 (1) - Change to soft hitsounds from this point until here 01:11:199 (1) I find Normal to be quite fitting honestly, so uh.
3. Starting a stream on the offbeat sounds and plays strangely, you could remove the 2nd note from the stream and move the first note to somewhere else (obviously changing where the NC is), I believe it sounds better like that. I believe the stream is fine as is. Don't worry, it's fitting with the song and plays naturally.
4. 01:56:770 (3) - Maybe move this note up a tiny bit, this pattern is quite confusing. Done.
5. 02:23:770 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Could you have this whole stream at one distance snapping, making it change is hard to hit/read on a first play. Having it on the larger snapping would be better. Sure.
6. 02:48:199 (4,1) - Add quiet note between these 2 maybe, it sounds only a little weird in the current setup but I think it might benefit from a note. It would feel very forced, so I'll avoid doing that for now.
7. 02:58:627 (1,2,3,4) - I think actually having these closer together makes this triplet easier to read. I feel the opposite, though. People might misread the rhythm here if I made the spacing smaller.
8. 03:48:913 (1,2,3,4) - ^ This one not so much. \o/
9. 03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - What I said about the offbeat stream before. I will... uh, I don't know, let this be as is for now?
10. 03:57:056 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - These I feel are fine on the offbeat because of the lead up. \o/
11. 04:01:484 (1,5,6) - This is not perfect symmetry but it's very close so it doesn't matter too much. Okay~
12. 04:52:913 (1,2) - This is the only instance in the song where you use this technique of 1/4 between sliders so I suggest you remove it. The song requires me to do something like this, so...
13. 05:05:770 (2,3) - Blanket this better I'm sure enough it's already correctly blanketed.
14. 05:14:484 (1,2,3,1,2) - This feel strange but it goes along with the music and I hit it first play so it's probably fine. k!

Sorry it's quite a small mod but that's because I love this map already and I really look forward to it getting ranked so I can get that pp

GOOD LUCK HINSVAR!

chaee wrote:

[Affection]

Hurray for 5am mods ヽ(‘ ∇‘ )ノ

00:19:056 (2) - Stack this with 00:17:627 (2) - head maybe? Not gonna be visible while playing and I'll need to pour a lot of effort to something that won't be worth it if I do this, you know...
00:22:342 (2,1) - Stack 1 with 2's head ^
00:30:484 (2,3) - Stack 3 with 2's head ^
00:32:913 (3) - Same thing here^ I guess it'll be necessary here. Done.
00:34:913 (2,4) - Stack 4 with 2's head Why?
00:53:484 (3,4) - Try to make 4 end land on 3? Nvm i see why you did that now Haha.
00:57:913 (2,1) - Stack 1 with 2 Again, why? This won't be noticeable while playing.
01:10:627 (3,2) - Stack 2 with 3 ^
01:27:770 (4,1) - Stack 1 on 4's head ^
01:47:199 (3,4) - Stack 4 with 3's head ^
01:46:913 (2,3) - Stack 3 with 2's head ^
02:06:484 (2,3) - You could make this stack better Yeah, true. Fixed.
02:20:770 (1,1) - Stack red 1 on blue 1 Umm? Which red are you talking about?
02:27:770 (1,2) - Stack 2 on 1 Won't be noticeable while playing.
02:41:342 (1,2) - Stack right here isn't perf What stack? o.o
03:08:770 (4,2) - Stack 2's end with 4 maybe Nope; you should know the reason now.
03:18:770 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - dubudubudubudubu huehuehue
03:34:770 (4,3) - Stack 3's head with 4 Yeah, not gonna change this too because... you know.
03:52:342 (1,1) - Stack purple 1 on red one perfectly ^

Welp that's it for my mod. Couldn't find anything else to nitpick. Good luck

Thank you, guys!

Momochikun wrote:

i forgot how 2 mod

i don't know how 2 mod
Fun fact : sambil ngmod gw mikir kapan lagunya slesai

[Drums of something]

Kalo ada yang ketinggalan ntar gw chat deh
Gl~

Very good usage of Hitsounds.

00:36:913 (1) - Make the part after the red point a little more curved
00:55:199 (1) - Suggestion: Why not trying moving the slider so that the red point is in the center of the first combo circle 00:54:056 (1)?
01:12:342 (1) - Why not something like this to make the slider look more pleasant?:


01:17:913 (4) - Move to: x:168, y: 112
02:39:627 (2,3) - Move to: x: 312, y: 304
03:26:484 (2,3) - Suddenly, half beat sliders with red-points
03:35:199 (1) - I personally don't think that we need a finish here. Also Try moving the slider so that 03:34:484 (3) is at the end of the slider and 03:34:770 (4) is in the center of the red point of this slider

Can't wait to see this get approve~

Hi~
M4M here

[Affection]

03:06:342 (4) - I think if you move this one more to the top, it'll make the flow 4 and 1 better. The flow will looks more like a loop. but it will increase the jump between 4 and 1.
03:29:770 (2,4) - I think it's better to unstack them, since they have the same color and only 3/2. Also it will make it more readable.
03:46:342 (3,4) - just my opinion, but I think it flow better if you ctrl+g, if you fix this, don't forget the hitsound

A really nice diff, I love the flow !

[Drums of feelings]

00:11:342 (62,63) - I prefer to swap it, I mean change as k d. the k will follow the melody which is here 00:11:342 -
00:13:056 (72,73,74) - almost same as earlier, k d k. high pitched melody are here 00:13:056 - 00:13:342 - ; Also I think it sound pretty good with the pattern.
00:18:913 (109) - change as k ?
00:22:484 (131) - I'll prefer to delete it. I think it'll make this one 00:22:627 - sound better with the guitare
00:25:770 (149) - just my personnal opinion, but I like how it sound if you change it as k
00:27:199 (156,157) - you used big note for the strong melody, why not for this two ? Also if you want this one 00:27:484 - different from this one 00:27:770 - ; change it as big K 00:27:484 (157) -
00:40:913 (231) - change as k for the strong melody ?
00:43:342 (243) - here the melody have the same sound as here 00:43:199 (242) - ; So change this one 00:43:342 (243) - as k ?
00:45:056 (253,254,255) - I don't know why, but dkd sound good for me.
00:56:342 (322) - how about change it as k ? for the melody
00:57:913 (331,332) - change both a big D ?
01:04:413 - how about add one green line with x0,75 as SV ? I fit pretty well with the music
If you do this ^ ; it better if you add green line here 01:10:770 - (x0,81) ; 01:10:913 - (x0,87) ; 01:11:056 - (x0,93) ; Also, if you do this, I think it's better to delete this note 01:10:484 (400) -
01:15:770 (436) - change it as big D ? big K will be kinda strange to play after a ddddk
01:20:342 (463) - change as big D for the cymbal sound ?
01:50:342 (641) - change it as k ?
01:51:056 (645,647) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ?
01:52:342 - I don't know if they removed this rule, but I'm pretty sure flash kiai is forbidden on taiko diff
02:10:056 (755,756) - change both as big D ? previous note also have finish for the melody, so why not this 2 notes ?
02:37:627 (908,909) - your previous pattern is following the melody, so, change this 02:37:627 (908) - as k ?
If you fix this ^ ; this one 02:37:770 (909) - sound kinda weird to me ; delete it ?
02:39:913 (921) - change this one as k for the melody ?
02:40:770 (926) - how about change it as big K ? and this 02:41:056 (927) - as k
02:47:270 - how about add a green line x0,75 SV ?
If you fix this ^ ; it's better to add green line like previous one
And also, if you add'd this SV change, I think it's better to delete this note 02:53:342 (996) -
03:19:056 (1154) - change it as k ?
03:23:770 (1183) - change it as big D for cymbal sound ?
03:36:199 (1257,1259) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ?
03:37:484 - same as earlier for flash
04:10:770 (1459,1461) - add finish to both ?
04:47:056 (1679,1681) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ?
05:09:627 (1820) - the high pitched guitare sound is here, change it as k ?

For this diff, I'll say it's a Muzukashii+ or soft Oni, but I think it's a Oni 7★
I'm pretty sure it's your 1st, or one of your 1st taiko diff. Some thing can be improved, but it's not a bad one, it's actually a nice relaxing one.

Good luck ! hope to see this ranked soon ! \o

Senritsu wrote:

Momochikun wrote:

i forgot how 2 mod

i don't know how 2 mod
Fun fact : sambil ngmod gw mikir kapan lagunya slesai

[Drums of something]
*Drums of moeness

SPOILER

00:08:199 (42) - kat, nyamain rhythm di 00:05:913 (28) - Done.
00:09:342 (50,51,52,53) - prefer this as k D d k though. lebih enak dimainin ^
00:18:913 (109) - ada clap, ganti ke kat. ^
00:20:056 (116) - gak mau dijadiin kat aja biar patternnya terkesan simpel + konstan? ^
00:20:913 (122,123) - mereka berdua pitch gitarnya sama, jadi dua"nya kat aja daripada k lalu d ^ (all k)
00:37:199 (210) - kedengeran kaya clap ketimbang drum menurutku, ganti ke kat? ^
01:56:484 (673) - kat? karna kalo didengerin baik" di musiknya ada suara asdfnya, tapi bukan asdf yang kuat, cuma ringan. sama kaya 01:56:342 (672) - ^
02:01:770 coba kasih kat di sini. berenti di red line itu janggal banget, ya beberapa doang sih . . ^
02:03:484 (718) - ganti ke kat, di musiknya ada semacam clap atau asdf lah itu `` ^
02:24:627 (833,834,835,836,837,838,839,840,841,842,843,844,845,846) - pas'in sama bassnya aja, jadi ddkddd kdddkddkd? 1/2 did stuff by myself kthx.
02:40:627 (927,928) - swap buat ngikutin vokalnya? Done.
02:46:484 kasih d di sini, lalu ganti 02:46:627 (961) - ke kat? buat ngikutin musiknya sih ^
02:50:342 (983,984) - swap buat ngikutin bassnya ^
03:00:484 (1043,1044,1045,1046,1047) - ganti ke ddkkd buat ganti suasana + ngikutin vokalnya yang tiba" muncul di 03:00:627 (1045,1046) - ^
03:17:342 (1144) - kat buat ngikutin vokal ^
03:18:770 (1154,1155,1156,1157,1158) - kat? daritadi dddddd mulu sih, lagian drum di sini ngga terlalu berat imo ddkkk ftw
04:04:913 lebih enak dikasih d, disambung imo lebih enak daripada diputus di tengah", lagian di sana kan bisa didengerin permulaannya drum yah Done.
04:12:913 (1477) - geser ke 04:13:056 coba buat ngikutin vokalnya ^
04:17:484 (1505) - ^ 04:17:627 ^
04:43:484 (1664) - ganti ke d, karna vokalnya tiba" muncul, ngebedain dari 04:43:342 (1663) - , yang ngikutin instrumen juga ^
04:50:484 (1700) - ganti ke d, instrumennya tekresan berat di sana ^
05:11:484 (1835,1836,1837,1838) - coba ganti ke KK KD, nyamain musiknya + gitarnya. dan mirror dari 1833 1834 Ganti 05:11:913 (1841) ke don aja deh; kayaknya jauh lebih akurat sih.
idk ini serasa Semi-Oni, dan mendekati Muzukashii yang lebih disusahin dikit gegara ada streamnya.. menurut gw sih, gatau modder lain

Kalo ada yang ketinggalan ntar gw chat deh
Gl~

Makasih \o/

Will check the other mods soon.

-APXH wrote:

Very good usage of Hitsounds. \:D/

00:36:913 (1) - Make the part after the red point a little more curved Sure.
00:55:199 (1) - Suggestion: Why not trying moving the slider so that the red point is in the center of the first combo circle 00:54:056 (1)? Because I want to follow 00:54:484 (4)'s curve.
01:12:342 (1) - Why not something like this to make the slider look more pleasant?: The current slider fits with the vocal vibration, and it's pretty nice to look, at least for me..


01:17:913 (4) - Move to: x:168, y: 112 Why? I feel that the current position is good enough.
02:39:627 (2,3) - Move to: x: 312, y: 304 Again, why? It feels... weird.
03:26:484 (2,3) - Suddenly, half beat sliders with red-points It's always good to make a few variations!
03:35:199 (1) - I personally don't think that we need a finish here. Also Try moving the slider so that 03:34:484 (3) is at the end of the slider and 03:34:770 (4) is in the center of the red point of this slider I think it'll be needed to emphasize that heavy instrument. Also, I feel that moving the slider isn't necessary. It won't really improve anything, IMO.

Can't wait to see this get approve~

Kin wrote:

Hi~
M4M here

[Affection]

03:06:342 (4) - I think if you move this one more to the top, it'll make the flow 4 and 1 better. The flow will looks more like a loop. but it will increase the jump between 4 and 1. Eh idk, not too sure about doing this due to the increased jump spacing you mentioned. I'll consider, though.

loop

03:29:770 (2,4) - I think it's better to unstack them, since they have the same color and only 3/2. Also it will make it more readable.Just think of this as a pattern variation. I feel that it's easily readable and fits wth the song.
03:46:342 (3,4) - just my opinion, but I think it flow better if you ctrl+g, if you fix this, don't forget the hitsound The current pattern fits better since the jumps get larger by every object.

A really nice diff, I love the flow !

[Drums of feelings]

00:11:342 (62,63) - I prefer to swap it, I mean change as k d. the k will follow the melody which is here 00:11:342 - Done!
00:13:056 (72,73,74) - almost same as earlier, k d k. high pitched melody are here 00:13:056 - 00:13:342 - ; Also I think it sound pretty good with the pattern. ^
00:18:913 (109) - change as k ? ^
00:22:484 (131) - I'll prefer to delete it. I think it'll make this one 00:22:627 - sound better with the guitare ^
00:25:770 (149) - just my personnal opinion, but I like how it sound if you change it as k ^
00:27:199 (156,157) - you used big note for the strong melody, why not for this two ? Also if you want this one 00:27:484 - different from this one Only made 00:27:484 (156) into a big don; the other one is still pretty weak IMO.
00:27:770 - ; change it as big K 00:27:484 (157) - Done.
00:40:913 (231) - change as k for the strong melody ? ^
00:43:342 (243) - here the melody have the same sound as here 00:43:199 (242) - ; So change this one 00:43:342 (243) - as k ? ^
00:45:056 (253,254,255) - I don't know why, but dkd sound good for me. Let's try ddk.
00:56:342 (322) - how about change it as k ? for the melody Done.
00:57:913 (331,332) - change both a big D ? The instruments aren't strong enough IMO.
01:04:413 - how about add one green line with x0,75 as SV ? I fit pretty well with the music
If you do this ^ ; it better if you add green line here 01:10:770 - (x0,81) ; 01:10:913 - (x0,87) ; 01:11:056 - (x0,93) ; Also, if you do this, I think it's better to delete this note 01:10:484 (400) -

want the 3 last green line (0,81 ; 0,87 ; 0,93) but lazy to do it ?

70770,-123.456790123457,4,1,0,70,0,0
70913,-114.942528735632,4,1,0,70,0,0
71056,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0

Huh, seems like an interesting idea, but... I don't really like it for some reason. I dunno why, but uh, I'll think of this again.
01:15:770 (436) - change it as big D ? big K will be kinda strange to play after a ddddk Done.
01:20:342 (463) - change as big D for the cymbal sound ? ^
01:50:342 (641) - change it as k ? ^
01:51:056 (645,647) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ? ^
01:52:342 - I don't know if they removed this rule, but I'm pretty sure flash kiai is forbidden on taiko diff Removed.
02:10:056 (755,756) - change both as big D ? previous note also have finish for the melody, so why not this 2 notes ? Just the latter I suppose.
02:37:627 (908,909) - your previous pattern is following the melody, so, change this 02:37:627 (908) - as k ? Done.
If you fix this ^ ; this one 02:37:770 (909) - sound kinda weird to me ; delete it ? I believe this one follows the song's rhythm pretty nicely, so why should it be gone?
02:39:913 (921) - change this one as k for the melody ? Done.
02:40:770 (926) - how about change it as big K ? and this 02:41:056 (927) - as k ^
02:47:270 - how about add a green line x0,75 SV ?
If you fix this ^ ; it's better to add green line like previous one

like previous one

173627,-123.456790123457,4,1,0,70,0,0
173770,-114.942528735632,4,1,0,70,0,0
173913,-107.52688172043,4,1,0,70,0,0
174056,-100,4,1,0,70,0,0

And also, if you add'd this SV change, I think it's better to delete this note 02:53:342 (996) - Not for now; same reason as the previous suggestion.
03:19:056 (1154) - change it as k ? Sure.
03:23:770 (1183) - change it as big D for cymbal sound ? ^
03:36:199 (1257,1259) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ? ^
03:37:484 - same as earlier for flash ^
04:10:770 (1459,1461) - add finish to both ? Agan, I feel that the instruments aren't strong enough to support them.
04:47:056 (1679,1681) - change both as big K to emphasize the strong melody ? Done.
05:09:627 (1820) - the high pitched guitare sound is here, change it as k ? ^

For this diff, I'll say it's a Muzukashii+ or soft Oni, but I think it's a Oni 7★
I'm pretty sure it's your 1st, or one of your 1st taiko diff. Some thing can be improved, but it's not a bad one, it's actually a nice relaxing one. Not really my first, but yeah, it's still pretty close; probably my fourth Oni and eight (overall) Taiko diff or something.

Good luck ! hope to see this ranked soon ! \o

Thanks guys! \o/

mod by Fortune cookie

..... kayanya kagak ada deh

mending post ini aja lah first try

kasih star aja ya. muach :*

Let me give you some advice.

Affection
1. OD9 is too high. Change it into OD8.
2. Avoid using large-DS streams, such as 01:15:199 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) and 01:33:627 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1). There are many of them, you should replace them with smaller-DS streams.
3. 00:45:770 (3) - I think you should use New Combo here. 00:45:484 (1,2,3,4) is a back-and-forth jump whose DS changes, and you should use New Combo to give the player a hint.
02:45:484 (4) - NC
02:45:770 (6) - NC
04:54:913 (3) - NC
I think you should use These NCs because there are similar back-and-forth jumps like 00:45:484 (1,2,3,4). You should give the player some hints.

Hi from m4m

d
k
D(big d)
K(big k)

Drums of Feelings

OD5.5→5(be better)

Song Setup→Design→Epilepsy warning & letter box (uncheck)

00:02:627 (10) - change d
00:03:770 (16) - change k
00:18:551 - add d
00:18:627 (109) - not Finish
00:21:770 (127) - change k
00:35:770 (202) - change d
01:39:627 (578) - change k
02:17:342 (787) - change k
02:42:342 (936) - change k
02:48:770 (974) - change k
03:45:199 (1309) - not Finish
03:55:770 (1368) - ^
04:49:994 - add d
04:50:056 (1701) - change k
04:50:342 (1703) - change d
04:50:484 (1704) - change k
04:50:562 - add d
04:51:556 - add d
04:52:280 - add d
05:05:556 - add d
05:05:853 - add d
05:06:134 - add k
05:06:277 - add d
05:06:416 - add k
05:06:562 - add d
05:06:627 (1820) - not Finish

Good luck

@Fort: Makasih star-nya masbro m(___)m

zhengyuanhang wrote:

Let me give you some advice.

Affection
1. OD9 is too high. Change it into OD8. Yeah, you're right on this. It's pretty ridiculous.
2. Avoid using large-DS streams, such as 01:15:199 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) and 01:33:627 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1). There are many of them, you should replace them with smaller-DS streams. I feel that these streams fit the song and are also still nice enough of a challenge without going overboard.
3. 00:45:770 (3) - I think you should use New Combo here. 00:45:484 (1,2,3,4) is a back-and-forth jump whose DS changes, and you should use New Combo to give the player a hint.
02:45:484 (4) - NC
02:45:770 (6) - NC
04:54:913 (3) - NC
I think you should use These NCs because there are similar back-and-forth jumps like 00:45:484 (1,2,3,4). You should give the player some hints. Hmm idk, but I feel that these are not needed. I've asked a few people to play this and no one complained about the back-and-forth jumps. I'll consider, though, since it might be correct.

Charlotte wrote:

Hi from m4m

d
k
D(big d)
K(big k)

Drums of Feelings

OD5.5→5(be better)

Song Setup→Design→Epilepsy warning & letter box (uncheck)

00:02:627 (10) - change d Oh yep. Sure.
00:03:770 (16) - change k The instrument here is quite similar to 00:03:913, so no.
00:18:551 - add d Just realized that I can do this lol. Sure.
00:18:627 (109) - not Finish I think it's okay to place a big note 1/4 beats after another note as long as if there wasn't a stream before the note. I'll keep this as is for now.
00:21:770 (127) - change k Done.
00:35:770 (202) - change d The pitch of the instrument here is higher than 00:35:627, thus the usage of kat.
01:39:627 (578) - change k Done.
02:17:342 (787) - change k ^
02:42:342 (936) - change k It's already k...
02:48:770 (974) - change k Done.
03:45:199 (1309) - not Finish The instrument here is pretty heavy, IMO.
03:55:770 (1368) - ^ ^
04:49:994 - add d Done.
04:50:056 (1701) - change k ^
04:50:342 (1703) - change d ^
04:50:484 (1704) - change k ^
04:50:562 - add d ^
04:51:556 - add d ^
04:52:280 - add d ^
05:05:556 - add d I can't see why should I add a note here...
05:05:853 - add d Added.
05:06:134 - add k Nope; same reason as 05:05:556.
05:06:277 - add d Added too.
05:06:416 - add k Again, no; same reason as the previously rejected suggestion.
05:06:562 - add d Done.
05:06:627 (1820) - not Finish Nope. I believe it should be fine for now.

Good luck

Thank you everyone! \o/

Hey I played this song on my love live app!

[Affection]

i got rekt

1. 00:11:627 (5,6) - overmapped, kinda feels out of place here. turn the playback speed to 25% and i don't hear anything
2. 00:12:770 (1) - you can put a random circle near the slider and use its approach circle to help blanket http://puu.sh/a91di/ea7a18a7df.png
3. 00:14:770 (4) - i'd redo the order of notes to have a keypress on 00:14:913 instead of a weak slider end http://puu.sh/a91qS/254e0cbc04.png
4. 00:34:913 (2,4) - overlap heads to be neater
5. 01:01:342 (3) - also want a slider head or circle here on the long white tick at 01:01:484 because the beat is stronger there (also vocals are there)
6. 01:10:342 (2,3) - improve blanket here
7. 01:17:913 (4,5) - overlap completely
8. 01:29:484 (1,5,6) - make them same distance apart to be a little neater
9. 01:34:484 (2) - move to the left (so its head is closer to end of previous slider) for better flow
10. 01:45:984 (3) - there is no percussion on this tick but i can hear something on 01:46:270 so you could have a triple there instead
11. 02:33:484 (1,2) - blanket is a little far at the edges
12. 02:53:627 (2,1) - improve this one too
13. 02:58:627 (1,2,3) - if they're gonna use the 1/6 beat snap divisor in a mostly 1/4 song, let's use a repeating slider to avoid confusing the player about the exact rhythm
14. 03:00:913 (1) - curve down for better flow
15. 03:46:627 (1) - i'd also rearrange this object for better flow
16. 03:48:913 (1,2,3) - same thing i said earlier about 1/6
17. 03:49:770 - don't want to use the 1/8 repeating slider for fun?
18. 04:10:842 (2,3) - maybe i been playin too much wcx maps, because usually when he does this the circles at the end of the slider are in the same direction as the slider
19. 04:22:056 (1,3) - blanket is a little far in the middle
20. 05:13:484 (1) - ctrl-g for better flow
21. 05:15:056 (3,1) - spacing is still kind of far

that's it from me, good luck!