125601228 wrote:

02:39:568 (851,852,853,854,855,856,857,858,859) - https://goo.gl/photos/yWhmRpG8UjX1wrND8

Other need revise are not too much this pattern should mirror the one at 02:42:737 (873,874,875,876,877,878,879,880,881,882,883) - so I'll keep it

good luck

thanks

Namki wrote:

idk if this finisher here was skipped on purpose 02:30:272 - but it seems kinda off according to 02:37:033 - / 03:10:836 - / 03:17:596 -
I skipped the finisher to emphasise the transition to the next section, but for consistency's sake I'll change it.
also, 00:32:174 (111,112,113,114) - you may want to make 00:32:491 (113) - d, it would be logical if 00:32:491 (113,114) - was the same pattern as 00:32:174 (111,112) - because sound is the same as for me. no so sure about this one, I find that a kk plays better, and there's definely enough sound to support it. I'll see what Volta says about it.
great map, good luck

1. 00:32:174 (111,112,113,114,115) - how about change to kk-kk-d instead? following the previous k-d-k-d pattern it would be more intuitive to make (111) as k. and (115) doesn't worth finisher imo since sound is not strong enough there, and is comparable with 00:12:526 -
2. 00:39:357 (152,153) - swap? drum at (152) sounds same with (151) so this might suits better.
   00:41:047 - change to k? i think it would suits better with the violin. and i feels more dynamic this way
3. 00:56:681 (243,244,245) - maybe change to kdk to have more varied pattern at this part? just because 00:58:371 (253,254,255) - this ddk feels out of consistency with previous two kkd
4. 01:02:596 (279,280) - i like how you mapped this with whistle lol
5. 02:22:984 - consider to add k? i think the atmosphere here is as intense as 02:09:462 -
   02:23:406 - ^
6. 02:18:758 - change to d? currently the pattern seems doesn't work best considering the song's nature
7. 02:30:272 - i assume this already has given a finisher
8. 03:14:216 (1086,1087,1088,1089,1090) - i feels like this pattern is kinda unfit here. how about change to dddkd?
9. 03:18:441 (1) - spinner can end at 03:24:779 - instead i guess.
10. 03:31:751 (42,43) - swap so (43) will have a d like start of this session? (03:25:202 - ), feels more consistent this way through this session (with 03:38:723 - , 03:45:484 - )
11. 03:53:723 (1) - end at 04:00:695 - ?
12. 04:44:094 - maybe try move to 04:44:305 - ? this arrangement feels more flowy than 2 triplet (refer to 04:37:333 - too)

Volta wrote:

hi, sorry for kept you waitin

[High Tower]

1. 00:32:174 (111,112,113,114,115) - how about change to kk-kk-d instead? following the previous k-d-k-d pattern it would be more intuitive to make (111) as k. and (115) doesn't worth finisher imo since sound is not strong enough there, and is comparable with 00:12:526 - Agree with this, finally gets rid of all of my indecisiveness about this part too
2. 00:39:357 (152,153) - swap? drum at (152) sounds same with (151) so this might suits better. I like it! Makes the flow better going into the kdk too.
   00:41:047 - change to k? i think it would suits better with the violin. and i feels more dynamic this way Thought of doing this after reading the last point already, done did it.
3. 00:56:681 (243,244,245) - maybe change to kdk to have more varied pattern at this part? just because 00:58:371 (253,254,255) - this ddk feels out of consistency with previous two kkd Sounds good, works well since the intro to the part is a dkdkd too.
4. 01:02:596 (279,280) - i like how you mapped this with whistle lol thx
5. 02:22:984 - consider to add k? i think the atmosphere here is as intense as 02:09:462 - added k for consistency
   02:23:406 - ^ want to keep some singletaps at the end to emphasize the incoming chorus as much as possible
6. 02:18:758 - change to d? currently the pattern seems doesn't work best considering the song's nature changed
7. 02:30:272 - i assume this already has given a finisher it does.
8. 03:14:216 (1086,1087,1088,1089,1090) - i feels like this pattern is kinda unfit here. how about change to dddkd? I want to try keeping it similar to 03:12:526 (1074,1075,1076,1077,1078) - and 03:11:047 (1064,1065,1066,1067,1068) - . I feel like a handswitch pattern would mess that up a bit.
9. 03:18:441 (1) - spinner can end at 03:24:779 - instead i guess. agree
10. 03:31:751 (42,43) - swap so (43) will have a d like start of this session? (03:25:202 - ), feels more consistent this way through this session (with 03:38:723 - , 03:45:484 - ) very nice catch , changed.
11. 03:53:723 (1) - end at 04:00:695 - ? The sound ends a tiiiiny bit before the white tick but this is better anyway. Changed.
12. 04:44:094 - maybe try move to 04:44:305 - ? this arrangement feels more flowy than 2 triplet (refer to 04:37:333 - too) me likey, changed aswell!

you may call me back after that~

1. Boost the volume. The song isn't quiet by far, and the hitsounds lose a lot of their feedback in my opinion. +10% all lines is fine, though I'd go further.
2. 01:02:596 (279,280) - LOL
3. 02:30:484 (791) - d? kkd works at 02:31:329 - , but here the songs doing something else. ddd works too. Choose to make it as consistent as you'd like with
4. 02:37:244 (836,837,838,839,840) - etc etc, just kkd in that case it's kinda weird. Again at 03:17:807 (1107,1108,1109) -
5. 04:08:930 - please go all out here she's trying her hardest

OzzyOzrock wrote:

[Rapherino]

1. Boost the volume. The song isn't quiet by far, and the hitsounds lose a lot of their feedback in my opinion. +10% all lines is fine, though I'd go further. KikuoHana - Nobore! Susume! Takai Tou (BASS BOOSTED 10%)
2. 01:02:596 (279,280) - LOL I COULDN'T RESIST
3. 02:30:484 (791) - d? kkd works at 02:31:329 - , but here the songs doing something else. ddd works too. Choose to make it as consistent as you'd like with
4. 02:37:244 (836,837,838,839,840) - etc etc, just kkd in that case it's kinda weird. Again at 03:17:807 (1107,1108,1109) - changed both to ddd
5. 04:08:930 - please go all out here she's trying her hardest idk, I kinda like that there aren't any patterns longer than quints until after the spinner

Rest idc it's fking cUTE u2

Stjpa wrote:

osu needs a lot more KikuoHana

already excited for the new album wheeeeeee