1. Advanced (2,65 stars, 482 notes)
2. Diplomatic Immunity (5,14 stars, 872 notes)
3. Hard (3,57 stars, 583 notes)
4. Insane (4,44 stars, 778 notes)
5. Normal (1,8 stars, 305 notes)

osu! needs more 07th Expansion

1. Diplomatic Immunity ~ me - done
2. Insane ~ me - done
3. Hard ~ me - done
4. Advanced ~ me - done
5. Normal ~ me - done

1. My sanity

Thank You Box
/ / / Mod posts

1. pishifat
2. Xgor
3. KSHR
4. LordRaika
5. Z3nx
6. Kaguya Hourain
7. Krfawy
8. Nozhomi
9. Yauxo
10. ErunamoJAZZ
11. Squirrel
12. ArcherLove
13. ExUsagi
14. Breezy
15. Sieg
16. Serena-
17. _S u w a k o_
18. -[Koinuri]
19. Sieg
20. TestApple - Pitch checks
21. iJinjin - Pitch checks
22. ExUsagi
23. Harbyter
24. Roxas
25. torappu
26. S a k u r a
27. 10.04.2015 22:30 - Rip mania
28. Krfawy
29. Kyubey
30. 23.04.2015 22:10 - 100 favs woah
31. 08.05.2015 23:10 - 150 favs :D
32. 05.06.2015 8:00 - 200 favs :D
33. 08.09.2015 13:00 - 300 favs :D

Artist: iojjj
Romanized Artist: iojjj
Title: 悪意と愛のすきまのパズル　
Romanized Title: Akui to Ai no Sukima no Puzzle

Sprite,Background,TopLeft,"background.jpg",0,0

M,0,82245,82285,531,114

 MX,0,82245,82285,531
 MY,0,82245,82285,114

Z3nx wrote:

Mod from queue thing wtv

[LR's MX]

00:04:383 (4383|4,4983|6,6183|3,6783|6) - I personally feel that these are staccato notes, according to the instrument in the music itself, thus i recommend to change them both to 1/4s in length to follow the music and give the staccato feeling on these LNs
Other similar notes here : 00:07:983 (7983|4,8583|6,9783|3,10383|6,11583|3,12183|5,13383|3,13983|6,15183|3,15783|5,16983|4,17583|6) -
yea you get the point, if you fix this, fix the other notes

yep, plannng to seperate them, thus i make it 1/1 , 1/2 and 1/4 length...
1/1 , 1/4 and 1/4 is fine too but sry, i feel the 2nd one fits 1/2 better

00:26:646 (26646|4,26646|6) - I think it's best to separate the staccato notes from each other by putting them in different hands during play, it makes it easier to play and it brings out the staccato playstyle here better ( if you get what i'm saying )

No worry , i completely get what u mean ^^' , rearranged their pattern.

00:27:277 (27277|1,27943|3,28610|5) - Not going to LN these anymore? ( and the following similar notes )

Nope, due to bpm change, this LN length is different , might caused some bad acc or smthg.

01:29:555 - Probably can hammer something here for the cymbal impact

I like to... but cant see how i can have this chance while im using the stream chord XD might be good to hammer in other place thou ^^
since im really planning to do so, since this is mx

01:33:605 - Seems like you have missed a note or 2 here for the drum rhythm

Yep, the usual drum kick sound, added....

01:51:455 (111455|5,111455|1,111605|4,111605|0,111755|5,111755|1) - Not sure about this, it feels inconsistent to the patterns that is similar ( 00:57:755 (57755|0,57905|0,58055|0) - ) I suggest you to hammer all three of these 2 note chords here for consistency
^ This applies to all similar notes also

Haha its ^^b that u point it out, but i intentionally make it like that, feels inconsistent but i do it intentionally... its to give more pressure to the player to think hard before hammering, while the other hand is not going to hammer... this really increase MX difficulty even the notes amount is low and looks easy

01:59:855 (119855|5,119855|4,119930|1,119930|2,120005|5,120005|4,120080|2,120080|1) - Really like how this alternating hand trill here is mapped to the drums, however it falls short as you changed the pattern to a 1/4 stair which has a totally different feeling ( 02:03:530 (123530|3,123605|4,123680|5,123755|6) - ) I would suggest to keep consistent with the alternating hand trill there, some other chord combos with that might work also
02:07:130 (127130|3,127205|2,127280|1,127355|0) - ^ and similar notes
02:08:855 (128855|4,128855|2,129005|2,129155|4,129155|3) - seems like you missed a 1/4 here or something
02:10:655 (130655|1,130805|1,130955|2) - ^ and 02:12:455 (132455|2,132605|2,132755|3) -
Well idk, i really like the 1/4 trill

Ugh, got it ... XD
but i cna only manage to make 2 part of this , trill
the rest, is why i dont trill it because i add some LN there ^^, yeah U MIGHT TRILL THE LN XD so noo....

02:04:205 (124205|4) - Seems like you are mapping for the highpitched instrument here, i suggest to make this 1/2 long to fit it

Right, i forgot that this actually is not hard XD so made it into 1/2 LN

02:12:455 (132455|2,132605|2,132755|3,139955|1,140855|2,140855|0) - I don't really like this chord here with the LN, if you hit the chord too hard your finger will lift off the LN key there, which tends to happen to me hehe, well it will be great if you can move 02:20:855 (140855|2) - somewhere else

HEHE, it was intentional XD *feels really MX now* , Sure, gotta try to move those jacky while LN thingy as much as possible everytime i notice it XD

02:23:405 - Seems like you missed a note here

Yeap, more notee , the better the MX feeling XD

03:06:455 (186455|0,186455|6) - Not sure if not hitsounding this is intended

yeah its missing XD i notice it too before..... fixed T^T

03:08:855 - Liking how the SVs here are handled

<3 bouncing and soft jiggling XD

03:25:955 - Might want to add a note here considering how the chord note amounts increase like these 03:24:155 (204155|0,204155|6,205055|6,205055|0,205055|1) -

Nice notice....

00:36:832 - Definitely need to add twice or even quad the green lines here, the increment of SVs here still feel jerky and unnatural

added two, but it looks smooth to me in scroll speed 10-13 ^^


[HD]

00:03:783 (3783|2,5583|1,7383|0) - Really think you can use 1/1 LNs here to map to the instruments
yeaaa not going to point out every single note here, you get the point

Yup ^^

00:52:655 - Don't really get the structure of the section here, Continued v

For this section, same reason for MX , wnt to make it a bit unpredictable here ^^
actually the notes amount on what i mapped is consistent , maybe i jst want to change style so player doesnt bored that they can guess my incoming pattern, since they cant, there they will have a challange, and i think its not really hard , cant see why they will feel uncomfortable.

01:33:605 - Same error as MX here in my perspective, it feels like you missed a drum beat here according to the rhythm

Yea XD added, since i make this using MX as reference

01:43:655 (103655|2,103655|4,103955|3,103955|1,103955|5) - Feels like you can 1/2 hammer something here for more impact

rearranged ^^

02:03:455 (123455|0,123605|1) - Might want to hammer this with consistency to the previous hammers ( 02:01:655 (121655|1,121655|4,121805|1,121805|4) - AND 01:59:855 (119855|1,119855|5,120005|1,120005|5) - )
02:05:255 (125255|0,125555|1) - do the same hammer as ^
02:07:655 (127655|5,127805|5) - Don't think you should hammer this for consistency
02:10:655 (130655|4) - add 1/2 Hammer this instead
02:12:455 (132455|1) - ^

Thanks for the mention, but yeah, same reason as the previous bold reply of mine ^^/
making it a bit unpredictable and pull out some reading skill of the player.

03:11:855 (191855|6,191855|3,191855|0,192155|6,192155|3,192155|0) - AND 03:13:655 (193655|6,193655|3,193655|0,193955|6,193955|3,193955|0) - Personally i like how these 2 drums are emphasized, but if you can extend/extrapolate this sequence here to the patterns here 03:10:055 (190055|6,190055|2,190355|1,190355|5) - , it will feel more consistent imo | Basically, 3 note chord hammer this fully 03:10:055 (190055|6,190055|2,190355|1,190355|5) - for consistency
03:17:255 (197255|0,197255|4,197555|1,197555|5) - ^

YEP YEP, got it, rearranged them, this part is double layer melody, u can said, the one is piano and the other is more string guitarish...
the guitar is hammer, while piano is a skipping stairs stream... ( in notechart )

03:20:855 (200855|0,200855|6,200855|3,201155|1,201155|5) - ^

but this one odesnt have the same pitch
03:35:555 (215555|0,217355|6,218255|3) - Shorten by 1/2, it feels like the background thingy sound ends 1/1 earlier

Sure, this also make HD easier.... XD ( a bit )

[NM]
00:03:783 (3783|2,5583|1) - Same suggestion as HD, extend to 1/1 and all the similar notes so as to follow the instrument thingy, don't think this pattern is too hard for NM anyways
00:29:277 (29277|0,31504|1) - ^ these stuff also apply

reasonable ^^ but now i have full LN on MX, half LN on HD, so i will make it no LN for NM, my mapping style on the spread thou ^^

00:52:655 - eeeeh i don't really know how you are structuring the hammers here
00:59:255 (59255|3,61655|3,63755|3,64655|3) - You barely used any center keys here, you might want to save them up and use them for the bells to make the center key more special | Eg. use them on 00:59:855 - 01:03:455 - 01:05:255 -

Same reason BUT on the 2nd thought, i will make the NM more easier and predictable and easier to be read ^^
also, nice catch for the bell... guhehehe XD

01:31:955 (91955|4,92555|3,93155|2,93755|4,94055|2,94355|4,94955|2) - Feels like there is alot of missing notes here

Yeah ^^ intentionally, i mean look at those LN amount on NM XD its already make NM player confused imo ^^

02:02:255 (122255|0,122555|2) - might want to hammer for consistency with 02:00:455 (120455|6,120755|6) - and the previous patterns
02:04:055 (124055|6,124355|5) - ^
02:05:855 (125855|6,126155|4) - ^
02:07:655 - Create a 1/1 hammer on the left hand here
02:09:005 - Add a note here for note rhythm consistency with stuff like these 02:00:005 (120005|3,121805|3) -
02:09:455 - Create a 1/1 hammer somewhere
02:10:805 - Add a note here for note rhythm consistency

Wait wait, i didnt really read all of those, but since MX and HD mod,
i rearranged this part ^^/ no worry... at least its more consistent for NM now , and yea predictable

02:52:205 (172205|2,172205|0,172355|1) - Yeaa, try to avoid brackets, it's weird
03:05:555 (185555|2,186455|4) - Not sure if missing hitsounds

Fixed, and yeah XD thts stupd klutz clumsy of me ever missed hitsound XD ahaha

03:39:155 - Feels rather empty, might want to add something here

i think no its okay XD let me take a break for a few scd with this inverse....

03:42:755 - lol not sure about inverses in NM, it feels abit overkill

okay XD i jst hope its easy, but looks like its not.... so i will nerfed it....

Main problem is just consistency for me i guess

Okoratu-chan, please, look here. :3

1. 00:30:004 (1) - That slider is not as beautiful as it could be. *me runs* I mean it can easily blanket with the previous slider and the shape can emphasize the shape of the previous one. Now it's too off to show it, but I believe making something like *that* would comfort this moment aesthetically. Instead of giving the points in the slider I'm writing the code of the slider below because I am afraid I will make another mistake while writing. (*)
   

   361,78,30004,6,0,P|435:103|459:119,1,90,2|2,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:40:055 (4) - Can you put the ending of the slider a bit higher? It would just flow a bit better. You know, just a little liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle bit up. For example I put it like (X=288 | Y=128).
3. 00:55:355 (8) - Personally I think you can re-arrange the 2nd segment of this slider (after the red point) to make it a bit more roundy, for example like that: *that*?

   302,320,55355,2,0,B|331:289|328:248|320:227|320:227|313:210|313:210|331:182|321:148,1,180,8|8,0:1|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   But if you don't want to change it, just blanket it with 00:56:255 (1) - by changing the position of two last points in this slider because now it just looks ugly. If you don't know what I'm talking at the very moment about: *CLICK!*
4. 01:04:355 (2) - Just blanket it, the straight slider would look better if the direction of the slider was different, but I know there's not much space for it. Another way to improve the design and the flow at the moment (and I think this is the best option #TrueStory) is to copy 01:05:255 (3) - this slider, scale it to x0.5 and rotate it -90* and put at the 01:04:355 (2) - XY position. Very simple and good-looking IMO.
5. 01:10:655 (1) - The idea is very good but I think flattening this slider a bit is better than making it that... 'deep', 'round'? IDK how to word it, but there's an *example* how I imagine it.
6. 01:51:155 (1) - Probably you will get angry that I suggest it, but try to not kill me. So I suggest to make this moment easier by removing that circle and extending 01:50:255 (4) - this slider til the circle's timing position. I am aware you try to follow the rhythm perfectly, but since it's the easiest difficulty and that normal is quite fast because of the BPM, try to make moments like that easier by using sliders as much as you can. You know sliders are easier than circles, but this diff still can be a bit easier. I don't mean you should nerf every note in this diff, but just similar moments like:
   
   1. 02:55:955 (1) -
   2. 03:26:855 (1) - Well, that is just a liiiitle bit too fast for this diff I guess. Consider using x1.5 instead of x2.0 in the timing setup. Now I am totally sure this will be too sudden for newer players, they will be just shocked! Also, I really advice to not end sliders at the red line when there's another note at the white one, it's really hard here to handle it.
   3. 02:55:955 (1) - ^ As above except the red line thing ^
7. 02:38:855 (2) - This moment scares me because of the flow and I don't think newer players will do it as correctly as they could since this moment requires more reading skills than a usual construction used in Normals. I strongly recommend an easier pattern like *this*.
8. 04:02:255 (5) - Just wondering if a whistle would emphasize the echoes of the music.

1. 00:47:255 (1) - Please, use this version of the slider:

   326,366,47255,2,0,B|389:316|354:272|417:223,1,172.5

2. 00:49:055 (1) - Just blanket it with the head of the previous slider, please. Now it looks a bit unappetizing.
3. 01:18:755 (3) - 'Abusing' DS to stack it with 01:17:555 (4) - head isn't a big deal and I think it will make this moment look better than with that overlap IMO.
4. 01:33:155 (1) - OK, this time I'm not sure if you want a slider like *this*, but I think the shape can be improved. If you like my version:

   188,328,93155,2,0,B|220:276|205:217|205:217|190:158|223:106,1,230,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

5. 01:39:455 (3,4,1) - I advice to stack them to the overlaps because now they seem off and it doesn't look aesthetic at all.
6. 02:05:555 (1,4) - ^ The same thing as above ^
7. 02:30:455 (4,3) - ^ The same thing as above ^
8. 02:55:955 (1) - Here I just think it'd sound nice with a whistle too because it could stress the vocal.
9. 03:41:855 (1) - Oko-chan, your sliders make me a bit confused to be honest because they seem to be not as neat as they could be... Can this one be something like *that*? If yes:

   286,283,221855,6,0,B|315:198|258:197|288:114,1,172.5,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

1. 00:42:755 (3) - Can you blanket this with the previous note, please? Now it doesn't look so cute. It doesn't really affect at the game but does increase the mapset's beauty level.
2. 00:47:255 (1) - If possible, please, move the red point in this slider to (X=368 | Y=120), the 4th point to (X=320 | Y=152) and the last point to (X=315 | Y=202)? Pretty sure it will improv the design of the slider even if the rest of the combo needs to be re-arranged.
3. 01:00:755 (4) - I highly recommend to use something like *this* because using an accurate pattern doesn't really work properly and I think some variation is required here. If you like this:

   379,8,60755,2,0,B|398:50|387:83|370:109|344:123|344:123|356:149|325:176|325:176|293:203|305:231,1,250,8|8,0:1|0:0,0:0:0:0:

4. 02:55:955 (1) - As in the previous diff, I suggest to use a whistle too since it would stress the very vocal.
5. 04:10:105 (1) - I am just wondering if it's 100% rankable. Have you asked Irreversible about it? If I well remember he's very good at giving opinions about woob-woob-wubbling sliders.

1. 01:10:655 (1) - I think the pattern here is very good, but I can play it better and SS it sooo much more often when it's CTRL + G'd instead of an accurate pattern. Just a suggestion.
2. 01:19:055 (4) - Why is this slider so perfect-made here when in the previous diffs every of this kind is... not as perfect? ;w;
3. 03:26:855 (1) - The same thing as in Hard diff, but I am just not sure if this wubble is too big or not. As I said - I wish you asked a QAT about it. Just remember to show him every note like this in the mapset.

Krfawy wrote:

J.Lo Oko-chan! Krfawy's coming to this town! \o3o/

Okoratu-chan, please, look here. :3

So before I start the modding session I just want to say my suggestions are mostly visual ones. They do not change the playground, they just can improve the design of your beatmap. Since the rest is pretty decent let me scold the design of your mapset, please. I won't bite. ;3

Normal

1. 00:30:004 (1) - That slider is not as beautiful as it could be. *me runs* I mean it can easily blanket with the previous slider and the shape can emphasize the shape of the previous one. Now it's too off to show it, but I believe making something like *that* would comfort this moment aesthetically. Instead of giving the points in the slider I'm writing the code of the slider below because I am afraid I will make another mistake while writing. (*) ✔ oh it was supposed to blanket there yes
   

   361,78,30004,6,0,P|435:103|459:119,1,90,2|2,0:3|0:3,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:40:055 (4) - Can you put the ending of the slider a bit higher? It would just flow a bit better. You know, just a little liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle bit up. For example I put it like (X=288 | Y=128). ✔ didn't take example points but i guess i get what you mean and did something
3. 00:55:355 (8) - Personally I think you can re-arrange the 2nd segment of this slider (after the red point) to make it a bit more roundy, for example like that: *that*?

   302,320,55355,2,0,B|331:289|328:248|320:227|320:227|313:210|313:210|331:182|321:148,1,180,8|8,0:1|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   But if you don't want to change it, just blanket it with 00:56:255 (1) - by changing the position of two last points in this slider because now it just looks ugly. If you don't know what I'm talking at the very moment about: *CLICK!* ✐ didn't do first thign because i like waveee ~o~ but did 2nd thingy
4. 01:04:355 (2) - Just blanket it, the straight slider would look better if the direction of the slider was different, but I know there's not much space for it. Another way to improve the design and the flow at the moment (and I think this is the best option #TrueStory) is to copy 01:05:255 (3) - this slider, scale it to x0.5 and rotate it -90* and put at the 01:04:355 (2) - XY position. Very simple and good-looking IMO. ✘ i might not be that straight myself but currently i prefer the straight slider
5. 01:10:655 (1) - The idea is very good but I think flattening this slider a bit is better than making it that... 'deep', 'round'? IDK how to word it, but there's an *example* how I imagine it. ✔ i made it better also it's not like this was my idea the current pattern is last resort because i don't know how to change directions how i wanted without making it look like utter bullshit otherwise
6. 01:51:155 (1) - Probably you will get angry that I suggest it, but try to not kill me. So I suggest to make this moment easier by removing that circle and extending 01:50:255 (4) - this slider til the circle's timing position. I am aware you try to follow the rhythm perfectly, but since it's the easiest difficulty and that normal is quite fast because of the BPM, try to make moments like that easier by using sliders as much as you can. You know sliders are easier than circles, but this diff still can be a bit easier. I don't mean you should nerf every note in this diff, but just similar moments like ✘ It's not that i don't understand your reasoning, it's just that that sounds plain wrong to me and i would like more opinions on these cases in particular before making my mind up what rhythm to follow for these.:
   
   1. 02:55:955 (1) -
   2. 03:26:855 (1) - Well, that is just a liiiitle bit too fast for this diff I guess. Consider using x1.5 instead of x2.0 in the timing setup. Now I am totally sure this will be too sudden for newer players, they will be just shocked! Also, I really advice to not end sliders at the red line when there's another note at the white one, it's really hard here to handle it. ✘ The time you linked has a 1.4x sv multiplier because that's the amount of SV the wiggle slider needs to be just as fast as a regular slider and thus just as easy to follow. if you were talking about 04:10:105 (1) - then i'll just say that 100bpm and 2.0x sv equals 200bpm and 1.0x sv so i put that there to actually be less confusing.
   3. 02:55:955 (1) - ^ As above except the red line thing ^
7. 02:38:855 (2) - This moment scares me because of the flow and I don't think newer players will do it as correctly as they could since this moment requires more reading skills than a usual construction used in Normals. I strongly recommend an easier pattern like *this*. ✘ so uhhmmm they can do it in the beginning and out of kiai like 00:46:355 (2,3,4) - but cannot do the same thing in kiai, that confuses me now .-.
8. 04:02:255 (5) - Just wondering if a whistle would emphasize the echoes of the music. ➥ there are whistles, and i don't want to put an artificial 3/8 delay echo on that whistle in order to empathise that sound because that would be ABUSING hitsounds o.o

Advanced

1. 00:47:255 (1) - Please, use this version of the slider:

   326,366,47255,2,0,B|389:316|354:272|417:223,1,172.5

   ✐ did a thing but not the thing you wanted lmao
2. 00:49:055 (1) - Just blanket it with the head of the previous slider, please. Now it looks a bit unappetizing. ✐ Blanket impossible, abort mission, do not eat sliders. ok jokes aside i did something withi s not blanketing but made the slider look like this
3. 01:18:755 (3) - 'Abusing' DS to stack it with 01:17:555 (4) - head isn't a big deal and I think it will make this moment look better than with that overlap IMO. ✘ I'm not really abusing DS I'm just prohibiting the game to autostack it in a way that would break DS by enforcing it with a custom stack
   
4. 01:33:155 (1) - OK, this time I'm not sure if you want a slider like *this*, but I think the shape can be improved. If you like my version:

   188,328,93155,2,0,B|220:276|205:217|205:217|190:158|223:106,1,230,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   ✘ I so want the shape to be like this i spent 25 minutes drawing this one slider so D:
5. 01:39:455 (3,4,1) - I advice to stack them to the overlaps because now they seem off and it doesn't look aesthetic at all. ✘ I know what you're talking about but this is also one pattern which took quite the time because 01:38:255 (4,3) - is intentional and i can't break the DS in this diff so moving 01:40:205 (4,1) - the way they are is the closest i could do ✔ did a thing because i agree about this one just because it's about a sliderend
6. 02:05:555 (1,4) - ^ The same thing as above ^ ✘ ignoreStAcKs
7. 02:30:455 (4,3) - ^ The same thing as above ^ ✘ i do these intentionally but i might think again about this one because i found that stacking them obviously on sliderends looks neat
8. 02:55:955 (1) - Here I just think it'd sound nice with a whistle too because it could stress the vocal. ✘ i
   never
   ever
   used
   whistles
   for vocals
   in all my hitsounding in this map
   they always go for background music
9. 03:41:855 (1) - Oko-chan, your sliders make me a bit confused to be honest because they seem to be not as neat as they could be... Can this one be something like *that*? If yes:

   286,283,221855,6,0,B|315:198|258:197|288:114,1,172.5,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   ✔ i did a thing quite similar to your thing but not exactly your thing also how to not break colorhaxing

Hard
Before I start - I see overlaps of the circles in this diff as in previous one, but here it works really well. I like that so much. :3

1. 00:42:755 (3) - Can you blanket this with the previous note, please? Now it doesn't look so cute. It doesn't really affect at the game but does increase the mapset's beauty level. ✔ oh no a blanket i barely cared about how... tragic
2. 00:47:255 (1) - If possible, please, move the red point in this slider to (X=368 | Y=120), the 4th point to (X=320 | Y=152) and the last point to (X=315 | Y=202)? Pretty sure it will improv the design of the slider even if the rest of the combo needs to be re-arranged. ✘ did it, looked at it, didn't like, undid
3. 01:00:755 (4) - I highly recommend to use something like *this* because using an accurate pattern doesn't really work properly and I think some variation is required here. If you like this:

   379,8,60755,2,0,B|398:50|387:83|370:109|344:123|344:123|356:149|325:176|325:176|293:203|305:231,1,250,8|8,0:1|0:0,0:0:0:0:

   ✘ i usually like variation but i also like this slider welppppppp
4. 02:55:955 (1) - As in the previous diff, I suggest to use a whistle too since it would stress the very vocal. ✘ +-kl;askjer;lkansdfm,zxcjuyh
5. 04:10:105 (1) - I am just wondering if it's 100% rankable. Have you asked Irreversible about it? If I well remember he's very good at giving opinions about woob-woob-wubbling sliders.

Insane
I am not sure if the gap between Insane and Hard isn't a bit too big, but I'd advice to ask some BATs about it because I don't want to make an unnecessary row. ✐ i did something

1. 01:10:655 (1) - I think the pattern here is very good, but I can play it better and SS it sooo much more often when it's CTRL + G'd instead of an accurate pattern. Just a suggestion.
2. 01:19:055 (4) - Why is this slider so perfect-made here when in the previous diffs every of this kind is... not as perfect? ;w; ✘ you want me to make it imperfect? xD
3. 03:26:855 (1) - The same thing as in Hard diff, but I am just not sure if this wubble is too big or not. As I said - I wish you asked a QAT about it. Just remember to show him every note like this in the mapset. ✘ ^ \:D/

Diplomatic Immunity
Even if I can see some sliders which could look a bit different, I don't think they really need to be changed since they do not scare me like the previous ones did.

Good mapsetu Okoratu. Good luck and have it ranked soon! : D

LVU Krfawy (>o3o)>

Krfawy wrote:

[*]04:10:105 (1) - I am just wondering if it's 100% rankable. Have you asked Irreversible about it? If I well remember he's very good at giving opinions about woob-woob-wubbling sliders. LVU IRRE


LVU Krfawy (>o3o)>

Nozhomi wrote:

Okopro request even if I'm a noob modder. (STD only !)
This SB god !

- Diplomatic Immunity :

1. 00:33:987 (1) - It's 1/12 slider not 1/8. ✔ k

- Insane :

1. 00:33:987 (1) - Same as Immunity. ✔ k
2. 01:11:105 (2,4) - Buh blanket. ✔ k
3. 01:13:955 (6,1) - ^ ✔ k
4. 02:26:255 (1,2) - I dunno but 1/2 sliders are enough for this part. There is no stuff on music enough strong to use them imo. ✘ both sounds are held down and i wanted to have that feeling in 2 sliders overmapping sliderends was only option
5. 02:55:055 (3) - Improve blanket (anchor 117:217 / end : 177:263). ✔ uhm did something
6. 03:07:055 (1,2) - As the other diffs (1.50x imo). ✔ spaced further apart without destroying pattern
7. 03:18:155 (2,3,4) - Reduce DS here. There is a hug difference with similar part like 03:14:555 (2,3) - ✘ believe it or not this is a consistent ds increase with diplomatic immunity diff thing.

- Hard :

1. 00:11:283 (2) - Anchor point to 264:184 and end to 207:207 to perfect it. ✔ do you know how much fuckshit i went through to get this correctly goddamn holy
2. 00:22:983 (3,4) - pls this awful blanket :/ ✔ ha
3. 01:00:455 (3,4) - You can do one better right ? :3 ✘ nah fuck this blanket i really like the current slidershape
4. 01:40:355 (1,2) - Make them parallel. They're really close and I think flow will be a little better. ✔ k
5. 02:48:455 (6) - Up to 249:317 ^^ ✔ confirmed hitler lmao
6. 03:07:055 (1,2) - Same as Advanced (something like 1.60x). ✔ k
7. 03:24:155 (1,2,3) - Maybe invert them to keep a rhythm consistency with 03:25:955 (1,2,3) - ? ✘ variety also there are 2 poof hitsounds on 03:24:455 (2,3) - and just one on 03:25:955 (1,2) - but the music in this thing is so loud that i think circles fittt

- Advanced :

1. 00:07:983 (2,4) - Maybe place them on same y axe, to form a better triangle ? ✔ how do you notice these
2. 03:07:055 (1,2) - You should space them a little more like 1.50x because these beats are strong and like this they are really close and don't fit with music imo. ✘ there must not be any jumps in this diff it's for the newb hard players time distance equality at all timessss

- Normal :

1. 00:48:155 (5,1) - Did you think you could blanket them for a better look ? ✘ na i don't think i can it creates overlaps and destroys stuff i like
2. 01:04:355 (2) - You should curve it and blanket imo to improve flow and looks better. ✔ ok you win the slider is gay now be happy krfawy o.o
3. 01:39:455 (5) - Dunno but use a straight slider would make nicer patter and improve flow. ✘ may i keep the gay one D:
4. 02:00:755 (5) - Move to 501:152 lol I wonder how I saw this one was not exactly at center. ✔ what.
5. 03:33:755 (5) - I would move this one a little down (like 288:60) to get a nicer movement with 03:33:155 (4) - . ✔ rotated a bit and moved down

Toogud4me!
Happy Birthday Oko (06/01/15) o/
Mukyu~