forum

Nightwish - Songs Compilation

posted
Total Posts
60
show more
Fushimi Rio
那两句我想让他在整小节的时候切换下一句 就不改了
文件夹名改了
smallboat
Check mapset and storyboard are okay, so give it Bubbled

(Thanks Fushimi Rio check)
Sieg
hey there, recheck

there are bunch of files unused
sb\bg\bg\alpenglow.png
sb\bg\bg\edema ruh.png
sb\sb\#4 alpenglow\D.png
sb\sb\#8 the greatest show on earth\8.png

also there is delay in soft-hitfinish5.wav here's version without http://puu.sh/AlroI/00271e4e39.wav

call me to repair
Sieg
repaired
smallboat
Check okay, Qualified
pw384
gratz!!
Topic Starter
EncoreW

pw384 wrote:

gratz!!
Yumeno Himiko
goubi
Topic Starter
EncoreW

Yumeno Himiko wrote:

goubi
6
Fushimi Rio
狗币狗币币
Mirash
00:39:759 (1,1,1) - no feedback on those downbeat drums feels so cringe lol, could be nice if you drum sampleset them
02:16:879 (3) - missing whistle
02:22:236 (4) - you seem to be following guitar with drum sampleset here, so placing drum sampleset on 02:22:665 (5) - would be nice, right now it sounds empty
03:24:539 (1) - place at least drum sampleset on it
06:53:202 (2) - this should be a drum finish and not a soft whistle, just listen to that drum. also 06:53:405 (3) - 06:54:216 (1) - 06:54:824 (3) - and 06:54:013 (3) - could be drum clap for some rhythm variety. anyway look up this end of section i think it really needs stronger hitsounding feedback
11:06:830 (1,1) - 11:07:571 (1,1) - stacks are broken but thats whatever just pointing out

aside from section on 7 minute this is a good map
PandaHero
Hitsounds assurance team in action
Topic Starter
EncoreW

Mirash wrote:

00:39:759 (1,1,1) - no feedback on those downbeat drums feels so cringe lol, could be nice if you drum sampleset them
02:16:879 (3) - missing whistle
02:22:236 (4) - you seem to be following guitar with drum sampleset here, so placing drum sampleset on 02:22:665 (5) - would be nice, right now it sounds empty
03:24:539 (1) - place at least drum sampleset on it
06:53:202 (2) - this should be a drum finish and not a soft whistle, just listen to that drum. also 06:53:405 (3) - 06:54:216 (1) - 06:54:824 (3) - and 06:54:013 (3) - could be drum clap for some rhythm variety. anyway look up this end of section i think it really needs stronger hitsounding feedback
11:06:830 (1,1) - 11:07:571 (1,1) - stacks are broken but thats whatever just pointing out

aside from section on 7 minute this is a good map
why not post your mod before this mapset qualified...
Shovan
Just wanted to ask you if there was any reason behind 06:31:209 (2) - ? It seems to me to only be there to confuse players. Barely any notable sound and the similar vocal sections before (example 06:29:486 (1,2) - ) were always done with 2 circles and not 3...

Aside from that it's a rather nice map and thanks for sharing the Nightwish love OwO
xdbaka
It is so fun to play :3
Topic Starter
EncoreW

Shovan wrote:

Just wanted to ask you if there was any reason behind 06:31:209 (2) - ? It seems to me to only be there to confuse players. Barely any notable sound and the similar vocal sections before (example 06:29:486 (1,2) - ) were always done with 2 circles and not 3...

Aside from that it's a rather nice map and thanks for sharing the Nightwish love OwO
because of vocal
Shovan

EncoreW wrote:

because of vocal

That's what i meant with the comparison to other sections. There are clear vocals on the white and red tick of that section, just like for other vocals, but the blue tick is barely notable.

06:24:216 (1,2) - The word is "Listen". White Tick is "Lis", Blue Tick is a held "s" leading into the next syllable. Red tick is "-ten".
06:29:486 (1,2) - White Tick is the impact of the word "Did". The second half of the word (the second "d") is already on the blue tick. The red Tick is "We".
06:31:108 (1,2,3) - White Tick is the impact of the word "Just". The second half of the word (the held "s" that leads in to the next word "t") is already on the blue tick. The red Tick is "to"

Those three sections have the exact same vocal structure to me, but are mapped differently. It is fine to do it with 3 notes, but it is weird because it is done with 2 notes before.

So new question: What is different at 06:31:108 (1,2,3) - that made you put 3 circles? For me the vocals have the same structure.
Topic Starter
EncoreW

Shovan wrote:

EncoreW wrote:

because of vocal
That's what i meant with the comparison to other sections. There are clear vocals on the white and red tick of that section, just like for other vocals, but the blue tick is barely notable.

06:24:216 (1,2) - The word is "Listen". White Tick is "Lis", Blue Tick is a held "s" leading into the next syllable. Red tick is "-ten".
06:29:486 (1,2) - White Tick is the impact of the word "Did". The second half of the word (the second "d") is already on the blue tick. The red Tick is "We".
06:31:108 (1,2,3) - White Tick is the impact of the word "Just". The second half of the word (the held "s" that leads in to the next word "t") is already on the blue tick. The red Tick is "to"

Those three sections have the exact same vocal structure to me, but are mapped differently. It is fine to do it with 3 notes, but it is weird because it is done with 2 notes before.

So new question: What is different at 06:31:108 (1,2,3) - that made you put 3 circles? For me the vocals have the same structure.
06:31:108 (1) - ju 06:31:209 (2) - s 06:31:311 (3) - t to
pw384
Hey men mapping is a perceptual activity of human being so it's not a necessity to be picky on things related to such trivial consistency
Shovan

EncoreW wrote:

06:31:108 (1) - ju 06:31:209 (2) - s 06:31:311 (3) - t to


Yeah that is what I said as well. Stil doesnt really explain why it is done differently from the rest to me, but I guess this is the full reasoning then.

pw384 wrote:

Hey men mapping is a perceptual activity of human being so it's not a necessity to be picky on things related to such trivial consistency


If you think the existance of a hitobject is trivial then I guess we will never share the same opinion. That being said I'm fully aware that mapping has a lot to do with individual perception
of a song and all I did above was state my perception of the song.
pw384

Shovan wrote:

pw384 wrote:

Hey men mapping is a perceptual activity of human being so it's not a necessity to be picky on things related to such trivial consistency
If you think the existance of a hitobject is trivial then I guess we will never share the same opinion. That being said I'm fully aware that mapping has a lot to do with individual perception
of a song and all I did above was state my perception of the song.
Yeah so it is your perception. Anyway you can map your own if you are not quite satisfied with an existing version! :)
Please sign in to reply.

New reply