This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
626 posts
Offline
Due to the growing population of osu! players, maybe it's time to show the hundred best players of every beatmap.
Last edited by Hi_Hello on , edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,989 posts
Offline
mmm.. not bad idea. lets see what the rest say
User avatar
Global Moderator
9,234 posts
Offline
there was top 400 which that got removed. personally i think top 50 is fine
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,006 posts
Offline
100 would be more fine then.
~Star
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,457 posts
Offline
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
User avatar
osu! Alumni
2,645 posts
Offline
if you cant get in to the top 50, then focus on improving your play rather than focusing on getting high ranks so that top 50s come naturally
User avatar
osu!dev
8,437 posts
Offline
I agree. It is very difficult to get in the top 50 on standard ranking list. You need at least a 2 Mod FC to get in the top 50 on the average map that's not unreasonably hard to play with two mods. If peppy is interested in creating a more newbie friendly environment, then it would be a good thing to consider this idea as it will make newbie players feel more important when they get a good rank, and will make them feel like the road to making it to a top list spot is more achievable.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,105 posts
Offline
buny wrote:
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod

I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,989 posts
Offline
Myke B wrote:
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.

em, money?
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,457 posts
Offline
Trash Boat wrote:
Myke B wrote:
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.

em, money?

i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved

honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
715 posts
Offline
I totally agree. *star*

(Most of the time i land around #80 :cry: )
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,621 posts
Offline
Won't people then just keep asking for more and more scores to be displayed if this is implemented?
User avatar
Combo Commander
457 posts
Offline
I'm pretty sure peppy allows only 50 cuz most people have slow computers and increasing the rank feed for every single song you have downloaded would kill most of the computers ._.
User avatar
Global Moderator
9,234 posts
Offline
Myke B wrote:
plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :p
buny wrote:
honestly though, people don't even check the top 50
i don't know about everyone, but i barely ever look past the top 8 on the global scoreboard. quite close to just denying this request to be honest :(
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
3,457 posts
Offline
deadbeat wrote:
Myke B wrote:
plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :p

there's no point of it being in the global rankings for everybody to see if you can't watch the replay though
Reply 47 posts jump | 1, 2, 3, 4  next

Users browsing this forum: None


Jump to: