thanks for the mod!Nao Tomori wrote:
bonjour mon ami
je viens de ma queue
ok idk how to speak french
[insane]
00:02:970 (5,6) - i got the impression that this rhythm was a bit too dense here, since it's right at the intro i think a 3/2 slider would fit better. since you start following the left hand piano with the slider repeat and end, it's weird to then make 00:03:525 (6) - clickable since it's not much louder than the ones in the slider. 00:02:970 (5) - Basically this slider was made to hold this right hand note : 00:02:970 - . The reverse 1/2 slider was just made to passively follow the left hand. Those circles 00:03:525 (6,7) - , are to me the most natural note after the slider.
00:07:599 (1,2,3) - i think https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7405930 is a better rhythm since 00:08:340 - doesn't have a sound that should be clickable imo and 00:08:155 - has a new note in the synth true, fixed
00:19:081 (5,6) -00:30:933 (5,6) - i think 5 should be a bigger jump than 6 since it has a strong drum hit and 6 has nothing 00:19:451 (1) - 00:31:303 (1) - would lost the thing I wanted. Which is, anti jump/normal spacing emphasis with flow
00:22:414 (1) - http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7405955 i suggest this rhythm to follow the vocals around here since imo the drum is not doing anything particularly interesting and it's cooler to follow vocals. the way it actually play, still follow the vocal, while also follow the lil guitare sound
00:34:081 - i think this one should have a stack on 00:34:266 (1) - head since you did that stack earlier (like 00:29:822 (1) - but the sounds and intensity are really different
00:36:673 (5,6,7) - this plays kind of awkwardly due to the wide angle with deceleration. I actually like how it flow with the snare on 00:36:859 (6) -
01:04:081 - this section should have same rhythm as 00:13:711 - all the other circles are pretty meaningless imo. you may not notice it. But those 2 sections, are, really different : about those pattern : 00:13:711 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - you can clearly hear, the fact there's absolutely, nothing there : 00:14:081 - . However, it's not the same case about those : 01:04:081 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - since, there's a real kick there 01:04:451 (3,6) -
01:09:081 (4,5,6) - i don't think this wide angle is good since it's really awkward to play. (or the next one xd) ye, I changed it
01:14:266 (1,2,3) - i don't think 3 is strong enough to warrant this awkward of a movement with an accelerating wide angle. I really lose my main structure by changing this. Also, the spacing is still fine according to how the map is mapped, so
01:17:414 (1,2,3) - this is also quite awkward was more or less intentional since a snare is really different from a tom
01:20:377 (1,2,3,4,5) - this pattern looks kinda weird with 5 being neither a line nor a curve and instead just being a slight adjustment it play just fine with 01:21:303 (6) - being a snare
01:28:711 (7,8) - this is yuuuuuge can you ctrl g 8? i don't remember using a spacing >3 ; so changed
01:30:377 (6,7,1) - wtf is this lmao yolo slider following vocal on red point
01:36:118 (6,7,1) - i highly advise against this kind of sudden movement, you never do this before and it's pretty weird movement to introduce this late into the map. since, the violon sound here, is quite unique on this part (and in this song) ; I prefer to keep the "sudden" spacing. It's sudden as the triplet note violon. And also, this pattern isn't hard as some other jump
01:45:562 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - all the 3s are bad imo since they reduce emphasis on the 1 and blah blah and the rhythm should be the same as 13 seconds in as well. same thing as earlier.
i don't really like the extensive use of wide angles that your style creates. it seems fairly inconsistent to me, as if wide angles are treated the same way as sharp ones with regard to spacing. that's a stylistic difference between us, nothing objective of course. good luck! we happen to have a really different style of map I guess, tbh, I've never seen your map, so I dunno