forum

Our Stolen Theory - United (L.A.O.S Remix) [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
20
Topic Starter
hikiko-
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Monday, March 13, 2017 at 8:31:50 AM

Artist: Our Stolen Theory
Title: United (L.A.O.S Remix)
Tags: drum and bass dnb marathon
BPM: 175
Filesize: 8424kb
Play Time: 05:32
Difficulties Available:
  1. Eternity (5 stars, 2192 notes)
Download: Our Stolen Theory - United (L.A.O.S Remix)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
oh it's you and me
and we're lost souls who get burned
oh it's you and me
we just gotta be in love and learn

thanks modders!
  1. Raphalge
  2. Etsu
  3. Thousand
  4. Chromoxx
  5. OzzyOzrock
  6. Nwolf
Raphalge
eee pro mappers asking for noob mods.

[copying std diff names]
01:20:488 (349) - idk how you feel about sv changes, but adding a smooth increase on this stream would look really going going into the chorus imo
01:29:916 (424) - k? might ruin the simplicity theme of the section. If you change 01:31:288 (435) - to a d it might work
02:04:888 (704) - k? purely subjective. But it might be nice since you use a similar pattern later on at 02:46:888 (1049,1050,1051,1052,1053,1054) -
02:26:316 (878) - another spot when a smooth sv increase would look really cool
02:45:088 (1033) - k?
04:05:830 (458) - maybe a d is nicer? 04:27:773 (655) - maybe here too if you want it to be consistent
04:16:030 (549) - again with some smooth sv increases, do it for me pls c:
04:37:630 (750,751) - moving these two to 04:37:459 (748,749) - would definitely be nicer for players, I think it sounds alright too.
05:06:259 (978) - change to a k? It's the only time you end a pattern with k d d and it feels a bit out of place when playing.

now deny all these and speedrank this baby
Topic Starter
hikiko-
tysm for the mod!
changes

Raphalge wrote:

eee pro mappers asking for noob mods. hahah im not a pro mapper

[copying std diff names]
01:20:488 (349) - idk how you feel about sv changes, but adding a smooth increase on this stream would look really going going into the chorus imo in response to all the smooth sv comments, i'll put them before all the kiais (aka all the parts you marked lol)
01:29:916 (424) - k? might ruin the simplicity theme of the section. If you change 01:31:288 (435) - to a d it might work nice
02:04:888 (704) - k? purely subjective. But it might be nice since you use a similar pattern later on at 02:46:888 (1049,1050,1051,1052,1053,1054) - hm i see what you mean but this particular stream is meant to be relatively straightforward in comparison to some of the other ones
02:26:316 (878) - another spot when a smooth sv increase would look really cool
02:45:088 (1033) - k? there's already a kdk at 02:44:657 (1029,1030,1031) - so i don't want to make this dkd; additionally that would take away from the vocal kat emphasis in this section somewhat
04:05:830 (458) - maybe a d is nicer? 04:27:773 (655) - maybe here too if you want it to be consistent i use ........kkk on streams when i want to emphasize the finisher following it as the beginning of a new section, so imo these are fine
04:16:030 (549) - again with some smooth sv increases, do it for me pls c:
04:37:630 (750,751) - moving these two to 04:37:459 (748,749) - would definitely be nicer for players, I think it sounds alright too. oh that's rly cool, changed
05:06:259 (978) - change to a k? It's the only time you end a pattern with k d d and it feels a bit out of place when playing. both beats at 05:06:257 (978,979) - have the same kick drum so i did this on purpose

now deny all these and speedrank this baby
Etsu
Hello o/

Taiko mod request from my queue (NM)

[General]
Circle:
d = don - D = big don
k = kat - K = big kat

  1. -
[Infinite]
  1. 01:04:885 (231) - change k? similar sound in 01:05:057 (233) -
  2. 01:07:971 (255,256) - remove?
  3. 01:10:200 (273,274,275) - change kdk like 01:54:086 (612,613,614) - for consistency?
  4. 01:17:486 (324) - remove?
  5. 01:43:200 (530) - heard better with d imo
  6. 01:58:457 (644) - remove? o that sound follow? I would like to know why that stream there, it's too early to do that stream.. better something similar like
  7. 01:54:771 - imo
  8. 02:12:257 (762) - change k? feel better imo
  9. 02:33:428 (938) - change k like 02:27:943 (895) - ?
  10. 02:40:800 (996) - change d
  11. 02:43:714 - add a note for triple? heard sound there 1/4
  12. 03:03:171 - would put a d here for that sound 1/2 same next section
  13. 03:29:828 (145) - remove?
  14. 04:33:343 (705) - change d by that bass drum
  15. 04:55:286 (890) - ^
  16. 05:06:342 - missing note?
There is nothing more to say this map is well done for me, good job!
Todotrucks
Hi~ from here :D
I don't see anything wrong here but I can give some suggestions :3

Infinite
  • - 00:18:257 You can add a d
    - 00:21:000 ^ but k
    - 00:23:742 ^ d
    - 00:26:485 ^ k
    - 00:29:228 ^ d
    - 00:31:971 ^ k
    - 00:34:714 ^ d
    - 00:37:457 ^ k
    - 01:22:971 ^
    - 01:25:714 ^
    - 01:28:457 ^ d
    - 01:33:942 ^ k
    - 01:36:685 ^
    - 01:39:428 ^
    - 02:39:771 ^
    - 03:02:828 ^ d
    - 03:05:571 ^ k
    - 03:08:314 ^ d
    - 03:11:057 ^ k
    - 03:20:914 ^
    - 03:23:657 ^
    - 05:25:628 (1) - If here you are following the voice, you can put it on 05:25:285 to 05:32:142

That's all >3< since I'm new at this, they are just suggestions, what you accept or deny is up to you :) Good luck with ranking, it's a good map
Topic Starter
hikiko-
thanks for the mods!
changes

Etsu wrote:

Hello o/

Taiko mod request from my queue (NM)

[General]
Circle:
d = don - D = big don
k = kat - K = big kat

  1. -
[Infinite]
  1. 01:04:885 (231) - change k? similar sound in 01:05:057 (233) - it's already k?
  2. 01:07:971 (255,256) - remove? the way im structuring breaks is such that the latter four measures of every eight-measure phrase don't have 1/1 breaks
  3. 01:10:200 (273,274,275) - change kdk like 01:54:086 (612,613,614) - for consistency? im not too particular about consistency with regard to smaller patterns, this map would be so repetitive if everything were consistent lol. also 01:06:943 (246,247,248) - is already kdk so having this be kkk contributes to shaping the emphasis
  4. 01:17:486 (324) - remove? having 1/4 at the start of this bar brings out the 1/4 layer of the music that comes in here
  5. 01:43:200 (530) - heard better with d imo i see your point but in all three kiais i end with a series of ks, i feel like kkk provides better emphasis to the end of a section than kdk
  6. 01:58:457 (644) - remove? o that sound follow? I would like to know why that stream there, it's too early to do that stream.. better something similar like
  7. 01:54:771 - imo this is the start of a long density increasing section so kdddk is fine
  8. 02:12:257 (762) - change k? feel better imo i have some criteria for putting ks on downbeats - i only do them when the structure the downbeats provide would highlight a significant part of the map and this isn't one of them
  9. 02:33:428 (938) - change k like 02:27:943 (895) - ? this part has a lower chord in terms of pitch so this reflects that contrast
  10. 02:40:800 (996) - change d this is intentionally kkkkd to contrast from the kdkkds at 02:28:371 (898,899,900,901,902) - and 02:33:857 (941,942,943,944,945) - and allow for greater emphasis leading into a long buildup
  11. 02:43:714 - add a note for triple? heard sound there 1/4 sure
  12. 03:03:171 - would put a d here for that sound 1/2 same next section this entire section is meant to mirror the beginning exactly
  13. 03:29:828 (145) - remove? increasing stream density!
  14. 04:33:343 (705) - change d by that bass drum valid point, fixed
  15. 04:55:286 (890) - ^ fixed as well
  16. 05:06:342 - missing note? nope, this rhythmic structure is meant to be the same as the part in the beginning, with sparse 1/4 triplets
There is nothing more to say this map is well done for me, good job!

Thousand wrote:

Hi~ from here :D
I don't see anything wrong here but I can give some suggestions :3

[Infinite]
  • - 00:18:257 You can add a d
    - 00:21:000 ^ but k
    - 00:23:742 ^ d
    - 00:26:485 ^ k
    - 00:29:228 ^ d
    - 00:31:971 ^ k
    - 00:34:714 ^ d
    - 00:37:457 ^ k
    - 01:22:971 ^
    - 01:25:714 ^
    - 01:28:457 ^ d
    - 01:33:942 ^ k
    - 01:36:685 ^
    - 01:39:428 ^
    - 02:39:771 ^
    - 03:02:828 ^ d
    - 03:05:571 ^ k
    - 03:08:314 ^ d
    - 03:11:057 ^ k
    - 03:20:914 ^
    - 03:23:657 ^
    - 05:25:628 (1) - If here you are following the voice, you can put it on 05:25:285 to 05:32:142 good point, fixed
That's all >3< since I'm new at this, they are just suggestions, what you accept or deny is up to you :) Good luck with ranking, it's a good map
Chromoxx
and we're back again with another united.....

[Infinity]
OD6.5? DnB songs are pretty easy to acc in general, suggested 7 on Gezo's diff but 6.5 might be better here seeing as this is easier in general.
00:40:542 - maybe add a note here to emphasize the synth, could also make some variation with 00:41:914 - like having the first be d d k kkd the second being d k k dkd or something, would be cool
00:46:028 - same

that's about it, nice map :D
Topic Starter
hikiko-
hi! thanks for popping by
changes

Chromoxx wrote:

and we're back again with another united.....

[Infinity]
OD6.5? DnB songs are pretty easy to acc in general, suggested 7 on Gezo's diff but 6.5 might be better here seeing as this is easier in general. i changed it to od7, kinda like having a relatively simpler map be challenging in terms of acc
00:40:542 - maybe add a note here to emphasize the synth, could also make some variation with 00:41:914 - like having the first be d d k kkd the second being d k k dkd or something, would be cool i see your point but i prefer the rhythmic structure the way it is rn, with 1/1 breaks on the first and third measures of the phrase
00:46:028 - same ^

that's about it, nice map :D
Chromoxx
looks good, bubbled....
OzzyOzrock
^ Pour one out for the lad ^

[Infinite]
  1. 02:41:228 (1000,1001,1002,1003,1004,1005,1006,1007) - "ok so how haven't I varied this yet..."
  2. 03:52:371 - I liked this stream. That's it.
  3. 04:37:286 (746,747) - I think swapping these two lets the notes fall more nicely on the vocals. I can tell you're going for a k k k k feel, but in my opinion the ds present kinda make that intent hard to notice compared to one that more blatanly maps to it like, say, kdkdkkdd. Basically a "hey idk if you care about this but hi" kind of deal like every mod I make on your maps.
IT'S A MOD. I GUESS. TAKE YOUR BUBBLE ALREADY.
Ascendance

OzzyOzrock wrote:

^ Pour one out for the lad ^

[Infinite]
  1. 02:41:228 (1000,1001,1002,1003,1004,1005,1006,1007) - "ok so how haven't I varied this yet..." I am a master of copy paste, I don't think I need to vary this at all.
  2. 03:52:371 - I liked this stream. That's it. I didn't
  3. 04:37:286 (746,747) - I think swapping these two lets the notes fall more nicely on the vocals. I can tell you're going for a k k k k feel, but in my opinion the ds present kinda make that intent hard to notice compared to one that more blatanly maps to it like, say, kdkdkkdd. Basically a "hey idk if you care about this but hi" kind of deal like every mod I make on your maps. Not really a fan of this suggestion...
IT'S A MOD. I GUESS. TAKE YOUR BUBBLE ALREADY.
Thanks!

https://puu.sh/ulEZi/2b11d25bb2.rar
OzzyOzrock
i saw that coming
Topic Starter
hikiko-
hello there
actual reply inc
changes

OzzyOzrock wrote:

^ Pour one out for the lad ^

[Infinite]
  1. 02:41:228 (1000,1001,1002,1003,1004,1005,1006,1007) - "ok so how haven't I varied this yet..." :thinking: im pretty sure i had reasoning for that back when i mapped it so im keeping it
  2. 03:52:371 - I liked this stream. That's it. thx lol
  3. 04:37:286 (746,747) - I think swapping these two lets the notes fall more nicely on the vocals. I can tell you're going for a k k k k feel, but in my opinion the ds present kinda make that intent hard to notice compared to one that more blatanly maps to it like, say, kdkdkkdd. Basically a "hey idk if you care about this but hi" kind of deal like every mod I make on your maps. ya i see what you mean, the stream itself actually doesn't play badly tho so w/e (i was surprised too when i mapped it lol)
IT'S A MOD. I GUESS. TAKE YOUR BUBBLE ALREADY.
o ya and i changed the diffname bc apparently infinite is too uncreative
OzzyOzrock
Bubble #2!
Yuzeyun
Topic Starter
hikiko-

Unmei Muma wrote:

heres a random mod

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulo_operation

-bye-
our maps are united modulo 0.19*!
Nwolf
a woof
des canapes

[Eternity]

01:53:057 (605) - 01:58:543 (645) - are the only spots outside kiai (in parts like this at least) where the downbeat is not mapped as don. Might be a bit nitpicking from my side but I think it would be nicer if you change these two patterns to allow dons anyway, it doesn't play bad but it might play even better!
> 03:42:771 (256) - ok I lied this too

03:48:257 (300,301,302,303,304) - This one feels generally odd. It adds to above (kat on downbeat) but it also is quite a rhythm-breaker by being the only 5-plet that starts there, instead of 03:47:914 - starting here and ending on 03:48:257 - .

03:59:914 (408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416) - Ok maybe this really is nitpicky but this feels odd to me, it's a sudden 9-plet which doesn't appear (from what I've seen) anywhere outside more streamy or kiai sections. Also doesn't appear 04:10:542 - here (for example), so I'd just cut down the 9-plet to a 5- or 7-plet for consistency.
Topic Starter
hikiko-
thanks for the mod!!
changes

Nwolf wrote:

[Eternity]

01:53:057 (605) - 01:58:543 (645) - are the only spots outside kiai (in parts like this at least) where the downbeat is not mapped as don. Might be a bit nitpicking from my side but I think it would be nicer if you change these two patterns to allow dons anyway, it doesn't play bad but it might play even better! changed around things for both, pls check
> 03:42:771 (256) - ok I lied this too im going to keep this one, this section in general has a stronger vocal melody imo so i used more kat emphasis. this is consistent with kat placement @ 03:53:743 (355) - in the stream, used to be consistent with 03:48:257 (300) - but i changed that per the next point

03:48:257 (300,301,302,303,304) - This one feels generally odd. It adds to above (kat on downbeat) but it also is quite a rhythm-breaker by being the only 5-plet that starts there, instead of 03:47:914 - starting here and ending on 03:48:257 - . fixed

03:59:914 (408,409,410,411,412,413,414,415,416) - Ok maybe this really is nitpicky but this feels odd to me, it's a sudden 9-plet which doesn't appear (from what I've seen) anywhere outside more streamy or kiai sections. Also doesn't appear 04:10:542 - here (for example), so I'd just cut down the 9-plet to a 5- or 7-plet for consistency. done
Nwolf
And soon you will be united with Unmei Muma in ranked section
Surono
wew gz!1!!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply