1. Collapsing (1.38 stars, 174 notes)
2. Easy (1.08 stars, 150 notes)

Firetruck wrote:

3 MIN OF HOT YOONGI

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Firetruck wrote:

3 MIN OF HOT YOONGI

No wonder why I used an anime BG

Bara- wrote:

Did timing and such
kd please

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Bara- wrote:

Did timing and such
kd please

Rank first and I'll give you kds. xD

Firetruck wrote:

u fukkin weeb kys cunt

Lapis Aoki wrote:

Firetruck wrote:

u fukkin weeb kys cunt

1. 00:57:166 (2,1,2) - tbh I don't really like this pattern, it's because 00:57:166 (2,2) - are overlapping and there are just the same + blanket here 00:59:452 (1,2) needs little touching up. Maybe think of changing it? I made an example of a diffrent pattern but naturally make one you like (in this example I snapped notes to make the whole pattern visible, the thing is about spacing)
   
2. The same situation is in: 02:10:322 (2,1,2) - 03:07:476 (3,1,2) - Maybe it's intentional, but it really doesn't look good imo
3. Ctrl + A = as you can see there wasn't used all of the mapping space. The whole diff is good and it's personal though maybe consider a little remapping? To make the player more moving on the whole screen

1. 00:35:733 (3) - ok I get it, it's nice wooah here, but I'd remove this note since there's no music right there
2. 03:07:477 (3) - Nice idea for a slider though make it better. I reccomend you to use red slider tick in the middle and then customize it and make a perfect s-shaped slider plz
3. Generally nice diff, I like it c;

Loony wrote:

Dear tasty subway sandwich, I love you sooo here I am ~ quick mod from #modreqs Thank you bighit for making a boy group that has a weird name.
[Calm]

1. 00:57:166 (2,1,2) - tbh I don't really like this pattern, it's because 00:57:166 (2,2) - are overlapping and there are just the same + blanket here 00:59:452 (1,2) needs little touching up. Maybe think of changing it? I made an example of a diffrent pattern but naturally make one you like (in this example I snapped notes to make the whole pattern visible, the thing is about spacing)
   
2. The same situation is in: 02:10:322 (2,1,2) - 03:07:476 (3,1,2) - Maybe it's intentional, but it really doesn't look good imo I only fixed the blankets here. I'm not sure, but, the pattern here seems fine for me. But, maybe if a few other people complained about, I might remap it.
3. Ctrl + A = as you can see there wasn't used all of the mapping space. The whole diff is good and it's personal though maybe consider a little remapping? To make the player more moving on the whole screen I did that because the BPM is too low. And, this diff is rather for beginners (because of the low BPM). So, I didn't really want to confuse them with different patterns there and there. That's pretty much why I copied and pasted some stuff. I could remap though, if a huge amount of people complained.

[Collapsing]

1. 00:35:733 (3) - ok I get it, it's nice wooah here, but I'd remove this note since there's no music right there There's a vocal in the background which goes "fall" or something like that. So, I'll keep it.
2. 03:07:477 (3) - Nice idea for a slider though make it better. I reccomend you to use red slider tick in the middle and then customize it and make a perfect s-shaped slider plz Thanks for pointing out this slider, I totally forgot to change it lol. Anyways, I did something else instead. Because, making a perfect S shape would be impossible, since it would kill the blanket with (1)'s head.
3. Generally nice diff, I like it c;

Since it's a short mod won't be angry if you don't give kds - especially when nothing was useful here lol
good luck!

Lily Bread wrote:

M4M

[calm]
03:02:904 (1) - this? because - 03:04:619 (2) - is strong. Fixed.
http://puu.sh/qV5Ls/79fc47552a.jpg

[Collapsing]
can't find any issue.

so i will shoot you a star.
simple and solid set, good luck!

Cerulean Veyron wrote:

If you want to be hot yoongi, you can't
You are not hot yoongi
You'll never be hot yoongi
Stop trying

And make this map a sandwich for newbie players B-)
/BigHit Entertainment copyright strikes

Lilyanna wrote:

Hi from my CuteQueue

calm:

01:00:595 - pause here and blanket 00:59:452 (1,2) - will look better I don't get it.. Isn't there already a perfect blanket here..?
01:51:461 (2) - there is nothing here to map its same as here 01:53:748 - and here u didnt add note Fixed.
02:12:608 (1,2) - same as above -
03:09:762 (1,2) - ^ ^
03:14:334 (1,2) - feels repetetive i personaly dont like straight sliders like that maybe be more creative with the patterns even tho its low bpm and nothing much u do but copy paste patterns feels dull I personally think it's okay.

collapsing:

00:34:305 (2,3) - this 1/4 snap may be confusing not sure It seems fine.
00:54:880 (1,2,3) - doesnt look appealing imo maybe 00:54:880 (1,2) - blanket and unstack 00:54:880 (1,3) - move this 00:57:166 (3) - to x141 y140 it also give better flow I'm gonna keep it like this unless someone else points it out.
01:06:311 (3,4) - why not paralelle I've used many parallel sliders here. So, I decided to change a bit.
01:41:746 (2) - make the 2 white nodes symetrical for better looking slider Fixed.

I am a box

02:42:329 (1) - u nc ever 4beats maybe remove nc here I added an NC here because it's a high note. And, because slider ends at 02:44:615 -
same what happen here 03:05:190 (1) - remove nc 03:07:477 (3) - nc on downbeats 03:09:763 (1) - remove nc and so on It'd ruin the NC consistency.
overall its nice map but u could have used bigger spacing in this diff to try make it "harder" u use 1/2 ds in both diff. Well, this is a low BPM. I think it'd be hard to increase spacing and make jumps here.

Good luck

-Dave Strider- wrote:

m4m from my queue!

general

-why is only the last chorus kiai? Because of the high note. Plus, because of the previous kiai.
--the last kiai should end at 03:23:480 No.. After 03:14:335 it sounds like every other chorus.

Calm

-00:43:449 (3) - I'd move this so that the beginning is right under 00:42:878 (2) This slider is stacked with 00:38:877's head. Plus, I want to avoid making stacks in this diff.
-00:52:022 (2,3) - ^ ^ Except that it's not stacked with 00:48:021's head, because DS.
-00:49:736 (3) - i'd move this to x:376 y:128 Moved.
-01:40:031 - add a note here? Added.
-01:51:462 - ^ I already added a note when the vocal goes "No way". So, I'd rather not add a note here.
-02:00:607 - ^ ^

Collapsing

-00:35:733 (3) - this doesn't make much sense to me :/ Not sure, I wanna keep this because of the vocal going "fall". Besides, here at 01:48:890 it's pretty much the same case, except that vocal goes "I'm okay", yet, no one pointed it out. I'm gonna keep it like this until someone else points it out.
-00:58:309 (4,1) - probably a nitpick but make sure these don't overlap I intentionally made an overlap here.
-01:56:606 (3) - i don't think this should be crooked Why? I think it looks fine.

good luck! i really like this song ;w; ♥

Kaitjuh wrote:

from queue o/

Mod for ants

Calm

• 
  01:37:745 (2,4) - Overlaps in Easy don't look very nice, try to rearrange this Ah, my bad. Fixed.

Collapsing

1. 00:54:880 (1,2) - Blanket? It's doesn't look as nice atm Fixed.
2. 01:06:311 (3,4) - Better to make these parallel to each other, bc this doesn't look very nice I think I'm gonna this for now.
3. 00:58:309 (4,1) - Overlaps can look nice and structured, but these sliders are just barely overlapping which doesn't look good imo, maybe move 00:59:452 (1) - slightly upwards? Fixed.

No real problems with rhythm so, mostly about placements

Good Luck~

KittyAdventure wrote:

What, the real man? owo

TenkaiPalm wrote:

Hi there :> Yaaaaayy K-POP~ Was actually planning on doing a K-pop map next

I'm not sure there's much for me to say since this is low diff, and it seems fine as is~

Calm
02:07:465 - Maybe place a note here? No, because the chorus is going to start.
03:18:907 (1,2,1) - Isn't this a copy paste from here? 02:21:753 (1,2,1) - Could try re-arranging it~ The chorus was basically a copy-paste.

Collapsing
00:26:875 (4) - This.. is kind of odd. (?) I might keep this for now.
00:56:595 (2,3) - This kinda looks like an odd flow, your choice to change tho, it doesn't exactly affect gameplay I suppose~ Looks fine to me.
01:48:890 - Kind of like above^ Maybe a repeat slider idk. I'm not sure what'd I would change it to. Eh.. I don't get it, this one looks fine too.
02:35:470 - Could just make this a kiai instead of a tiny one for the fountain. Sounds like it could be a kiai too Hmm.. Sure.

General~
What's up with that odd BPM tho (52.49) I suppose it works, but it's still weird It does look weird. But, making it 52 or 53 would sound really off.

This seems fine


Good luck ranking~

DaTopBull wrote:

Hello from my modding queue ^^ I'm going to go from hardest to easiest since that's the type of weird person I am

General things

I don't know if this is something many people do, but for my slower songs and easier difficulties, I usually try to mold the sliders so that they 'bend' along with the BPM if you know what I'm trying to say. For example, instead of what you have now for a slider in Collapsing at 03:05:190 (1), I would make some sort of bend/loop thing right at 03:05:762. I don't know. It's just something that I like to do that I think gives a map more depth >_< I dunno. For me, it looks fine at it. I might do something like that if more people suggested it.

Collapsing

00:36:019
Another circle could be placed here since whatever the singer is saying sounds like it goes past the note you placed at 00:35:733 (3) Sure, added.

01:49:176 - 01:49:462
Two additional notes or a single slider could be placed at these two timing points. For me, it made the song sound smoother since it's kind of a faster part of the song there. Added here as well.


Calm

I honestly couldn't find anything wrong with this difficulty. Well done

1. Change soft-hitwhistle2.mp3 to .wav format? eh
2. 02:08:037 - increase hs volume here , because the song gets alot louder here than the whole previous thingy or whateves , maybe 85% would work here

1. 00:18:302 (1) - add whistle on head ? i checked the whole map and saw that u used whistles for kick/bass sounds so the sliderhead here also supports a kick sound with a drum sound so ye should add whistle and let finish be there
2. 00:54:880 - same here
3. 01:10:883 (2,1) - could make the flow less aggressive here , i dont see any reason for a flow like this to mapped at a calm part like this .w.
4. 01:31:458 - same whistle thing
5. 02:08:037 - ^
6. 02:35:470 - ^
7. 02:44:615 - 100% vol is too loud here .-. decrease it
8. 02:42:329 (1) - if u listen at low playback or 100% playback if u have gud ear u will notice that the vocal starts fadding at 02:44:758 - (1/8th tick) so u should rather finish the spinner there or something
9. 03:03:476 - you are ignoring a very important loud drum+snare sound here , u could rather just replace 03:02:904 (1) - with a 1/2 repeat slider
10. 03:05:190 - whistle? ;w;

1. Check the same whistle thingies if u agree to add them in previous diff
2. 00:47:450 - why u skip this while u map 00:38:305 - Arent both sounds exactly the same? ;n; i literally cant tell any difference between them
3. 01:07:454 (4) - copy and paste 01:06:311 - ? will be more consistent with your other patterns and visuals would look alot more cleaner
4. 01:38:317 (3) - ok in your easier diff , the red tick 01:38:888 - is mapped while in this diff its only supported by sliderslide? makes no sense tbh .-. should have a note that supports the sound at the red tick , other wise it feels kinda empty since the vocals are getting pretty intense and the rhythm of this diff becomes easier than your easier diff
5. 01:47:461 (3,4,5,6) - pretty dense pattern actually where u dont need so many circles , i mean this part is way way way less intenser than 01:36:031 - and the rhythm is denser is less intense part .w. either make the rhythm complexer at 01:36:031 - or delete the circles at blue tick at 01:48:604 -
6. 02:06:894 (4) - this should have some kind of variation or atleast it shouldnt be exactly same as 02:05:751 (3) - , right? becos the pitch at 02:06:894 - gets alot more intenser here and to emphasize it properly u should better map a less boring slider here instead of just a linear slider , i m talking about (4)
7. 02:26:326 - 100% volume? ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i dont understand , the song gets twice as relaxing as before and instead of decreasing volume , u increased it instead?
8. 02:42:329 (1) - same thing as in the previous diff but here with the slider , shouldnt it finish at the 1/8th tick?

DeRandom Otaku wrote:

Bee Tee Ess Behind The Scenes
[General]

1. Change soft-hitwhistle2.mp3 to .wav format? eh Uh, what the.. Sorry, fixed.
2. 02:08:037 - increase hs volume here , because the song gets alot louder here than the whole previous thingy or whateves , maybe 85% would work here I'm not sure.. I know that at the chorus it gets louder. But, I don't want to make the volume high. (I know, I made it 100% on the clock tick thingy part, but, that's because it's hard to hear it.)

[Calm]

1. 00:18:302 (1) - add whistle on head ? i checked the whole map and saw that u used whistles for kick/bass sounds so the sliderhead here also supports a kick sound with a drum sound so ye should add whistle and let finish be there Not sure, I didn't add a whistle here, because the vocals start from here. Besides, I feel like if I added a whistle here, it'd feel like I'm overusing whistles..
2. 00:54:880 - same here Chorus starts. And, pretty much as said above.
3. 01:10:883 (2,1) - could make the flow less aggressive here , i dont see any reason for a flow like this to mapped at a calm part like this .w. Uhh.. I don't get it. ><
4. 01:31:458 - same whistle thing -
5. 02:08:037 - ^ ^
6. 02:35:470 - ^ ^
7. 02:44:615 - 100% vol is too loud here .-. decrease it Well, I said that it's 100% because it feels like that the clock tick is loud. But, anyways, decreased. I feel like someone else would complain about this.
8. 02:42:329 (1) - if u listen at low playback or 100% playback if u have gud ear u will notice that the vocal starts fadding at 02:44:758 - (1/8th tick) so u should rather finish the spinner there or something I don't follow vocals.
9. 03:03:476 - you are ignoring a very important loud drum+snare sound here , u could rather just replace 03:02:904 (1) - with a 1/2 repeat slider Pretty much did something else.
10. 03:05:190 - whistle? ;w; -

[Collapsing]

1. Check the same whistle thingies if u agree to add them in previous diff ---
2. 00:47:450 - why u skip this while u map 00:38:305 - Arent both sounds exactly the same? ;n; i literally cant tell any difference between them Uhh, sorry about that.. Added a note here.
3. 01:07:454 (4) - copy and paste 01:06:311 - ? will be more consistent with your other patterns and visuals would look alot more cleaner Fixed.
4. 01:38:317 (3) - ok in your easier diff , the red tick 01:38:888 - is mapped while in this diff its only supported by sliderslide? makes no sense tbh .-. should have a note that supports the sound at the red tick , other wise it feels kinda empty since the vocals are getting pretty intense and the rhythm of this diff becomes easier than your easier diff My bad, fixed.
5. 01:47:461 (3,4,5,6) - pretty dense pattern actually where u dont need so many circles , i mean this part is way way way less intenser than 01:36:031 - and the rhythm is denser is less intense part .w. either make the rhythm complexer at 01:36:031 - or delete the circles at blue tick at 01:48:604 - Removed the third circle. Just to make it exactly like 00:34:305 (2,3,4) -
6. 02:06:894 (4) - this should have some kind of variation or atleast it shouldnt be exactly same as 02:05:751 (3) - , right? becos the pitch at 02:06:894 - gets alot more intenser here and to emphasize it properly u should better map a less boring slider here instead of just a linear slider , i m talking about (4) Not sure, if I changed the slider shape here, it'd ruin the flow with the next slider. So, I'll keep it.
7. 02:26:326 - 100% volume? ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i dont understand , the song gets twice as relaxing as before and instead of decreasing volume , u increased it instead? -----
8. 02:42:329 (1) - same thing as in the previous diff but here with the slider , shouldnt it finish at the 1/8th tick? ----

ok thats a weirdly short and nazi mod right there , sorry for the terribleness but the map is solid af
my map : https://osu.ppy.sh/s/503216 ? u dont really have to mod it but whateves
gl gl

William K wrote:

Hi, NM from my queue.

[Easy]

1. 00:43:449 (3) - I hope you can do some curvy slider here since the sound feels like curving. Why? I think it still looks good as a straight slider.
2. 00:20:016 (2,2,3,2,3,2) - How about making these consistent with the others since it's easy with erasing those or adding notes every time (But if you do this it'd be too hard imo, consider deleting those.) I added those notes because of the water (?) sound thingy in the background.
3. 03:05:190 - Consider making this part's volume louder since it sounds more intense than the others. Sure

I can't find anything much orz. I'm not good at easies. I think AR 1.5 would be better than 1.2 since it's a slow song. And consider reducing stack leniency for easies. Good Luck~ :3 IMO, makes no sense saying that "AR 1.5 is better than 1.2 because it's slow" but, I think is 1.2 AR is fine. So, I'm gonna keep it.

1. r u sure, 52.49 bpm? try to ask someone who's good in timing :/

1. suspicious improper blankets
2. 00:24:017 (2,3) - i sense a fishy improper double blankets here
3. 00:38:877 (3,4) - yoo this one too
4. 00:54:880 (1,2) - ^
5. 01:06:311 (3) - would be cool if u stack at 01:04:024 (1) - (just ignore the DS spacing anyway. it's still 1.2x DX ya know in estimation)
6. 01:08:597 (1,2) - ^
7. 01:22:314 (1) - stacking this would be rly confusing for a newbie players
8. 01:28:029 (2,3) - fishy blanket
9. 01:34:888 (4,1) - ^
10. 02:13:752 (2,3) - ^

1. no

lit120 wrote:

oh hi

[general]

1. r u sure, 52.49 bpm? try to ask someone who's good in timing :/ I don't really know what's wrong with this BPM. I mean, it actually sounds good. Besides, a BN already checked the timing. So, I guess it should be fine.

[collapsing]

1. suspicious improper blankets I've looked through the whole mapset. And, the blankets look fine to me.
2. 00:24:017 (2,3) - i sense a fishy improper double blankets here I.. It looks fine?
3. 00:38:877 (3,4) - yoo this one too ---
4. 00:54:880 (1,2) - ^ ^
5. 01:06:311 (3) - would be cool if u stack at 01:04:024 (1) - (just ignore the DS spacing anyway. it's still 1.2x DX ya know in estimation) Ooo, derp. Fixed.
6. 01:08:597 (1,2) - ^ ^
7. 01:22:314 (1) - stacking this would be rly confusing for a newbie players I dunno, I've heard that stacking isn't much of a problem in easy. I might unstack those if someone else suggested it.
8. 01:28:029 (2,3) - fishy blanket ..
9. 01:34:888 (4,1) - ^ ^
10. 02:13:752 (2,3) - ^ ----

[easy]

1. no Weee~

that's all