1. Ambient's Advanced (3.02 stars, 226 notes)
2. Anxient's Easy (1.67 stars, 100 notes)
3. Dream Fragments (5.98 stars, 572 notes)
4. Half's Normal (2.45 stars, 214 notes)
5. Mir's Extra (5.52 stars, 518 notes)
6. Ongaku's Another (4.94 stars, 459 notes)
7. Shiirngaku's Hyper (4.23 stars, 371 notes)

Einja wrote:

woah

Einja wrote:

woah

Einja wrote:

woah

Einja wrote:

woah

Einja wrote:

woah

1. Following the Difficulty Spread Guidlines, you'll need a Hard and maybe a Normal to bridge the gap between Anxient's Easy and Hyper. I assume you're waiting on a GD or are currently mapping one of those diffs though.
2. Convert .mp4 video to .wav as the former doesn't always work.

1. 00:03:876 (2,3) - Fix blanket, at lower difficulties, minor aesthetic imperfections are more noticeable due to larger CS and lower AR:
   
2. 00:06:645 (2,3) - ^
3. 00:08:799 (2,1) - Avoid overlapping these:
   
4. 00:34:953 (3) - NC, all combos in kiai are done once per measure.
5. 00:55:415 (2,3,2,3) - Consistency is something you should prioritize in lower difficulties. I would suggest moving one of the 3's so they are synchronized to the same tempo as the other: 00:56:338 (3) - move forward 1/2 tick or 00:58:953 (3) - move back 1/2 tick on timeline. I don't think the DS is enough to differentiate for new players.
6. 01:04:568 (1) - Spinner would go nice here
7. 01:15:876 (3) - Moving this back 1/2 tick suites the music better.
8. 01:21:415 (4,1) - If you go with the above suggestion, I would recommend starting the NC here on 4 because at this point the player has adjusted to seeing an NC after a large DS gap on the timeline.
9. I also suggest renaming to Anxient's Normal depending on whether or not a Normal and/or diff will be mapped.

1. 00:14:953 (1) - Remove NC
2. 00:46:645 (3) - NC for better readability, like you did with 00:51:568 (1)
3. 00:49:107 (3) - ^
4. 01:03:261 (4,6) - NC 4 or 6
5. 01:04:568 (1) - Great spot for a spinner
6. So far so good!

1. 00:09:415 (1) - Remove NC or move to 00:09:721 (4) - I think it looks better like this.
2. 00:11:568 (8,1) - Start NC on 8, beginning of new measure.
3. 00:16:492 (8,1) - ^
4. 00:12:722 (1) - Remove NC, I first thought it was on a 1/6 beat because that's what I think of when I see NC stream-notes.
5. 00:14:030 (7,1) - Start NC on 7
6. 00:18:953 (7,1) - ^
7. 00:17:492 (1,1,1) - Same as 00:12:722 (1)
8. 00:19:568 (1) - Remove NC
9. 00:54:184 (1) - ^
10. 01:23:876 (1) - ^
11. 01:04:568 (1) - Have you thought about putting a spinner here?
12. 01:23:107 (4) - NC
13. 01:26:030 (5,1) - Start NC on 5, then an aesthetic suggestion would be to then move 01:26:030 (1) - to overlap 01:25:568 (2) or 01:25:722 (3) :
    
14. 01:25:415 (1,2,3) - 01:26:184 (2,3,4) - Not sure if it was your intention, but these aren't exactly lined up straight.
15. 01:35:876 (5,1) - Same as above suggestion about NC and moving 1.
16. 01:36:799 (1) - Remove NC
17. 01:43:568 (1) - ^

1. 01:03:568 (4,5,6) - I think you should NC one of these, maybe 5.
2. 01:04:568 (1) - Spinner here?
3. 01:14:799 (1,2) - Move NC to 2
4. 01:16:799 (4,1) - Start NC on 4
   The above two NC suggestions streamlines consistency to match the rest of the bookmarked section.

1. 00:00:953 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I actually don't mind the pattern, I just think the almost and barely overlapping circles and sliders are distracting. Consider spacing them out more or overlapping more. Like how 00:01:107 (2,1) - 00:01:107 (2,1) - these two overlap and 00:01:569 (2,1) - the slider heads/borders, NOT the slider bodies; those are fine.
   
2. 00:06:645 (3) - hehe NC for lols
3. 00:18:338 (4) - NC, similar to 00:14:030 (1)
4. 00:39:415 (6) - NC, similar to 00:29:568 (1)
5. 01:04:530 (1) - You know what would be awesome here? A spinner ;o
6. 01:24:953 (5) - NC
7. 01:26:645 (5) - ^
8. 01:28:492 (5) - ^
9. 01:30:953 (5) - ^
   The goal of the previous four NCs is to have two combos per measure until the stream at 01:31:568 (1)
10. 01:36:030 (8,1) - Start NC on 8

Bluekrait wrote:

[Ongaku's Another]

1. 00:09:415 (1) - Remove NC or move to 00:09:721 (4) - I think it looks better like this. applied
2. 00:11:568 (8,1) - Start NC on 8, beginning of new measure.
3. 00:16:492 (8,1) - ^
4. 00:12:722 (1) - Remove NC, I first thought it was on a 1/6 beat because that's what I think of when I see NC stream-notes. fine
5. 00:14:030 (7,1) - Start NC on 7
6. 00:18:953 (7,1) - ^
7. 00:17:492 (1,1,1) - Same as 00:12:722 (1)
8. 00:19:568 (1) - Remove NC
9. 00:54:184 (1) - ^ going to keep this NC cuz the pattern breaks
10. 01:23:876 (1) - ^ keeping
11. 01:04:568 (1) - Have you thought about putting a spinner here? Shiirn hates spinners, so he removed them
12. 01:23:107 (4) - NC
13. 01:26:030 (5,1) - Start NC on 5, then an aesthetic suggestion would be to then move 01:26:030 (1) - to overlap 01:25:568 (2) or 01:25:722 (3) :
    
    I prefer the current pattern i have right now
    
14. 01:25:415 (1,2,3) - 01:26:184 (2,3,4) - Not sure if it was your intention, but these aren't exactly lined up straight. It looks fine to me,
    I dont want to waste 5 minutes trying to line it up perfectly lol
15. 01:35:876 (5,1) - Same as above suggestion about NC and moving 1.
16. 01:36:799 (1) - Remove NC keeping
17. 01:43:568 (1) - ^ keeping

Bluekrait wrote:

[Dream Fragments]

1. 00:00:953 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I actually don't mind the pattern, I just think the almost and barely overlapping circles and sliders are distracting. Consider spacing them out more or overlapping more. Like how 00:01:107 (2,1) - 00:01:107 (2,1) - these two overlap and 00:01:569 (2,1) - the slider heads/borders, NOT the slider bodies; those are fine.
   
2. 00:06:645 (3) - hehe NC for lols
3. 00:18:338 (4) - NC, similar to 00:14:030 (1)
4. 00:39:415 (6) - NC, similar to 00:29:568 (1)
5. 01:04:530 (1) - You know what would be awesome here? A spinner ;o
6. 01:24:953 (5) - NC
7. 01:26:645 (5) - ^
8. 01:28:492 (5) - ^
9. 01:30:953 (5) - ^
   The goal of the previous four NCs is to have two combos per measure until the stream at 01:31:568 (1)
10. 01:36:030 (8,1) - Start NC on 8

Bluekrait wrote:

[Mir's Extra]

1. 01:03:568 (4,5,6) - I think you should NC one of these, maybe 5.
2. 01:04:568 (1) - Spinner here? - no thanks
3. 01:14:799 (1,2) - Move NC to 2
4. 01:16:799 (4,1) - Start NC on 4
   The above two NC suggestions streamlines consistency to match the rest of the bookmarked section.

Nozhomi wrote:

I hope it's not badly mapped, I could be interested~

Nozhomi wrote:

I hope it's not badly mapped

Nozhomi wrote:

badly mapped

1. tbh I don't know if the video is worth it...most people have them off by default in their settings and its 20 mb...imo you should just link it in the description
2. The gap between Advanced and Hyper is waaay too big, both settings-wise and actual map difficulty-wise...like, this NEEDS an in-between
3. OD on Hyper is higher than Another

• 
  holy you are way too fond of overlaps

1. 00:02:184 (2,1) - they're touchin tips and it's kinda gay
2. 00:10:184 (2,3,1) - 0.40x 00:11:184 (2,3) - 0.25x 00:12:722 (3,1) - 0.20x 00:16:107 (2,3) - 0.32x...literally the whole section you refuse to be consistent with your 1/4 spacing. what is this lmao it makes no sense
3. 00:17:722 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - hella hard to read, especially 00:18:184 (3,4,5) - this part
4. 00:34:645 (3,4,1) - I realize you've structured around this so it might not be easy to change but this is an awkward jerk to play
   
   I think in general a lot of these overlaps esp in the fast parts aren't that merited and just make things a lot harder to read but for obvious reasons I won't list them

1. I don't really see any complex patterns that need stack leniency to be so low so I think you should raise it to make those 1/2 stacks more readable
2. 00:11:876 (2,6) - Why is one of those ever so slightly tilted and the other isn't, I'm so tilted (ha), I think you should point this one 00:12:645 (6) - more towards the next object so it plays and looks less awkward
3. 00:17:722 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Not really important but why all these right angles, it feels so 2009 lol
4. 00:22:953 (3,4) - fix blanket xd
5. 00:24:722 (6,7) - Space these closer? It's the first such pattern so would probably be played as 1/2 gap
6. 00:26:953 (5) - What the hell is this sliderend snapped to? There's literally no sound there??? Plz snap properly
7. 00:27:261 (6) - This spacing makes me think the previous slider was supposed to be 1/4 snap and you just somehow fucked it up but anyway yeah with the current snap of the previous slider this spacing is unaccceptable
8. 00:31:568 (3,4) - These two sliders are shaped differently, pls make them the same
9. 00:52:184 (1) - This buzz is kinda ugly xd
10. 00:54:645 (1,1) - Why are these both NC? Nothing in song or even map to suggest NC, same with 00:57:107 (1,1) - 00:59:568 (1,1) - 01:02:030 (1,2,3,1,2) -
11. 00:55:107 (1,2) - fix blanket xd
12. 00:57:107 (1,1) - fix blanket xd
13. 00:59:415 (8,1) - fix blanket xd
14. 01:00:030 (1,2) - fix blanket xd
15. 01:02:030 (1,2,3,1,2) - Plays kinda weirdly
16. 01:24:184 (1) - Kinda confused me a little my first play
17. 01:26:953 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Not really feeling like this 1-2-1-2 grouping makes sense with the song here and it kinda throws me off
18. 01:34:338 (3) - pls move 5 pixels left thx
19. 01:34:799 (5) - pls move 2 pixels left thx
20. 01:43:261 (5) - NC should be based on song first and foremost, going off your NC scheme this should be NC too

1. 00:00:492 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2) - tbh this is really ugly, can you make it look less 2008
2. 00:04:646 (1) - If your whole shtick in that section is quiet sliderends, then this one breaks the pattern and it's super awkward and you should probably not force this slider here for the sake of your pattern
3. 00:07:261 (5) - nazi: blanket needs a little work
4. 00:12:645 (1,1,1) - Spread issue: questionable that you have 1/8 here even though Mir did not
5. 00:13:030 (2,3) - Based on the spacing so far one might read this as 1/4
6. 00:22:184 (1) - There is no distinct sound here that you mapped to, this is basically a useless slider and you should get rid of it
7. 00:26:568 (2,3) - Not sure if this is meant to be slightly offstacked
8. 00:38:030 (1,1) - They're 1 pixel off on x and y
9. 00:54:645 (1) - blanket needs a little work
10. 00:59:568 (1) - I think you wanted to place this a little bit more to the right

1. I was willing to forgive a little more in the higher diffs but the sheer amount of overlaps in this diff is not at all appropriate for a Hyper and makes it excessively hard to read
2. Raise stack leniency so the Hyper players don't get fucked on those 1/2 stacks xd
3. 00:00:492 - to 00:10:338 - literally this ENTIRE first section is WAY too unreadable for a Hyper, ex. patterns like 00:02:953 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
4. 00:26:876 (2,3) - Questionable spacing, not sure on first glance if this is 1/4 or 1/2 gap
5. 00:30:645 (4,5) - Questionable overlap, same here 00:40:491 (4,5) - (I allowed the previous one because both sliderheads were near each other)
6. 00:46:645 (3,4,1) - bad form to have same spacing but 1/1 here instead of 1/2 right before
7. 00:55:415 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - holy unreadable and confusing to play, batman (same here 01:00:338 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - )
8. 00:58:030 (2,1,2,3) - not smart choice of spacing
9. 01:02:030 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - holy fuck this is even worse what were you guys thinking look at this, esp the 3-4
10. 01:32:722 (7,1) - again questionable spacing, but since this isn't the first time I guess it's a little more forgivable
    
    imo this needs a whole lot of work

1. Hitsound it xd
2. 00:01:415 (4,5) - Not entirely sure where Advanced falls on the "don't break DS, ever" type of deal but I don't really see you do this kind of DS break again in that section so you might as well just make it DS legal
3. 00:10:030 (8,1) - Blanket needs a little work
4. 00:15:261 (1,2) - It's a little ugly
5. 00:23:568 (4,5) - blanket fix
6. 00:36:184 (5,6) - not really curved enough for a full blanket but move it a little so it looks neater
7. 00:58:492 (4,6) - You should rotate either 4 or 6 so they're more parallel
8. 01:16:338 (6,1) - curve just a bit more for good blanket <3
9. 01:34:030 (1) - again, not sure if this DS break is kosher or not lol
10. 01:36:184 (8,1,2,3,4) - this many short repeats might be a little overwhelming for Advanced players, same with 01:41:415 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) -

1. 00:03:876 (2,3) - blanket fix xd
2. 00:06:645 (2,3) - blanket fix xd
3. 00:17:722 (3,4) - this overlap? in an easy? sketchy as hell
4. 01:29:415 (1) - Not entirely sure how ok this is, but that's sus

Zexous wrote:

1. 00:02:184 (2,1) - they're touchin tips and it's kinda gay

Zexous wrote:

[Ongaku's Another]

1. 00:00:492 (1,2,1,2,1,1,2,1,2,1,2) - tbh this is really ugly, can you make it look less 2008 looks fine to me, stuck with the gimmick until 00:04:953 - , so I think its fine.
2. 00:04:646 (1) - If your whole shtick in that section is quiet sliderends, then this one breaks the pattern and it's super awkward and you should probably not force this slider here for the sake of your pattern oops, missed one
3. 00:07:261 (5) - nazi: blanket needs a little work w/e
4. 00:12:645 (1,1,1) - Spread issue: questionable that you have 1/8 here even though Mir did not we're not the same person, I think this is fine, But ill think about it.
5. 00:13:030 (2,3) - Based on the spacing so far one might read this as 1/4 removed the slider, added circles
6. 00:22:184 (1) - There is no distinct sound here that you mapped to, this is basically a useless slider and you should get rid of it the small woosh sound. It's pretty distinct since its the only sound right before the next section
7. 00:26:568 (2,3) - Not sure if this is meant to be slightly offstacked intended, I get triggered by the default stacking
8. 00:38:030 (1,1) - They're 1 pixel off on x and y blame the editor stacking, not me
9. 00:54:645 (1) - blanket needs a little work w/e
10. 00:59:568 (1) - I think you wanted to place this a little bit more to the right looks fine to me

MaridiuS wrote:

[ongaku's another]
00:02:799 (2) - I strongly suggest making this a slider, the following 2 notes are a chore to play, and it fits the structure imo. keeping, otherwise 00:02:953 - will just sound weirder
00:10:338 (1,2,3) - can you make em be visually spaced identically? http://i.imgur.com/WFJOt2U.jpg just move (2) a bit to the left. k
00:14:953 (3,4,5,6) - 00:19:261 (1,2,3,4) - - I suggest making em reversed 1/4 sliders, don't really approve them, the structure is really varied, and this is unneeded imo. they're fine as they are, 1/4 reverse would actually just make it even weirder.
00:25:261 (2) - wish that you put it x:131: y:1 or something, to make it a bit away from the slider. fine as it is, otherwise I'll have to change the whole DS of that specific pattern
00:30:030 (1,2,3,4) - idk but this seems a bit hard to read comapred to rhythmically same patterns. Think you should tone down the overlaps the bit, and if you could make the flow a bit more easier to grasp. The flow is no different than a back and forth. I played it quite fine when i tested it.
00:31:261 (1) - think this needs more emphasis as much emphasis it'll get without breaking aesthetics
00:35:107 (2,4) - mentioned this kind of pattern before. same comment
00:52:184 (1) - why does this look so trippy wew dunno, its distinct so
01:00:645 (3) - wow nice wave slider riding it
mm this difficulty too complicated for me. gitgud

Zexous wrote:

rushing out all the mods I need to do before I get busy again

[General]

1. tbh I don't know if the video is worth it...most people have them off by default in their settings and its 20 mb...imo you should just link it in the description fuck you
2. The gap between Advanced and Hyper is waaay too big, both settings-wise and actual map difficulty-wise...like, this NEEDS an in-between fuck you
3. OD on Hyper is higher than Another fuck you wait shit ur right

[Dream Fragments]

• 
  holy you are way too fond of overlaps fuck you

1. 00:02:184 (2,1) - they're touchin tips and it's kinda gay you'r gay
2. 00:10:184 (2,3,1) - 0.40x 00:11:184 (2,3) - 0.25x 00:12:722 (3,1) - 0.20x 00:16:107 (2,3) - 0.32x...literally the whole section you refuse to be consistent with your 1/4 spacing. what is this lmao it makes no sense variations this small hardly make any difference to readability, do they?
3. 00:17:722 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - hella hard to read, especially 00:18:184 (3,4,5) - this part by this time the player realizes what kind of patterns and structure are being used
4. 00:34:645 (3,4,1) - I realize you've structured around this so it might not be easy to change but this is an awkward jerk to play i can actually fix this one up
   
   I think in general a lot of these overlaps esp in the fast parts aren't that merited and just make things a lot harder to read but for obvious reasons I won't list them it's good to get a different perspective sometimes, even if that perspective is a nonsensical "i hate overlaps they raped my sister and cucked my father" kinda thing

[Mir's Extra]

1. 00:26:953 (5) - What the hell is this sliderend snapped to? There's literally no sound there??? Plz snap properly This was my fault.
2. 00:54:645 (1,1) - Why are these both NC? Nothing in song or even map to suggest NC, same with 00:57:107 (1,1) - 00:59:568 (1,1) - 01:02:030 (1,2,3,1,2) - These are new combos for the video and fit the pulses in the metronome anyway
3. 01:43:261 (5) - NC should be based on song first and foremost, going off your NC scheme this should be NC too Fixed, this was my error.

[Shiirngaku's Hyper]

1. I was willing to forgive a little more in the higher diffs but the sheer amount of overlaps in this diff is not at all appropriate for a Hyper and makes it excessively hard to read as mentioned before, I'm mapping for people who can play this game, not people who play whack-an-approach-circle.
2. Raise stack leniency so the Hyper players don't get fucked on those 1/2 stacks xd
3. 00:00:492 - to 00:10:338 - literally this ENTIRE first section is WAY too unreadable for a Hyper, ex. patterns like 00:02:953 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6) - As i told you, i've had many playtests, and a mere minor portion of the playerbase just seems incapable of reading overlaps and that's, well, unfortunate for them.
4. 00:26:876 (2,3) - Questionable spacing, not sure on first glance if this is 1/4 or 1/2 gap I suppose so, but I tend to feel like people overstate reading issues like this because they're not actually listening to the music
5. 00:30:645 (4,5) - Questionable overlap, same here 00:40:491 (4,5) - (I allowed the previous one because both sliderheads were near each other) i literally do not understand how this is questionable, do you think it's impossible to see partially obscured objects, or something?
6. 00:46:645 (3,4,1) - bad form to have same spacing but 1/1 here instead of 1/2 right before agree entirely
7. 00:55:415 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - holy unreadable and confusing to play, batman (same here 01:00:338 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - ) again, stacking sometimes confuses some players, i can't work around that minority
8. 00:58:030 (2,1,2,3) - not smart choice of spacing agree
9. 01:02:030 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - holy fuck this is even worse what were you guys thinking look at this, esp the 3-4 shhhhh this was just me
10. 01:32:722 (7,1) - again questionable spacing, but since this isn't the first time I guess it's a little more forgivable
    
    imo this needs a whole lot of work literally the only parts u had issue with were overlaps being hard to read (I really don't think they are) and a few questionalbe spacings which i fixed (the only thing ongaku mapped that u had issue with was 1:32, we swapped at break and that's it)

[Ambient's Advanced]

1. Hitsound it xd SHIT MY BAD
2. 00:01:415 (4,5) - Not entirely sure where Advanced falls on the "don't break DS, ever" type of deal but I don't really see you do this kind of DS break again in that section so you might as well just make it DS legal fixed
3. 00:10:030 (8,1) - Blanket needs a little work fixed
4. 00:15:261 (1,2) - It's a little ugly not a blanket so uhhh meh
5. 00:23:568 (4,5) - blanket fix fixed
6. 00:36:184 (5,6) - not really curved enough for a full blanket but move it a little so it looks neater fixed
7. 00:58:492 (4,6) - You should rotate either 4 or 6 so they're more parallel looks fine to me
8. 01:16:338 (6,1) - curve just a bit more for good blanket <3 fixed
9. 01:34:030 (1) - again, not sure if this DS break is kosher or not lol I think it's kosher
10. 01:36:184 (8,1,2,3,4) - this many short repeats might be a little overwhelming for Advanced players, same with 01:41:415 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - well said hypothetical advanced players will get to learn fast or fail

[Anxient's Easy]

1. 00:03:876 (2,3) - blanket fix xd not a blanket
2. 00:06:645 (2,3) - blanket fix xd not a blanket
3. 00:17:722 (3,4) - this overlap? in an easy? sketchy as hell i'll... have anxient do this
4. 01:29:415 (1) - Not entirely sure how ok this is, but that's sus

ez only took me like 4 hrs