1. Easy (2.71 stars, 79 notes)
2. Gu's Insane (5 stars, 324 notes)
3. Hard (4.87 stars, 190 notes)
4. IMPACT!! (5 stars, 341 notes)
5. Normal (4.14 stars, 124 notes)

1. 00:00:296 (1) - I'm not sure if the spinner is really useful. I think you should either map from 00:02:578 to 00:13:502 or remove the spinner and start at 00:13:502. (Since the song is really short i think you should map it)
2. 00:32:252 (2) - Move the end point two grid left for a better blanket.
3. 00:44:643 (2) - Move it to x=384 y=304. I think the overlapping is better this way.
4. 01:10:730 (2) - Move it 2-3 grid up for the same reason.

1. 00:28:991 (1,2,3) - Why not this:
   
   
2. 00:40:730 (1,2) - The note at the end is hard to read for rookie player.
3. 00:49:861 (3,4) - ^
4. 00:56:382 (1,2) - ^
5. 00:57:524 (2,5) - I think they should be at the same high.
6. 01:24:589 (5,6) - Guess.....

1. 00:21:654 - Add a note?
2. 00:57:850 (1,2,3,4) - Move them 1/2 beat earlier?
3. 01:22:959 (2,3) - Make them end at the same spot (like you often do in your map)

1. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - The notes aren't exactlt on the beggining and the end of the slider.
2. 00:32:904 (1,2,3) - ^ (So, it's done on purpose. Well, i find it very awkward)

1. 01:25:160 (1) - The spinner doesn't end at the same time as in the other diff. (in fact i even think it's not snapped)

1. 00:12:035 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 把这一段的sampleset改成drum怎么样 addition别改
2. 00:14:480 (1) - add combo
3. 00:28:339 - 这里空着不舒服, 建议http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/701435
4. 00:31:926 (3) - ball ball
5. 00:40:730 (1,2,3,4) - 用滑条多好, 然后note叠在slider开头的下面 233 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/701463
6. 00:56:382 (1) - 这里空着比较好 穿越那个长音
7. 00:59:154 (1) - 感觉是人
8. 01:24:915 (4) - 做个转圈slider怎么样ww

1. 01:21:165 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - 好难看hh 红色那里用短滑条梗是不是好玩点 http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702212

1. 00:19:045 (2) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702231
2. 00:37:469 (1,2,3) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/702236
3. 01:24:752 (6) - remove reverse

1. 我感觉你这间距改成circle 3正好
2. 00:42:361 (2) - 不好

1. 啪啪啪
2. 01:23:774 (2) - 吉安帕

1. 感觉Hard和Gu's Insane间的跨度有点大，后者难了些

1. 听说所有难度的Break必须一致？
2. 00:36:328 (3,4) - 总觉得不好看啊orz建议不重叠
3. 00:43:339 (1,2) - 个人不喜欢这种重叠，可以试试把第一个slider的末端圆圈刚好放到第二个slider上
4. 00:49:861 (3,4) - 太近
5. 00:53:774 (1,2) - 第二个slider往上放一点，仔细看，没有平
6. 01:00:948 (1) - 这个slider放在这感觉有点怪，如果从01:01:437开始感觉好一点
7. 01:09:426 (1,2) - 个人不喜欢这种重叠，可以试试把第一个slider的末端圆圈刚好放到第二个slider上
8. 01:21:165 (2) - 可以顺时针转一点，看起来和后面的slider处于一个圆弧上

1. 01:21:165 (2) - CircleSize要不要 + 1
2. 00:15:948 (1) - 这个弧度略猎奇
3. 00:21:165 (1) - 这个弧度略猎奇
4. 00:33:556 (4,1) - 别重叠
5. 01:00:132 (3,5) - 别重叠
6. 01:04:209 (1,3) - 建议把3的结尾和1的开头重叠

1. 00:07:632 (5,1) - 重叠好
2. 00:18:556 (1,2) - 柑橘这个地方不该跳啊
3. 00:32:252 (2,4) - 重叠好
4. 00:41:219 (2,4) - 没有重叠好
5. 00:41:709 (3,5) - 首先没重叠好，其次这样好像不能RANK？
6. 01:03:393 (6,1) - 没有重叠好
7. 01:04:209 (1,3) - 没有重叠好
8. 01:06:817 (1,4) - 没有重叠好
9. 01:22:959 (2,3) - 这个重叠有点蛋疼

1. 前面说了跨度有点大，建议AR - 1或2
2. 00:23:937 (2,1) - 这个距离是什么情况，弱逼没看懂
3. 00:42:198 (1,2) - 跳得有点大

1. 00:05:187 (4,1) - 不好看啊orz
2. 00:19:535 (3,4) - 不建议重叠
3. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - 貌似不能RANK？后面那个也是
4. 00:43:828 (2,4) - 没有重叠好
5. 01:23:774 (1,2) - 建议往下移到不重叠，或者完全重叠

1. 01:25:160 (1) - 和IMPACT一样加上那个whistle吗？

1. 00:15:948 (1) - 或许是想追求艺术感吧不过实在感觉像是普通的三点slider画歪了orz 可能我有必要提升一下艺术感
2. 00:25:730 (3) - 实在是加一个repeat会比较合曲吧……
3. 00:42:361 (2) - 对normal来说可能有点难
4. 00:57:524 (2,4) - ^
5. 01:25:078 (6) - ^
6. 01:25:160 (1) - 同Easy

1. 00:17:089 - 这段00:17:089 (3,4) - 00:18:556 (1,2) - 00:19:861 (4,5) - 之类这样的构造，有时跳有时按spacing来，也感觉不到有固定的跟的音轨，有点混乱，可以的话或许可以统一一下？
2. 00:34:372 (1,2,3) - 突然跟vocal有点奇怪，你后面也是跟的电吉他的话，感觉这换成跟电吉他会好点
3. 01:13:828 (5) - 这个whistle……感觉下错了，本来是想下那个kick的whistle吧？
4. 01:14:480 (1) - ^
5. 01:25:160 (1) - 同Easy

1. 诶为啥显示Not submitted？改标题了……？
2. 00:11:056 (3,4) - 反转？
3. 00:25:078 (1,2,3,4) - 因为离上一个超过了stack latency所以看起来比较诡异 建议右下移造成stack的样子或者调高latency
4. 00:36:002 (3) - 减速……？
5. 01:25:160 (1) - IMPACT!的这里是whistle而这个难度是clap，考虑换成一样的？

1. ……富有冲击力
2. 00:19:045 (2,3) - 感觉这两个都反转，00:19:861 (4,5) - 这两个在时间线上调换位置可能会比较好？
3. 00:21:654 (2) - whistle
4. 00:24:426 (6) - head-clap
5. 00:28:828 (1) - 将head-clap换成head-whistle
6. 00:43:094 - 最好在这和00:43:257加上clap不过按照你的排列手法后者应该是不太可能的 备考

Strawberry wrote:

make sure you have looked through the previous mods.I swear that I have. And most issues have been fixed. Sorry I haven't mention that.

No_gu
OD8 is more suitable imo.No. I think we should try to avoid this diff to be a "nothing but hard" one. Imo it's kinda meaningless.
01:23:774 (6) - look like the new combo should be on the next circle for a stack warning.Absolutely.

Normal
00:53:122 (2) - the whistle here sounds really needless. consider to remove it?I've changed the next note's hitsound (whistle->finish), so now the whistle here may be needed.

Easy
WHY STR2 in this diff? keeping rate 1 is totally enough for hitsounds of sliderticks and other things since i didn't find any other reason about that.Now it's 1.

NoeL-CIFER wrote:

general
好图！但是insane和impact难度与之前的难度感觉无法衔接，跨度太大impact完全对称闹那样= =
easy
感觉良好，没有问题
normal
个人倾向于把cs改到3
00:06:817(2,3,4)间距小一点
00:15:948 这个slider拆开来怎么样，两个折回感觉有点偷懒
00:21:165 同上
00:42:361这个有意遮掉一部分的么，感觉不是很好看
01:16:926这里感觉有点怪，去掉？
hard
00:57:850(1,2,3,4)说实话，打hard唯一断的地方就是这里，刚断的时候有点莫名，总是抢拍，改slider？
insane
敢不敢再难一点
ar-1
00:37:632这里一个三连和之前的二连感觉有些吃力，距离拉近一点怎么样
01:21:165这个串形状诡异。。
如果不看之前的难度，单独看这个insane的话，啪啪啪起来最舒服~~
impact
00:57:687(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)换成串行不行，这种超短的slider很不习惯。。

• 
  Why don't you map after the first spinner?

1. 00:21:165 (1) - Snapped wrongly.
2. 00:22:469 (3) - ^
3. 00:23:774 (1) - ^

1. 01:06:817 (1) - Should start at 01:06:654 to follow the song.

• 
  I recommend OD8 for this diff.

1. 00:14:480 (5) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing between (2,4,5) and (5,6).
2. 00:15:785 (6) - I think this note doesn't match the song because there's no sound in back here.
3. 00:31:600 (1,2,3) - I felt weird these placements when playing. Is it better to place (2) above the end of slider? They are a circle -> a circle -> a slider so what (2) is being below the end of slider looks weird.
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:32:904 (1,2,3) - Same reason as above, (2) should be below the end of slider or (1) should be above the start of it.
5. 00:35:513 (4) - Add a new combo to show the change of spacing.
6. 00:47:415 (5) - ^
7. 00:51:165 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I guess you followed the vocal here but I don't feel they match well. Should they start at 00:51:002?
   
8. 00:53:774 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Your pattern is very good and following the music. How about using wider spacings for them? The song is excited here, so I guess wider ones match very well.
9. 01:17:089 (8,1,2,3) - Also I felt they don't match the song.