Sure, go aheadMir wrote:
#modreqs yay
I'm also mapping this song. Can I steal your metadata? It's more accurate than what I have tbh.
I probably won't have time to fix these until tomorrow, but I've seen some good points in both mods.
WISPG_G wrote:
hello, Light Mod from my queue
- Niamh
- 00:11:799 (3,4) - jump like this should be on this 00:12:163 (5) - strong beat, this 00:11:799 (3,4) - two notes can be stacked actually yeah, don't know why I didn't think about this before
- 00:13:981 - 00:14:345 - 00:14:526 - 00:14:708 - similar sounds, 00:13:799 (2,3) - and 00:14:345 (4,5,6) - jumps, but here 00:13:981 (3,4) - no jump? btw suddenly high spacing for chill part like this. The high spacing in this part is to represent the build-up in the strings on the background, also I was going for a kinda floaty feel here in the beggining of the map. Te absence of a jump at 00:13:981 is there since while testing having all jumps throughout this section was way too confusing, it also helps me set up the next pattern.
- 00:17:617 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - confusing part, I dont understand what you following here 00:17:617 (1) follows the string, then I switch to the drum sound at 00:18:345 (2) since every sound in the song except that suddenly stops. The only confusing thing I see here is 00:18:708 (3) which is mapped to that background scratch on the song and I absolutely need because otherwise this section would feel way too empty.
- 00:19:867 (1) - I hear like this slider starts later imo, try listen audio carefully, looks like there might be multi-timing As far as I can tell the slider does actually start there However, there's no actual sound at 00:20:526 (3), so I fixed that.
- 00:25:639 (6,1) - jump please for strong beat, try ctrl+G 00:26:003 (1,2) - them yep
- 01:16:526 (1,2,3) - , 01:17:617 (4,5,6) - dont you want make patterns like this smoother? there can be better triangles than this Sure, I'll try to make them neater as best as I can.
- 01:28:526 (6,7) - feels like 1/2, spacing same as here 01:28:163 (5,6) - Nope, no actual sound at 01:28:708 - this is 1/4
- 02:17:981 (2,3) - , 02:19:435 (7,1) - too low for that strong beat, looks like 1/4 fixed both
- 03:31:799 - again disbalanced spacing... 03:32:890 (4,5) - 1/4, but 03:33:254 (5,6) - 1/2? fixed
- 04:01:254 (3,4,5) - 3 sliders could be better imo Changed to current due to some mods pointing otherwise (repetition of same sounds in these parts lend themselves well to this kind of slider)
That's it from me
Good luck! o/
Thank you both for your modsMir wrote:
#modreqs yay
I'm also mapping this song. Can I steal your metadata? It's more accurate than what I have tbh.Niahm[Niahm]
- 00:40:526 (4) - Do you not wanna emphasize that really noticeable chime? Even just changing the flow of this slider could emphasize that sound well. It's not strong enough to me to justify breaking the flow/pattern. I think hitsounds more than make up for it, tbh.
- 00:50:254 - There should be a note here if you plan to map this 1/4. Actually, I'm remapping this whole section.
- 01:07:072 (6,7) - Could make this a 1/4 slider to get the guitar and the cymbals I think it is as two seperate sounds. Or rather, two sounds that while the same timing are played differently because they're different sounds. I hope this makes sense. originally had that, changed due to mods (felt weird to play, a continuous stream actually has better feedback)
- 02:03:435 (1) - You don't really need this new combo. Since there's no SV change. If anything you'd want to NC 02:04:163 (5) - instead. Removed NC, but a nc for 02:04:163 (5) - seems pointless to me since it's just one object?
- 02:04:708 - This particular sound, uh.. flute I think? Is consistently being skipped. I don't know why tbh, since there isn't a sound on 02:04:799 - at all. It would make more sense rhythmically if you shortened these sliders to the red tick. This is for all kiais of the same melody. mapping to the drums, and since there's no drum sound on any of the red ticks I extend to the blue one.
- 02:07:708 (4) - There is no sound here, so I don't see a reason for this triple. there's a faint drum hit there though
- 02:12:890 (8,9,10,11) - I really have to listen hard to hear what this is mapped to. You can keep it, but I wouldn't map it, personally. Since there's a reasonable enough sound to map to and it adds variance to the section I'm keeping it.
- 02:21:708 - There should be a note here too if you intend to map this to 1/4. yep
- 02:38:345 (1) - This played awkwardly for me; personally, I'd map this as two circles. It's up to you though - starting streams after a slider end on a blue tick is usually awkward. sure
- 02:39:163 (7) - No sound here and it plays awkwardly because of that. I didn't expect a triple, yet I got one. Also starting a triple after a 4 or 5 note burst is also really taxing on finger control, which I don't really think represents the song well. It's a pretty simple song to follow, so I don't think it should be mapped in a complex way. Just personal opinion though. but there is a triplet there? I mean, the drum actually goes 1/4 all the way throughout 02:38:345 (1,1) - but since most of it is so faint I've only mapped to the strong parts.
- 02:39:617 - Now you skip whatever this sound is (hi-hat?). It's not AS bad, but again 3/4 sliders play really weird here. same as before, and I'm following the same rhythm as before
- 03:16:163 (6) - Maybe two circles to emphasize that high-pitched instrument. (if you haven't noticed by now I have no clue what instruments are which) Same with the other instances such as 03:20:526 (6). nope, I want this section to be really calm while you play it, so I'm sticking to the main sounds only (mostly the drum/really big flute kicks).
- 03:22:890 (7) - There is super audible sound here that I think is worth mapping. Even more so since you're following the piano thing, which I feel would be better if you mapped it like so: You could shorten 03:22:526 (6) - by one tick and put a 1/2 slider at 03:22:708 - to capture all of the piano thing. In fact, you even did it at 03:31:254 (4,5) - so why not here too? As I mentioned, i'm being as calm as I possibly can here by sticking only to the main sounds. The one at 03:31:254 (4,5) is there to make the transition to the next section smoother. Also the buzz piano actually holds in this place longer than the one at 03:31:254
- 03:40:163 (8,9,10,11) - It's really hard to hear what this is mapped to as well, same as above but I can understand this one a little more because it fits with the hihat thing. I would still recommend removing it. keeping it, same reasons as above
- 03:42:345 (6) - Two circles to emphasize the flute? Same with other cases like 02:15:072 (6). drums
- 03:52:890 - 03:53:254 - 03:53:435 - should definitely be clickable in my opinion. These are very noticeable sounds. You weren't against making 03:54:163 (2,3,4) - clickable so I don't see why not here. yes to 03:53:254 (5) -, no to 03:52:890 - since the piano holds there and a slider fits better IMO
- 04:01:254 (3,1) - These are pretty noticeable sounds yet I feel they're underemphasized. Even two 1/2 sliders would emphasize these sounds better. I originally though the same, but this has been changed due to lots of modders pointing that a repeat slider would fit better the sounds repeating themselves here.
- 04:19:254 (3,4,1) - This flow is kind of awkward. Moving linear from the slider end to 3 to 4 then a 3.74x 1/1 jump to 04:19:799 (1). It plays weird imo and a little bit overdone too. reduced the jump a bit. I'll try to come up with something better for this, but for now I'm keeping it.
- 04:30:435 (6) - This is unneeded, no sound here. Same with 04:39:163 (6) - yes to both
- 04:32:072 (5) - Is it just me or should this note be at 04:31:890 - and not where it is now? oh, yeah, nice catch
- 04:34:890 (6) - There is no noticeable sound here. I suggest making 04:34:708 (5) - a 1/2 slider if you want to fill that gap. Same with 04:37:072 (7) - yep, but on 04:37:072 (7) - there is a drum hit though
- 04:54:163 (4,6) - I don't hear anything for these two notes. 04:54:163 (4) - definitely has a hi-hat kick, 6 actually is there because it felt really empty with nothing there. Circle actually works better than slider here, I tried.
- 04:58:526 (4) - + 1 reverse? nope, the buzz is really short here, similar to 02:03:981 (6,7) -
- 05:16:072 (3) - I don't hear anything here. Could remove. same rhythm as 02:21:435 (2,3,4,5,6) -
- 05:22:890 (1) - This is a beautiful slider. \o/ thank you
Overall it's a good map! Good luck with this.~
Updated !