forum

Nekomata Master feat. JESSY - The Smile of You [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
20
Topic Starter
karterfreak
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on July-06-14 at 1:51:26 AM

Artist: Nekomata Master feat. JESSY
Title: The Smile of You
Source: Elebits
Tags: Raindrops Eledees Credits IIDX 14 GOLD Kai to Zero no Fushigi na Tabi Pop'n Music 17 THE MOVIE Margaret Lucy
BPM: 136
Filesize: 7936kb
Play Time: 05:07
Difficulties Available:
  1. Tasha & TKS's Oni (4.2 stars, 1349 notes)
Download: Nekomata Master feat. JESSY - The Smile of You
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Going for approval seeing as the rule for approval got changed!
I did odd numbered sections in bookmarks, TKSalt did even numbered.
Please redownload if you downloaded before 04/06/2014 ~8:00PM EST.
Dolphin
first!!!!!

Tasha + TKSalt Taiko Collab

Unicode Artist name is incorrect, you need to remove those brackets: http://puu.sh/97QHi/d8a90e2049.png

I also suggest renaming the difficulty to "Tasha + TKS Taiko Collab", since TKSalt changed his username to TKS.

According to RemyWiki, the artist name is 猫叉Master feat.JESSY, you should at the very least add "JESSY" to the tags.
The lyrics are written by Margaret Lucy, so you could add her to the tags too.

Whilst I'm already mentioning all these pointless things, this song appeared in beatmania IIDX 14 GOLD, and in Pop'n Music 17 THE MOVIE, consider either changing the source or, at the very least, add these to the tags.

Source: http://vjarmy.com/wiki/index.php/The_Smile_of_You

01:18:845 (24) - Change this to a kat, since you start following the high-pitch synthesized sounds.

02:57:227 (235) - er, this finisher seems pretty random to me unless you're trying to emphasize the hi-hat release..? I'd say make this a normal kat, since emphasizing a hi-hat release doesn't really make much sense.

03:53:257 (169,170,171,172) - Since you're emphasizing the kats with finishers, you might as well do these as well!

04:26:786 (8) - Make this a kat to emphasize the cymbal crash

I didn't find much except for the metadata issues, nice map tho, its fun to play :) (and the song is cute too)
TKS

Dolphin wrote:

first!!!!!

Tasha + TKSalt Taiko Collab

02:57:227 (235) - er, this finisher seems pretty random to me unless you're trying to emphasize the hi-hat release..? I'd say make this a normal kat, since emphasizing a hi-hat release doesn't really make much sense. - yes i have followed the relatively strong hi-hat sound. this will fit the flow of until KIAI.

03:53:257 (169,170,171,172) - Since you're emphasizing the kats with finishers, you might as well do these as well! - youre pretty right but i dont prefer the herd of finisher ;_;

I didn't find much except for the metadata issues, nice map tho, its fun to play :) (and the song is cute too)
thanks for your helpful suggestions! also about the diff name, i will leave it to Tasha! :roll:
Topic Starter
karterfreak

Dolphin wrote:

first!!!!!

Tasha + TKSalt Taiko Collab

*snipped source stuff* Source information is updated to vjarmy information. (Hadn't gotten around to changing it yet)

01:18:845 (24) - Change this to a kat, since you start following the high-pitch synthesized sounds. This doesn't work very well for me as I dislike how it both sounds and plays due to it affecting how 01:19:568 (29,30) - is interpreted. Tried to change this to compensate but in the end I still liked how I originally had it.

04:26:786 (8) - Make this a kat to emphasize the cymbal crash Done, as well as deleting the note before it so I could make it an actual finisher.

I didn't find much except for the metadata issues, nice map tho, its fun to play :) (and the song is cute too) Thanks for the mod
mintong89
Hello M4M

[TT's Taiko]

00:09:863 (42) - According to the previous pattern, the 00:08:539 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - pattern is suddenly change to fit other isnt is really weird imo (the previous pattern is d k d k ddk d k something like this.) but if you put k at (42) I think it's acceptable.
00:22:216 (64,65,66,67) - Imo should be k d k d, because you do the same thing at previous pattern (red line is blue and white line is red). But I hear really loud 00:22:436 (65) - guitar sound at here so I think k k d k is fine too.
00:30:819 (14,15,16,17,18) - d k d k k, just in my option.
01:19:568 (29,30) - Actually if you hear really carefully you can hear this part have 1/6 too, or I think you can put k d if you want.
01:52:216 (78,79) - The hit-hat 1/6 sound is so clear but why you didn't put 1/6 pattern?
02:13:613 (25) - I know the sound pitch isn't high than 02:10:083 (9) - this but it still high than 02:13:392 (24) - this...so I think you may put as k.
02:27:951 (92,93,94,95) - kkdd? the sound is more fit than kddk because the music is kinda fade down the pitch at this part.
02:45:598 (183,184,185) - I hear nothing want to put this 1/4 so I suggest to delete it or put as ddk.
03:28:613 (76,77,78,79) - I think the sound is more fit as d d k k.
03:39:863 (116,117) - Again, the hit-hat 1/6 sound is really clear.
03:53:980 (172,173) - ^

Overall: The maps is quite fun, nothing can be mentioned.
Good Luck!
Topic Starter
karterfreak

mintong89 wrote:

Hello M4M

[TT's Taiko]

00:09:863 (42) - According to the previous pattern, the 00:08:539 (35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42) - pattern is suddenly change to fit other isnt is really weird imo (the previous pattern is d k d k ddk d k something like this.) but if you put k at (42) I think it's acceptable The pattern change is to emphasize the piano in this section. This is consistent with me continuing to highlight specific piano parts through this entire bookmark.
00:22:216 (64,65,66,67) - Imo should be k d k d, because you do the same thing at previous pattern (red line is blue and white line is red). But I hear really loud 00:22:436 (65) - guitar sound at here so I think k k d k is fine too. Tried with both given recommendations, but I have an issue with them as I want to highlight 00:22:436 (65), and making 64 a kat in any way doesn't allow for the same highlighting I want to give it.
01:19:568 (29,30) - Actually if you hear really carefully you can hear this part have 1/6 too, or I think you can put k d if you want. I was intentionally not mapping this 1/6 as it is fading out
02:13:613 (25) - I know the sound pitch isn't high than 02:10:083 (9) - this but it still high than 02:13:392 (24) - this...so I think you may put as k. This is relative to pitch for all 4 of the notes leading to the 1/6 hits here. If it was a higher pitch than the previous, I used a kat, if it was lower, I used a don. I highly prefer this section like that.

Overall: The maps is quite fun, nothing can be mentioned.
Good Luck! Thank you!
TKSalt's parts for him to mod
00:30:819 (14,15,16,17,18) - d k d k k, just in my option.
01:52:216 (78,79) - The hit-hat 1/6 sound is so clear but why you didn't put 1/6 pattern?
02:27:951 (92,93,94,95) - kkdd? the sound is more fit than kddk because the music is kinda fade down the pitch at this part.
02:45:598 (183,184,185) - I hear nothing want to put this 1/4 so I suggest to delete it or put as ddk.
03:28:613 (76,77,78,79) - I think the sound is more fit as d d k k.
03:39:863 (116,117) - Again, the hit-hat 1/6 sound is really clear.
03:53:980 (172,173) - ^
MMzz
Bubbled!

Everything looks good and plays well.

RIP DT SCORES OD7
Love
One quick suggestion, no kd.

02:08:980 - Add a k here, feels pretty empty with the section after having this note.
Topic Starter
karterfreak

Love wrote:

One quick suggestion, no kd.

02:08:980 - Add a k here, feels pretty empty with the section after having this note.
Applied
Love
Bubble #2
TKS
ohwait i just noticed that mint was modded this map x_x

mint wrote:

00:30:819 (14,15,16,17,18) - d k d k k, just in my option. - i prefer the current.
01:52:216 (78,79) - The hit-hat 1/6 sound is so clear but why you didn't put 1/6 pattern? - because i wanna keep 01:52:436 (79,80) - these finishers.
02:27:951 (92,93,94,95) - kkdd? the sound is more fit than kddk because the music is kinda fade down the pitch at this part. - current pattern is fine as a basic pitch.
02:45:598 (183,184,185) - I hear nothing want to put this 1/4 so I suggest to delete it or put as ddk. - i was ignored the snaredrum sound on this part.
03:28:613 (76,77,78,79) - I think the sound is more fit as d d k k. - no ;__; i really dont wanna use persistent kat sound.
03:39:863 (116,117) - Again, the hit-hat 1/6 sound is really clear. - same.
03:53:980 (172,173) - ^ - ^
i can do pop a bubble but actually no changed my part.
thanks for mod! *late*
Topic Starter
karterfreak
I coulda swore you said you weren't changing anything to me before TKS. I must be losing my mind.

Shouldn't be a need to pop bubble if you're not changing anything.
KanaRin
Good job! :)

Approved!
Nwolf
woo gratz : D
Irreversible
shouldn't it be TKS' instead of TKS's ?
Kuro

Irreversible wrote:

shouldn't it be TKS' instead of TKS's ?
Yup, TKS' is grammatically correct
Stefan
Other Diffs by TKS where called as "TK'S <difficulty>", so maybe keep this instead?

Anyways, congrats!
Topic Starter
karterfreak
I kept it as TKS's because TKS is his name on here, or in this case, considered a proper noun. My english grammar isn't that great but I just try to keep consistency in using 's instead of just ' when it comes to possessive proper nouns, regardless of an S at the end. I'm fairly sure that TKS's is just as correct as TKS' in this case.

Reference: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words ... possession
TKS
either way, i dont mind about the diff name ( ˘ω˘ )
Senritsu
Either way, it's approved already wwww
gratz! nice song and diff too obviously ♥ (๑・‿・๑)
Please sign in to reply.

New reply