returning m4m
[General]
nice tags LUL
the spread between Normal and Hard is pretty significant though, normal has very few 1/2 patterns yet hard is almost full of 1/2, might want to add a diff in the middle
[Easy]
00:56:164 - inconsistent kiai with other diffs
00:18:450 (3) - guess there should be a NC since you seem to be NCing every 2 beats
00:33:878 (3) - this would sound better on 00:33:735 - to follow the vocals
00:47:021 (3) - this should be NC just like 00:42:450 (1) - is
[Normal]
00:02:450 - you could map this rhythm just like you did at 00:04:735 - which follows the instruments better
01:00:164 (4) - you could turn this into 2 1/2 sliders, it's pretty intense and you mapped less important sounds with 1/2 sliders
[Hard]
so about the ds shifting between 1/1 and 1/2s here, it makes some patterns like 00:15:592 (3,4,1) - dangerously close to each other and could be mistaken for 1/2 rhythms
00:18:450 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - why is this rhythm so different from 00:23:021 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - which has about the same intensity yet is much denser? i suggest you follow the second rhythm since it follows the music better
00:35:592 (1,2,3,4) - so this is the only time you have this type of pattern for those lyrics in the whole kiai time yet 00:40:164 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - and 00:44:735 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - are the exact same, you should at least either make all 3 the same thing or make another type of pattern for more diversity
00:40:450 (2,3) - that's a really large jump for a hard diff at this bpm tbh, you could try to place 3,4 closer to 1,2 so the spacing is bigger between 00:41:021 (4,1) - which would make more sense, though it should still be smaller than what you currently have imo
00:48:735 (5,6) - again those are painfully simple although this is supposedly the most important part of the song, what about
this rhythm?
00:57:164 (1) - 00:58:878 (1) - i believe those should not be NCs? they feel really out of place compared to what you did in other diffs
[Insane]
00:09:878 (3,4) - these don't feel like they should be as spaced compared to 00:09:307 (1,2) - as they're only slightly more intense
00:15:307 (2,3) - you could turn these into a 1/2 slider since they sound the same as 00:15:021 (1) -
00:15:592 (4,5) - i don't really see why those are stacked on 2 and 3 since they're barely similar
00:50:450 (1,2,3,4) - this looks kinda messy
you could make another square
00:58:164 (5) - you could unstack this since the pitch isn't the same as 00:57:878 (3,4) -
[Extra]
00:35:592 (1,3) - you could make those the smae distance as 00:35:736 (2,4,6,8) - to look like a hexgrid pattern? would be neater imo
00:37:307 (3,4) - these should be the same slider, as you usually do
00:51:592 (3,1) - probably swap those NCs since you NC'd 00:50:450 (1) -
01:00:021 (3,4,5,6,7) - you could move this to stack 6 on the sliderend
[Crabing]
00:06:307 (3,4) - these should be less spaced than 00:06:592 (5,6,7) - which are stronger sounds
00:10:450 (1) - i think this would make a much smoother movement if it was ctrl+g'd
00:31:021 (1,2,3) - how about making these different since you NC'd 1? or if you don't want to change it, how about removing the NC on 1?
00:53:307 (1) - this shouldn't be NC'd for consistency with your other diffs and because this isn't really significant as a sound
01:00:021 (3,4,5,6,7) - can you move this a bit so 7 doesn't overlap 2?
good luck!