LittleEndu wrote:

Things I found when playing:
00:04:488 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Very uncomfortable to play this linear pattern.
?
01:59:680 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Unsupported by music. Needs more clicking like in what follows.
mhm

Things I found when looking in editor:
00:10:064 (3), 00:12:757 (2) - These could flow better into the next slider. Feels too linear.
00:18:910 (3,4) - Appears same as 00:18:334 (1,2) but they have different timing.
snapping you mean
01:33:718 (3,4,5) - Linear pattern does a poor job emphasizing this. 01:41:410 (3,4,5) This pattern with expanding caps is better.
that's progression
01:56:603 (1) - I would ignore the singer and map the drums. Would make for a better transitioning to the next part.
i prefer not to
03:19:680 (1) - I assume this spinner is here so it would be full 5 minutes of drain time. Slow slider might be better.
sounds interesting
04:17:616 (1,2) - Very uncomfortable angle to follow.
why?

Overall I don't agree with a lot of the linear patterns that are in the map. But if you find a fix for 01:59:680 (1) it's all good.

hohol454 wrote:

NM from queue

Insane

General: wrong offset, move +10
rechecked, ant it seems fine for me as it is, i'll ask for more checks tho, thanks for mention
00:09:680 (2) - rotate by 1 or 2 to better align with 00:08:718 (7) -
alright
01:26:805 (11,12,13) - looks pretty bad, stable curve would be better than finishing the circle and having a weird edge on a blue tick
fair
01:36:997 (4,5,6) - why is distance from 5 to 6 bigger than from 4 to 5
just pattering, not a big deal
02:31:997 (1,2,3,7,8,9) - make distance between stacks the same as 02:32:382 (4,5,6,10,11,12) - )¨
supposed to be progression
04:01:171 (6,8) - blanket
04:02:911 (3) - ^
right
04:30:736 (4,5) - why is there no jump? every other similar pattern has it
for pattering\ guess the difference is not so big so I'll let this stay
04:30:870 (5) - not stacked
04:39:432 (5) - ^
oh
04:43:044 (11) - NC and put a note on 04:43:178 - . You're thinking of it as if it was 04:43:312 (1,2,3) - when you should think of it as 04:43:579 (2,3,4) - . The music pattern clearly starts on the downbeat and goes for 6.5 beats before it gets cut by 04:46:523 (1) - , same as from 04:47:325 - to 04:50:804 - except reversed. The way you have it now is the same as not having 04:50:536 (19) -
explained already on my ncs, tho I'll think about this suggestion more

xJ1 wrote:

Heya, from my mod queue

Being honest, I looked at this map over and over again and I couldn't find many notable mistakes
So... Here's what I could say

Insane:

00:03:719 (3) - This slider is straighter than the others
uhm

01:33:526 (1,2,3) - 01:35:064 (1,2,3) - 01:36:603 (1,2,3) - 01:38:141 (1,2,3) - 01:39:680 (1,2,3) - 02:53:526 (1,2,3) - 02:55:064 (1,2,3) - These are stacked as intended? Cuz for me it didn't make sense for the others to be but not these
01:38:910 (6,7) - And here
they are, stacked this way for symmetry

02:19:103 (8,9,10) - Could use better flow
changed this spot

03:41:762 (4,5,6) - Spacing here isn't equal
uhm, fixed

Sorry for the short mod, just map was very well made ^

1. 00:15:449 - unsnapped green point
   
2. 00:59:487 - kiai ends on 1/16th tick? why? same as 01:30:257 - shouldnt the kiai end here? why on the blue tick? also 04:51:529 - ends on a weird spot aswell, shouldn't it just end on white? Can you go over your kiais and adjust them to end/start on proper beatsnaps?

1. 00:05:064 (4,5) - this angle is very weird, maybe consider moving it like this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/rDcI6Vr2.png
   
2. 00:08:718 (7,1,2) - the pattern looks a bit cramped compared to most other patterns imo, perhaps some more visual distance will make it look better: https://voli.s-ul.eu/X9ehiK5q.png
   
3. 00:51:987 (10) - add nc here, remove it from 00:52:564 (1) - cuz stanza's (same goes for 01:22:756 (11) - and any subsequent patterns like this)
   
4. 00:59:486 (1) - also NCing spots like these (streams ending on a very strong sound) can make it stand out way better
   
5. 01:13:718 - sounds like this should have a clickable object as well, it's the start of the vocal sequence and also has a drum beat. perhaps a double with 01:13:910 (1) - ?
   
6. 01:59:680 (1,2) - what are you following here? why not the entire guitar sound with repeaters as you did here? 02:01:410 (6,7) -
   
7. 04:10:660 (6,1,2) - i feel (1) should be closer to (2) instead of (6) to separate these patterns better, the most spacing emphasis should be on 04:10:927 (1) - either way, not 04:11:061 (2) -
   
8. 04:13:603 (3) - maybe move it closer and more upwards to 04:13:871 (4) - aswell, the angle doesn't play that well now and jump isnt really justified imo
   
9. 04:16:279 (5) - nc for these strong sounds? 04:16:814 (8) - aswell and 04:17:349 (1) -
   
10. 04:26:580 (5,6) - wrong beat pairing, 04:26:580 (5) - should be in a pattern with 04:26:179 (2,3,4) - (4 notes for guitar and the slider for the clap). Same goes for 04:28:319 (2,3,4,5) - and subsequent similar patterns (there are quite a lot after this lol)
    
11. 04:43:034 (11) - nc should be here, not 04:43:302 (1) - here
    
12. 04:45:174 (11) - feels like a NC would do well here, combo gets really high there. 04:49:456 (13) - here aswell
    
13. 04:50:526 (19) - nc should be on this, not 04:50:794 (1) -
    
14. 04:51:864 - it would be nice if you could differentiate these patterns from the ones in this part 04:55:877 - , they are exactly the same but in different order. 04:56:144 (2) - also feel like they have way more power and warrant a bigger jump than the ones in the previous part.

Voli wrote:

hi, from q

[general]

1. 00:15:449 - unsnapped green point
   should be after 00:15:449 (2) , everything is fine
   
2. 00:59:487 - kiai ends on 1/16th tick? why? same as 01:30:257 - shouldnt the kiai end here? why on the blue tick? also 04:51:529 - ends on a weird spot aswell, shouldn't it just end on white? Can you go over your kiais and adjust them to end/start on proper beatsnaps?
   so the last object gets kiai time - flashes stars etc, actually much proper way to end kiais

[fall]

1. 00:05:064 (4,5) - this angle is very weird, maybe consider moving it like this? https://voli.s-ul.eu/rDcI6Vr2.png
   like it
   
2. 00:08:718 (7,1,2) - the pattern looks a bit cramped compared to most other patterns imo, perhaps some more visual distance will make it look better: https://voli.s-ul.eu/X9ehiK5q.png
   right
   
3. 00:51:987 (10) - add nc here, remove it from 00:52:564 (1) - cuz stanza's (same goes for 01:22:756 (11) - and any subsequent patterns like this)
   the logic behind all ncs described in the thread above, i don't see any big issues in the current way, actually that's just preference i think
   
4. 00:59:486 (1) - also NCing spots like these (streams ending on a very strong sound) can make it stand out way better
   
5. 01:13:718 - sounds like this should have a clickable object as well, it's the start of the vocal sequence and also has a drum beat. perhaps a double with 01:13:910 (1) - ?
   prefer to leave focus on 1 because of new really stong stanzas, beat skip helps with this great imo
   
6. 01:59:680 (1,2) - what are you following here? why not the entire guitar sound with repeaters as you did here? 02:01:410 (6,7) -
   rhythm progression for this part, it's a bit repetitive so i think progression can work here well
   
7. 04:10:660 (6,1,2) - i feel (1) should be closer to (2) instead of (6) to separate these patterns better, the most spacing emphasis should be on 04:10:927 (1) - either way, not 04:11:061 (2) -
   moved 2 closer
   
8. 04:13:603 (3) - maybe move it closer and more upwards to 04:13:871 (4) - aswell, the angle doesn't play that well now and jump isnt really justified imo
   right
   
9. 04:16:279 (5) - nc for these strong sounds? 04:16:814 (8) - aswell and 04:17:349 (1) -
   
10. 04:26:580 (5,6) - wrong beat pairing, 04:26:580 (5) - should be in a pattern with 04:26:179 (2,3,4) - (4 notes for guitar and the slider for the clap). Same goes for 04:28:319 (2,3,4,5) - and subsequent similar patterns (there are quite a lot after this lol)
    i see, ~variety, actually i believe that 5 is more like prebeat to the snare on 6 in this part
    
11. 04:43:034 (11) - nc should be here, not 04:43:302 (1) - here
    
12. 04:45:174 (11) - feels like a NC would do well here, combo gets really high there. 04:49:456 (13) - here aswell
    
13. 04:50:526 (19) - nc should be on this, not 04:50:794 (1) -
    all explanations about ncing are above in the thread
    
14. 04:51:864 - it would be nice if you could differentiate these patterns from the ones in this part 04:55:877 - , they are exactly the same but in different order. 04:56:144 (2) - also feel like they have way more power and warrant a bigger jump than the ones in the previous part.
    conceptual design actually, i find this way is really great and fun to play

cool song choice and unique map, call me back

Xanandra wrote:

ily

00:18:334 (1) - It feels more consistent if you were to stack this to 00:17:949 (7) - , but then it would end up too far, so what I actually suggest is to arrange 00:16:795 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - so that 00:17:949 (7) - will be end up closer to 00:18:526 (2) - like making them go left to right first and then bottom up (https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8809269), and then you can stack 00:18:334 (1) - under 00:17:949 (7) - (hope it was not too difficult to explain)
i don't believe forcing consistency is a must here, also there are lot of spots with no stacks 00:05:641 (7,1) - 00:28:526 (4,1) -

00:21:218 (10) - I did not expect this circle at all, like you have omitted this beat in many places and there doesnt seem to be any special about this beat to add it in here. Same with 00:24:295 (9) -
unique for this part, leaving this beats out will make part rally rhytm wise empty

00:56:603 (1) - I would have extended it so it would finish at 00:56:891 - to follow vocals more properly, only suggesting this because you have been doing this with the vocals before and found it weird you didnt here. Then, maybe add a circle at 00:57:276 - as well . Same with 00:58:141 (1) -
reasonable, 1\2 is actually intended here to simplify a bit stream catching

Pls come back!

1. Metadata confirmation

1. 00:15:834 (3) - technically they correspond with a different sound./instrument and could use a new combo.
   Note: 01:11:218 (3) - same idea
2. 00:20:834 (8,9,10) - 8-9 are actually stronger and have vocal support, hence they should be spaced bigger than (10). Consider placing (10) closer?
   Note: 00:23:910 (7,8,9) - same here, they just echo the previous beats
3. 00:34:680 (3,4) - is there a reason for the spacing increase? It feels a little artificial, if you ask me.
4. 00:54:102 (6,7,8,9,10) - (6) sounds pretty weak, is there really a reason to give it increased spacing? I'd probably try to sync jumps with the finish hitsounds for this pattern.
5. 01:02:179 (7,8,9,10,11) - the spacing change feels sort of too big, the music does not change that much and the pattern feels sort artificially exaggerated.
   Note: same goes for the other patterns of the kind as well.
6. 04:55:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - would be great to use consistent spacings for these patterns. It looks kind of fluctuating the way it is onw.
   
   Yeah

Bakari wrote:

You're literally less than a second away from being illegal.
that's the way i am, also.. i cheated but who actually cares

General

1. Metadata confirmation

fall
Why not write the difficulty name with the capital 'L', it'd look more natural, especially in the context where everything else is capitallized properly.
why not, i don't have any reasoning for 'f' anyway

1. 00:15:834 (3) - technically they correspond with a different sound./instrument and could use a new combo.
   Note: 01:11:218 (3) - same idea
   a bit too much for me, prefer to leave as it is
2. 00:20:834 (8,9,10) - 8-9 are actually stronger and have vocal support, hence they should be spaced bigger than (10). Consider placing (10) closer?
   Note: 00:23:910 (7,8,9) - same here, they just echo the previous beats
   right
3. 00:34:680 (3,4) - is there a reason for the spacing increase? It feels a little artificial, if you ask me.
   rearranged
4. 00:54:102 (6,7,8,9,10) - (6) sounds pretty weak, is there really a reason to give it increased spacing? I'd probably try to sync jumps with the finish hitsounds for this pattern.
   sounds right, rearranged a bit
5. 01:02:179 (7,8,9,10,11) - the spacing change feels sort of too big, the music does not change that much and the pattern feels sort artificially exaggerated.
   Note: same goes for the other patterns of the kind as well.
   they are not so drastically different, just a bit of a tiny jump.. following guitar riff.. i don't want to change them
6. 04:55:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - would be great to use consistent spacings for these patterns. It looks kind of fluctuating the way it is onw.
   this is to spread pattern more, i believe spacing is a minor thing here because of 1\2 gaps
   Yeah

TheMefisto wrote:

Ура, поздравляю!

ByBy wrote:

<3