1. Akitoshi's Normal (1.86 stars, 90 notes)
2. Easy (1.58 stars, 68 notes)
3. HOS' Hard (3.21 stars, 142 notes)
4. Insane (4.35 stars, 193 notes)
5. Lasse's Expert (4.81 stars, 221 notes)

Difficulties
Easy - Log Off Now
Normal - Akitoshi
Hard - HootOwlStar
Insane - Log Off Now
Insane #2 - Antares-
Expert - Lasse

Special Thanks
Metadata Check - Kagetsu + Lasse

- Voli - MrSergio

Metadata
https://soundcloud.com/leagueoflegendsjapan/on-the-rift-pv-ver

Paski wrote:

Ok, that's one of my first mod, don't kill me.

NM here

[General]

1. What do you think about this wallpaper? https://orig00.deviantart.net/8015/f/20 ... 96pwmk.png Yasuo is always bad. (Remember to credit the artist)

maaaybe, idk lol

[Easy]

1. It could be OD2/HP2. Normal diff is OD4/HP4, so it should be okay? ok

[Insane]

1. 00:44:053 (1) - This pattern is not hard, but it's weird to tap. Strong sounds start at red tick, what about shortening the slider to 1/4 and putting another note on red tick? i see what you mean, but the sound that i was following also extends to the red tick so im not sure, if more people suggest this i'll change
2. 00:44:401 (3,4) - 3 rotated 20° counter-clockwise and put on x:392 y:224; 4 same rotation, put on x:216 y:160. It looks cool. nty, i like my current loop motion atm
3. 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - About this pattern. Triplet is weird to start, but again: not hard. You can shorten the slider and lower volum on sliderend, putting another note, or leave it in this way, it's good in both ways. same comment as 00:44:053 (1) -
4. About the star at 00:49:285 (1,2,3,4,5) :
   00:49:285 (1) - on x:22 y:277;
   00:49:459 (2) - on x:173 y:201;
   00:49:634 (3) - on x:93 y:351;
   00:49:808 (4) - on x:70 y:182;
   00:49:983 (5) - on x:187 y:305. o i didnt notice i made a star shape lol, fixed altho a bit differently, since i made it bigger
   It looks cooler.
5. 00:58:180 (1,2,3,4) - Rotate 15° counterclockwise? Against, small thing. nty i like my current shape

Lafayla wrote:

Mod for anything I can find in everything>
I already explained why in modhelp

EASY
00:38:471 (2,3,4) - looks awkward without nc I would just add 00:36:727 (1) - to previous combo

and ya
goodluck with mapset, its pretty gud

[[Pika]] wrote:

heyo you better return my mod lol.

Easy

1. 00:10:460 (1,2) - not in slider path triggered fix i think, it was pretty fine as it was lol
2. 00:19:460 (1) - 3/4 works better here to represent piano yes, i also mapped 00:22:085 (3) - with a circle
3. 00:51:727 (2,3) - not in slider path angery fix
4. 00:59:053 (4) - center pls lol ok

Insane

1. 00:05:585 (5) - peak is here but you choose to emphasize 00:05:773 (6) - instead yea
2. 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - no emphasis zzzzz yea
3. 00:09:710 (4,5,6) - resident sleeper yea
4. 00:11:022 (2) - should be like 00:03:522 (2,3) - in terms of rhythm no because in the first pattern the piano repeats the same note twice so i reflect that with the half beat slider, it doesn't happen second time around so i dont map it
5. 00:12:522 (2) - place at 165:200 instead b/c the sounds (2) and (3) represent are equal in intensity and pitch mm i disagree, their is definitely more emphasis on the last (3) here, theres an extra piano note added + the string background changes
6. 00:15:522 (5) - same thing about the rhythm 00:03:522 (2,3) - yes this time because theres another double piano note
7. 00:17:585 (5,6) - same thing about "wrong emphasis peak" ya
8. 00:22:460 (3) - just do normal wave slider lol no, that slight bump adds a little bit of visual emphasis on the soft piano that occurs on the slider tick
9. 00:28:355 - WHERE MY DOWNBEAT AT REEEEEE o lol i forgot to shorten the spinner and replace with a circle from months ago lol gg
10. 00:33:936 (1,2,3,4,5) - proper star pls i tried
11. 00:58:355 (3,4) - jumps pls no because they repeat the same note, altho i spaced 4 further away

rawr mod outbreak

1. 00:11:960 (1,2,3) - is there really need to be such a big spacing? i mean previously you made 00:09:897 (4,5) - such spacing for 1/2 gaps and there suddenly it went crazy but music doesn't do much here, its the same calm piano
2. 00:24:147 - how about spinner here?

1. 00:04:460 (1,2) - 00:16:460 (1,2) - i'm not sure if this is just me, but this spacing is really confusing, i couldn't get that this is a 1/2 gap
2. 00:26:960 - why not map 1/4 drum thing here? its pretty audible, spinner here doesn't seem fitting tbh

1. seems cool

1. 00:30:448 (6) - i think synth sound here is pretty important so i suggest making this thing 3/4 reverse (same for similar instances)

1. 00:51:727 (2) - this thing starting here seems unnatural, perhaps move it to red tick or even big white. i think 2/1 gaps would work pretty well to show contrast with kiai, lower object density and stuff

h4d0uk3n1 wrote:

Hi, nm from my queue

insane:

1. 00:04:460 (1,2) - 00:16:460 (1,2) - i'm not sure if this is just me, but this spacing is really confusing, i couldn't get that this is a 1/2 gap mmm, nobody has had trouble with this in testplays so i think its ok
2. 00:26:960 - why not map 1/4 drum thing here? its pretty audible, spinner here doesn't seem fitting tbh didn't want to overdo it, if more people suggest then i'll add one in

easy:

1. 00:51:727 (2) - this thing starting here seems unnatural, perhaps move it to red tick or even big white. i think 2/1 gaps would work pretty well to show contrast with kiai, lower object density and stuff idk how i feel about this, i understand your point but then its ambiguous as to what im following, if more people suggest i will consider further tho

Sorry for short mod, nothing much to say really, looks pretty solid. Good luck!

Fursum wrote:

hi m4m

how2mod 1 min map

[Easy]

00:05:960 - Note density is a bit high for a calm section, this could be mapped as a slider end to reduce it as it is barely snapped. I mean 00:05:210 (2) - this could be a reverse slider instead. Same for 00:17:960 - i ctrl + g'd the rhythm

00:29:576 (3) - 00:35:157 (3) - The wave sliders aren't symmetrical *triggered* so these could be the same side as they are the same sound. fix i think
00:46:320 (3) - the vertical ones look pretty ew fix

00:20:960 (2) - Slider body is 2 degrees off from the linear hitcircles reee2 d e g r e e s

00:22:460 (1) - Not sure if this broken wave is intentional but I guess you went for the violin thing in the background shrug ya its intentional


[Insane]

00:05:773 (6) - This could be the same ds because lower ds actually puts more pressure by trying to slow down, as the note is higher than the first ones but not much lower than the previous one. So I don't think it needs extra emphasis also makes the pattern tidier.
Same 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) - i remapped these instead since im terrible at making stuff like this

00:06:710 (2,3,4) - They look like they are meant to be linear but if they were I don't think the overlap works well flow wise, a stack would do better on the emphasis or atleast a lower overlap.
Same 00:09:710 (4,5,6) - did a smaller overlap

00:23:960 - Well as this is a higher diff I think this could be mapped as a reverse slider like the top diff to not map it passively. did this as a repeat since i don't want to make the soft piano clickable since i think the violin pedal note is more important here

The doubles connecting to sliders need a bit of work cause they are off by small margins but visible enough to bother me xd
00:29:314 (5,6) -
00:32:105 (5,6) -
00:34:896 (6,7) -
00:36:553 (5,6) -
00:47:716 (5,6) -
Mostly ds stuff but if you wanted to emphasize the sounds at the end of triples they don't need extra spacing or something cause they are already emphasized by ending a triple, emphasizing a small amount just makes them look off. fix all uglyness here

1. 00:05:210 (2,3) - reversing the rhythm here would be better, ending 3 on that chord thing seems weird (also something about downbeats etc etc)
2. 00:17:210 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:36:727 (1) - should really be angled like the rest, the curve doesnt give off that sharp feel that the sound here has - 00:50:680 (1) - and this are completely different sounds. a slightly sharper angle than the rest (but still rankable for easies ofc) could work here.
4. 00:47:890 (1) - ^

1. 00:08:397 (2) - 1/1 slider could work here to catch that piano on 00:08:772 - and so people dont think that 3 starts on that piano thing. you used a 1/2 gap at 00:11:960 (3,4) - so it shouldnt be a problem
2. 00:10:460 (1) - this stands out way too much compared to the other sliders in this section, curve out? imo the first part in general shouldnt contain really sharp anchors since it's calm instead of aggressive.

1. 00:01:460 (1) - minor suggestion but i think you should move this closer to the center so that new players will have an easier time seeing and reacting to this when it comes out
2. 00:16:460 (1) - way too aggressive looking for this calm section imo
3. 00:22:835 (2,1) - stack 1 on 2 for increased emphasis to the end of the calm section? you break ds in this section so i think this would still be readable
4. 00:44:401 (4,5) - bit nazi but i really feel that all the drumbeat things covered by this should have equal emphasis instead of mapping the second one passively

1. first of all stuff like 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - is kinda cool
2. 00:05:397 (4,5,6) // 00:05:022 (2,3) - these could be spaced out to differentiate them more noticeably from the much calmer 00:05:022 (2,3) -
3. 00:44:576 (4) - this ends on a really important drum

1. 00:20:210 (4) - this should probably be ctrlged since the same sort of stack into slider that starts on new chord thing was done that way on 00:05:585 (3,4,1) - too
2. 00:26:960 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - i feel like instead of starting with a stack and developing it into a constant spaced stream, you couldve gone all the way and gradually spaced the stream out every note
3. 00:51:901 (1) - these sliders would probably feel more emphasized if they werent directly part of the circle thing created by 00:50:680 (1,2,3) - etc

1. 00:19:460 (1,2) - Messed up with spacing here
2. 00:59:053 (4) - NC?

• 
  Looks good

1. 00:24:053 (1) - You should have a longer spinner recovery time because this is only a hard so it might be a bit difficult for players (According to Monstrata's BN guide it should be at least 1 beat)
2. 00:14:960 (1,2,3) - 00:02:960 (1,2,3) - Really minor, but the two patterns are emphasizing different notes. I like it better emphasizing 2
3. 00:46:843 (2,3,4) - The triple at the end looks a bit wonky, it's slightly curved and has slightly different spacings

1. 00:05:210 (3,4,5,6) - I think that 3 is just as important as 4, 5, and 6 here but the spacing really puts emphasis on 4 for no reason. also add a whistle on 3 if you accept this suggestion
2. 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually different from the previous part, you shouldn't map it the same way. Really only 5 and 6 should be emphasized because of the higher piano part, unlike in the first part when 3/4 notes were emphasized. Change up the spacing to make it fit better and remove the whistle on 4
3. 00:44:576 (4) - There's a loud snare on the end of this, the 1/4 slider rhythm really doesn't fit here
4. 00:32:715 (2,1) - 00:43:878 (2,1) - The emphasis with the spacing in these two similar parts is different

1. 00:45:012 (7,1) - Just wanted to point out that this is kinda unexpected and hard to read. Don't know if it's intentionally supposed to be like that
2. 00:50:157 (2,3) - 00:50:419 (4,5) - Kinda minor but the second part is two snares on both the circle and the sliderhead while the first is a kick then a snare. You could change the spacing or something

newton- wrote:

m4m

[easy]

1. 00:05:210 (2,3) - reversing the rhythm here would be better, ending 3 on that chord thing seems weird (also something about downbeats etc etc) lol ok i'll ctrl + g it back, i agree the clicking rhythm feels weird
2. 00:17:210 (2,3) - ^ ya
3. 00:36:727 (1) - should really be angled like the rest, the curve doesnt give off that sharp feel that the sound here has - 00:50:680 (1) - and this are completely different sounds. a slightly sharper angle than the rest (but still rankable for easies ofc) could work here. mm i disagree, this sound is significantly different to the rest of the other sounds in the kiai and also leads into a drum fill, i think changing the visuals of the slider here is a cool way to represent that
4. 00:47:890 (1) - ^ same

[insane]

1. first of all stuff like 00:46:843 (1,1,2,3) - is kinda cool thanks man :d
2. 00:05:397 (4,5,6) // 00:05:022 (2,3) - these could be spaced out to differentiate them more noticeably from the much calmer 00:05:022 (2,3) - i think they already are? i dont know what you mean here
3. 00:44:576 (4) - this ends on a really important drum these two kick sliders are in the stream because im focusing on the synth here more than the drums, if you listen closely theirs two distinct pitch changes on the slider heads of both of them which i wanted to get across through gameplay

solid set, sorry if the mod seemed too short to be of value or something

good luck!

_orange wrote:

hey

[Easy]

1. 00:19:460 (1,2) - Messed up with spacing here whoops LOL
2. 00:59:053 (4) - NC? no point in an nc here since nothing in gameplay would change since theres no spinner at the end

[Insane]

1. 00:05:210 (3,4,5,6) - I think that 3 is just as important as 4, 5, and 6 here but the spacing really puts emphasis on 4 for no reason. also add a whistle on 3 if you accept this suggestion mm i kinda agree, its more emphasised but i don't think its as important as 4,5,6. i've spaced it out a little more but i don't think its worthy of a whistle hitsound/different grouping because its still in the lower end of the piano compared to the other 3
2. 00:17:022 (2,3,4,5,6) - This is actually different from the previous part, you shouldn't map it the same way. Really only 5 and 6 should be emphasized because of the higher piano part, unlike in the first part when 3/4 notes were emphasized. Change up the spacing to make it fit better and remove the whistle on 4 again i see where you're coming from, but the notes are very very similar/the same in most cases of this pattern, and i think changing how it plays for such minor differences in the music could be a bit misleading gameplay wise. although if more people suggest it i will try something here
3. 00:44:576 (4) - There's a loud snare on the end of this, the 1/4 slider rhythm really doesn't fit here same comment as the mod above, both streams in this diff follow the synth which imo is more important
4. 00:32:715 (2,1) - 00:43:878 (2,1) - The emphasis with the spacing in these two similar parts is different ye thats the second one is leading into a stream and i didn't want to copy paste the previous patterning because the stream and build up is different

Solid map, hope I helped!

niyuji wrote:

hello
so here's my mod. m4m

Insane

00:14:960 (4,5) - blanket ya
00:15:897 (6,1) - check stack 00:14:772 (3) - ya
00:33:675 (6,7,8,1,3) - blanket
00:34:111 (2) - same ^ i cant fix this without visual spacing looking crap, and i honestly don't think they're that bad anyway
00:39:692 - you should map this sound mm i disagree, if i map that sound that takes away a lot of the emphasis that the next note has aswell as sits inconsistently with my current rhythm choices
00:44:053 (1,2) - spacing is different, take a look at 00:41:262 (1,1) - , 00:43:529 (1,2) - i would keep it consistent in kiai intentional because of the stream here, i use the same technique earlier with a triple coming off of a slider too
00:43:529 (1,2) - tail touches 00:44:750 (1) - i think you could space objects a little not visible in game, and i don't want to space the rest of the stream out too much or it might become too difficult
00:46:843 (1,1) - same ^^ this one is intentional by design

Easy

seemsgoodman

enjoyed while playing, very nice set
good luck

[XV] wrote:

[M4M]

Easy

1. 00:28:355 (1,2,3,4) - I personally would use this rhythm for the kiai It would feel a lot better for newer players. I can understand why 00:28:704 (2) - ends on a red tick, for pure simplification to make it a 1/1 gap with 00:29:576 (3) - . The issue it's that the heavy beats are ignored both here 00:29:053 - and here 00:29:401 . Making it really awkward imo.
   
   i get what you mean, and it could be change to a 1.5 beat gap here, but i wanted to encapsulate the whole synth patterning here instead of focus on the drums which is the main reasoning behind the rhythm of the entire kiai (i understand theres a major synth note on the first white tick, but the main synth doesn't end until the red tick (where it is promptly followed by a triple)) but, i also think that the slider anchors that light up with the tick here 00:29:053 - give off at least some emphasis on the drums aswell whilst sticking to my core rhythm and i kinda wanna keep that, the fact that the beat ends up being a 1/1 gap is a side effect here. i think if more people suggest then i will reconsider (and its an easy fix to do) but at the moment i like the current rhythm since its a different type of rhythm compared to most easy diffs out there whilst still being easy to read
2. The rest of the diff is fine.

Insane

1. Dude, c l e a n diff. Only nitpicks below.
2. 00:06:710 (2,3) - I personally would make these ones as spaced as 00:05:398 (4,5,6) - . Since you already used that low spacing for piano notes that are a lot less noticeable here 00:05:022 (2,3) - . In contrast, the piano notes here 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - are a lot more clear i added more spacing but its still not the same as 00:06:710 (2,3,4) - just because the first two notes in this triple are the same, but the last one is different and thats something i wanted to emphasise
   
3. Your whole map has beautifully crafted sliders, and then we have this 00:22:460 (3) - shit in the toilet shaped slider out of nowhere. Why. B R E H, the reason behind this slider design is so their is a clear visual emphasis on the soft piano playing in the background, altho if more people get triggered by this ill make it a normal boring wave ResidentSleeper (and does it rly look that badd )
   
4. HP 6 should work just as fine. yes

Lasse's Expert is good as it is. Unless you want to pick on structure, sv and spacing choices, but all of that is subjective and bound to the mapper's style due to being the top difficulty.

realy0_ wrote:

hello, m4m

General :
in all the difficulties, the first part for is a bit loud for me, reducing it to 25% fit more the calm part.

Easy :
00:22:460 (1) - accentuate the red anchor ? did a bit more
00:33:936 (1) - delete the whistle and add a finish its already a finish and i like the whistle
00:36:727 (1) - ^ this is already a fiish lol
00:45:099 (1) - delete the whistle same as first one
00:50:332 (4) - add a finish to have a less brutal hitsound transistion nothing in the music supports a finish hitsound here though, and i dont think it sounds that bad lol

Insane
00:22:460 (3) - accentuate the red anchor ? did a bit more
00:33:936 (1) - delete the whistle and add a finish same as easy
00:45:098 (1) - delete the whistle ya
00:58:704 (4,5) - move to x389 y181 no thanks since that messes up the visual spacing

Lasse's expert is great. Overall, this is great for ranked, couln't find small errors so i just added suggestions.

thanks for the mod!

1. 00:35:179 (1) - drum hs here?

1. 00:17:397 (4) - i think this should be part of this triple 00:17:022 (2,3) - so the jump is on the note with the highest pitch, this feels like ''whoops i didnt have space anymore so i just added it here'' xd
   
2. 00:39:692 - perhaps add a note? (stack it on 00:39:866 (1) - )

1. 00:05:585 (3) - you should probably separate this from 00:05:772 (4,1) - since the note stands out as the highest pitch
   
2. 00:38:471 (2) - rather personal, but imo following the angled part of this slider feels a bit forced visually? consider something like this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/B8O0ylnm.png
   
3. 00:39:866 (1) - felt rather underwhelming because usually this sound is two minisliders or two clickables

Voli wrote:

increase kiai volume to 70% on all diffs? Lasse already has it but 60% feels a tad low ok

Insane

1. 00:17:397 (4) - i think this should be part of this triple 00:17:022 (2,3) - so the jump is on the note with the highest pitch, this feels like ''whoops i didnt have space anymore so i just added it here'' xd damn i got exposed LOL (jk, fix, i also removed the whistle too cus of pitch n stuff)
   
2. 00:39:692 - perhaps add a note? (stack it on 00:39:866 (1) - ) mmm i see why but i left that one blank intentionally since neither the triples before nor the fast slider afterwards follow that synth so i left it blank and i think the pause here works kinda nice

ring ring

Voli wrote:

i

Lasse's Expert

1. 00:05:585 (3) - you should probably separate this from 00:05:772 (4,1) - since the note stands out as the highest pitch if I seperate it I get more movement onto the next object which doesnt fit well, this being spaced while others aren't is a nice differentiation imo
   
2. 00:38:471 (2) - rather personal, but imo following the angled part of this slider feels a bit forced visually? consider something like this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/B8O0ylnm.png yea I really prefer current gameplay wise and I think it's cute
   
3. 00:39:866 (1) - felt rather underwhelming because usually this sound is two minisliders or two clickables more clicks now

ring ring