Hey lululu wrote:

M4M

Wait For Me
00:48:213 (7) - you put here that is very uncomfortable,move to x 338 y 26 Okay, moved it somewhere else though
00:51:013 (1) - I remember you can not use redline make SV change You can
01:01:013 (5) - NC and make a slow SV? I like it the way it is
01:15:513 (6,7) - there don't need a turning point Yes, vocals
01:46:213 (1) - move to x 310 y 291,make the follow like01:41:413 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - Okay
02:24:613 (10) - NC Ok
02:25:413 (1) - remove NC Yep
03:01:313 (8,1) - why this sample doesn't like 00:50:113 (8,9) - and 01:15:713 (8,9) - Cause its more intense and its the last stream before the climax
03:27:013 (1,1,1,1,1) - I think thhe distance should be smaller than smaller,because music is smaller than smaller too I think lower sv does the job pretty good already
03:53:413 (1,2,3) - wrong fit I think there is 1/8 Will see what others think :p
04:06:613 (1,2) - too far Reduced distance a bit
04:17:613 (1,2,3,4) - there should be smaller than smaller too I think it fits pretty well

GL

Yugu wrote:

m4m(Koiyuki and 1112's gd)
sry for toooooooooooooo late to mod your map

00:53:413 (1) - slider's head can stack on 00:51:813 (1) - this slider's end to look more clear But it isnt even noticeable while playing :<

02:48:613 (1,2,3) - why increase ds here , i think 02:48:413 (8,9,1) - 's ds is enough , 02:49:413 (4,5,6) - this part i think is ok but this part of music is not have obvious changes 02:48:613 (1,2,3) - Alright

03:59:013 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - this part of song weakened so this jump's ds is gradually smaller , 04:01:413 (5,6) - i think this ds is too big , in comparison . and the intensity of the song is not significantly enhanced imo Reduced spacing a bit

05:17:413 (1,2) - so far imo 05:16:413 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - Really easy to hit though :p

nice map

emm , just a short mod cuz i can t find out more

gl!

Yahuri wrote:

m4m return from my q

Waiting
-the slider-slide sounds kinda weird especially in the softer parts. primarily 00:26:213 - 00:39:013, and 05:10:413 - end. u can silence the sliderslides there Added a hitsound for that
00:43:413 (4,2) - could be spaced out a bit more, visual spacing looks a bit too close imo Okay
01:23:813 (1,2) - strong note here 01:24:013. why not map this pattern like 01:17:413 (1,2,3,4)? To have a variety of patterns there
01:27:013 (1,2) and 01:36:613 (1,2) - ^
01:39:813 (1,2) - isnt this DS kinda high? its even bigger than this 01:39:413 (8,9) but also 1/4 I dont think its tii high because the drums are really intense there
01:40:013 (2,4) - 02:07:013 (3,4,1) - fix stack Fixed
01:52:613 (1,2) - doesnt flow that well here imo cuz of zigzaggy flow. would be better if 2 was ctrl+g, but then ull have to deal with spacing to 3 I think it flows really well
02:04:613 (3,1) - putting the head of 1 under 3 makes it a bit harder to read than the others, especially cuz the body of 1 flows left at first which is totally concealed under 3 Will see what others think
02:54:613 (4,2,3,4) - stack screws up the aesthetics, remove overlap Okay
03:26:913 (4,1) - jump is too big in comparison to beforehand, there isnt appropriate buildup into this. make the mini stream-jumps gradually bigger or make this jump smaller. Made the jump smaller
04:04:613 (5,6,7) - remove overlap They dont overlap o.o
04:07:613 - why skip over this note? To emphasize the impact of the strong drums more~

good luck!

Gabe wrote:

will be back

Gabe wrote:

*There are missing claps on: 03:04:613 (1) - 03:05:013 (3) - 03:05:413 (1) - 03:05:813 (1) - Fixed
*Whistle should be on 03:55:013 - instead of 03:55:413 - considering the whistles on 03:57:413 (1,2,3,4,5) - True
*04:15:013 (1) - I'd suggest to follow what you were doing with the previous objects by placing this circle in a linear flow with the previous slider. You can place it at x:256 y:41 Okay
*05:12:613 (1) - I know it's a slower part, but it would be looking so much better if the spacing would be different from the previous objects. Move it just a little so there's a significant distinction from both parts. For an example, you could be moving this slider to x:337 y:67. Please apply the same of all the other similar objects or new combos, in most cases. Good Idea

call me back!!

Hobbes2 wrote:

i suppose i can heart this

03:25:413 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - feels like a bit of a diffspike because 1/4 jumps aren't really used a lot in this map, so especially the last bigger one i can imagine catching a player off guard.

Irreversible wrote:

dq to change preview point (as per req)