1. Death Dance (6.98 stars, 419 notes)
2. Easy (1.14 stars, 55 notes)
3. Extra (5.98 stars, 279 notes)
4. Hard (2.97 stars, 210 notes)
5. Insane (3.45 stars, 279 notes)
6. Lunatic (4.94 stars, 262 notes)
7. Normal (1.91 stars, 152 notes)
8. Split Insane (4.21 stars, 500 notes)

[CSGA]Ar3sgice wrote:

00:16:427 (4) - 这个是不是应该在250:194的 本来想放那里的但柑橘ds太小了就放在现在这里
00:42:406 (2) - 这个没叠好 fixed

这次的rrt能fc不 肯定可以

jesus1412 wrote:

Sorry I'm late~ that's ok~

[Death Dance]

OD9!!! nooooooo lol, bpm138 is low enough, od8 is enough as well imo, thou it's ar10 now, od9's still too high imo ;w;

00:00:015 (1,1,2,1,1,2) - The anti spacing at the start works if you know the map, I'd recommend changing this around to make it a little more readable for the first pattern. Maybe use more sliders or making the spacing more coherent so that the player can get a good understanding of the rhythm. By making this first set of anti-spaced jumps more easily read you will make these 00:01:754 (1,1,2,1,1,2,1) readable without many changes, although I would advise that you find a way to make it a little clearly to the player how the timing here works, a good way to do this is stack some of the anti jumps (eg: stack these 00:02:188 (2,1) ) but the map more understandable after the first few plays. i know what u r meaning here but i have to say that these patterns r made as reading patterns with the logic: 1/2 gap with 1/4 ds, and 1/4 gap with 1/2 ds. thou it's may be regarded as no reason patterns but i think this is just a kind of it, and i can promise that if someone try to pass this diff, he can read this pattern after 1pc or even in a sudden, while i've req lots of players testing it and these patterns works very well.
00:26:318 (1,2) - This looks like a 1/8 spaced double and can throw players pretty harshly, space it out more please, it'd help a lot. good job, i even didn't notice this. after considering a bit i decide to stack 00:26:318 (1) - at the head of 00:26:536 (1) - , maybe now i need tests further more.
00:26:428 (2,1) - I would recommend turning the 1/8 slider into a double and adding to the start of the slider (making a triple). This map has quite a lot of overlapping so it's hard enough as it is, it'd be easier if the player didn't have to differentiate between ambiguous 1/4s and 1/8s. nope for here's no overmapping, u can listen to the song carefully and all beats following the violin track here, this rhythm is fine in mapping and with the mod above, the whole pattern can be ok now imo
00:33:275 (1,2,1) - ^ same as last 2 points. same as above
00:50:667 (1,2,3,4) - I personally think that this stream just breaks tempo in the map and it feel like something you're just forcing the player to remember, it's not an issue as such but I think it'd be nicer to use some form of slider here. yeah but, ok i can agree ur opinion, thou i won't change this even MF mentioned this, "after three 1/4 streams there's a 1/6 stream exsist, remember it's not 1/4 as before" maybe like a pattern as well w.
00:51:971 (5,6,1) - Space these out so that they aren't touching at least, right now they look like they're the same speed as the stream mentioned above and it can make the section confusing. 00:51:971 (5,6) - , 00:52:732 (1,2,3) - , 00:53:602 (1,2,3) - and 00:54:472 (1,2,3) - r just same part for following same violin beats in the original song's track, so regard them as a series of same patterns in a spacial part can be good to players, which is exactly what i wanna do here.
00:52:732 (1,2,3,1,2) - ^ ^
00:53:602 (1,2,3,1,2) - ^ ^
00:54:472 (1,2,3) - ^ Especially here before these harsh jumps, I think it'd be best to actually change the last 2 notes here into a 1/4 slider to make transition into the jumps nicer. ^
01:08:710 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - I would like to see these jumps moved to somewhere closer to the end of 01:08:493 (4) . At the moment, they're not only hard but they're also quite odd to flow into because of this, perhaps move the entire pattern right? u've already got big jumps within 01:07:841 (1,2,3,4) - , and the jump at 01:08:493 (4,1) - or even 01:08:710 (1,2) - is following that jumping flow or become the continuing of that, that's why i set that pattern at the place of the current one. actually it can be read much more better than closed ones, if ar10 and big jumps didn't block ur way to do that.
01:10:341 (2,1) - I think this would be a clearer 1/2 if these were stacked, otherwise I personally feel like it'd be good to move them apart more. hahaha right, remember the beginning of this diff? that's similar to it indeed www
01:13:819 (2,1) - Space these more, strange to read, at this point in the map where the jumps are so hard and adrenaline is high from the other insane jumps it's kinda hard to read properly so anti jumps are probably not the best suited, but that's just me. as above and yeah i know it's really hard to read, but that's the pattern itself imo.

It's hard to say how well the jumps actually play because they're so hard for me but I do feel like a lot of them are actually really well complimented. I think the only jump I could possibly complain about is 00:22:623 (2,1,2,1) , the pattern felt awkward to me but I do honestly think it's just me so I didn't mention it in the bulk of the mod. well maybe yep, that jump can be fine imo 0.0

[extra]

To do? lol maybe~

S A V E R Y wrote:

Can I make hard diff?

sry but i wanna complete this mapset all by myself ;w;

CptSqBany wrote:

You should consider lowering the HP a little bit in Extra diff, because You make 1x100 at the start and you cant recover the hp.

Whatever you will do in the map, you cant recover the hp after doing few 100s, even at FC. after lots of testing plays i can say there're no issue like you stated here... you won't fail at the beginning part if you only make 1x100 or even missed a note, and if you drop few 100s before failing, i think you are not ready to play this map.

Musty wrote:

i actually managed to fail multiple times holding a 100+ combo because i had like 10x100 in a row, consider doing HP-1 or something like that would be good imo i insist my version with the same explain above.

also

00:05:558 (1,2,3,4) - what about doing that instead? http://puu.sh/llLTU/ca994e7ca2.jpg actually your idea is good, thou just in common level. i just set those notes following the guitar track... and for the note 2 is following the main violin beat i think the current version of rhythm should be the perfect one. if you think ds between 1 and 2 is too large, i can say it's not that large for you've already hit all those high ds 1/4 jumps before with guitar track only, the jump here won't be too annoying, violin sounds appear after that, so it may plays nature if you try more times.
because there is actually no sound on (2) :p i think this plays better

1. 00:06:101 (5) - 可以摆成一条直线00:05:666 (2,3,5) -
   或者把00:05:666 (2,3,5) - 角度摆成和00:05:558 (1,2,7) - 一样
   
   
2. 00:07:732 (4,5) - 包好?
   
   
   
3. 00:09:145 (3,4,5) - - 按3这个滑条的顺序来说 转度有点大吧
   
   
   
4. 00:15:449 (6) - ctrl+j
   
   
   
5. 00:16:427 (4) - 这个位置感觉有点怪 尝试直线?
   
   
   
6. 00:23:275 (5,6,1) - 角度
   
   
   
7. 00:23:928 (3,4) - 有点难看
   
   
   
8. 00:28:058 (2,3,4,5,6) - 这里在EDIT很好看 AUTO里看HAO蠢

1. 00:08:710 (1) - ctrl+j 然后位置往下拉
   
   
2. 00:50:812 (5) - 这里应该是黄白线
   
   
3. 00:55:014 (2,1,2,3,4,1) - 人生的大起大落 应该就是指这个吧
   
   
4. 00:43:711 (2) - 减音量或者换个音效
   
   
5. 01:01:754 (1) - ctrl+G
   
   
6. 01:01:971 (2) - ctrl+G
   
   
7. 01:02:188 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - 这种212121的太反人类了 不过我喜欢

1. 00:36:754 (2) - 降低音量或者换个音效
   
   
2. 00:53:601 (1,2,3) - 这里最好是做的和00:52:732 (1,2,3) - 00:54:471 (1,2,3) - 一样 有一点角度
   
   
3. 00:55:449 (2,3) - 换位
   
   
4. 01:09:362 (3,4,1) - 这个角度和前面的落差太大
   
   
5. 01:16:427 (2) - 这个点我个人觉得放在下面的做等角比较好

1. 01:09:145 (1) - 这里变间距的话感觉可以NC
   
   
2. 01:22:188 (5) - NC