forum

Top 100 for every map

posted
Total Posts
47
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +76
Topic Starter
Sakary
Due to the growing population of osu! players, maybe it's time to show the hundred best players of every beatmap.
Trash Boat
mmm.. not bad idea. lets see what the rest say
deadbeat
there was top 400 which that got removed. personally i think top 50 is fine
WingSilent
100 would be more fine then.
~Star
buny
completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
Lust
if you cant get in to the top 50, then focus on improving your play rather than focusing on getting high ranks so that top 50s come naturally
TheVileOne
I agree. It is very difficult to get in the top 50 on standard ranking list. You need at least a 2 Mod FC to get in the top 50 on the average map that's not unreasonably hard to play with two mods. If peppy is interested in creating a more newbie friendly environment, then it would be a good thing to consider this idea as it will make newbie players feel more important when they get a good rank, and will make them feel like the road to making it to a top list spot is more achievable.
Myke B

buny wrote:

completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
Trash Boat

Myke B wrote:

I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
em, money?
buny

Trash Boat wrote:

Myke B wrote:

I agree, plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money. Not sure how much more space though.
em, money?
i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved

honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
Winek
I totally agree. *star*

(Most of the time i land around #80 :cry: )
Bauxe
Won't people then just keep asking for more and more scores to be displayed if this is implemented?
yurunneram
I'm pretty sure peppy allows only 50 cuz most people have slow computers and increasing the rank feed for every single song you have downloaded would kill most of the computers ._.
deadbeat

Myke B wrote:

plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :p

buny wrote:

honestly though, people don't even check the top 50
i don't know about everyone, but i barely ever look past the top 8 on the global scoreboard. quite close to just denying this request to be honest :(
buny

deadbeat wrote:

Myke B wrote:

plus that means more replays, which requires more space and money
Simple solution would be to not have ranks 51-100 have an online replay :p
there's no point of it being in the global rankings for everybody to see if you can't watch the replay though
Myke B

Buny wrote:

i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved

honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
Exactly this, I don't think enough people look past top 8 lol, but I guess we'll let the stars decide.
NixXSkate

Myke B wrote:

Buny wrote:

i'm guessing if peppy implemented this and planned to save replays, the server storage would have to be increased a lot as there are going to be 2x more replays saved

honestly though, people don't even check the top 50, and top 100 will just devalue the worth of a top score
Exactly this, I don't think enough people look past top 8 lol, but I guess we'll let the stars decide.
osu! is growing though, yet the high score list has only moved from 40 to 50 despite its massive growth of users over time.
The value of getting a top score has increased heavily from 2011.
Topic Starter
Sakary

buny wrote:

completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!
-Koquer
I totally agree! PEPPY IMPLEMENT THIS PLEASE
twwprod
(I want to give you star, but I don't have one) I really need this!
-Shawie-
Top 100 would be fair.
Myke B
osu! is growing though, yet the high score list has only moved from 40 to 50 despite its massive growth of users over time.
The value of getting a top score has increased heavily from 2011.
yea, but most of the top 50 replays on maps today are all the same mods, DTHD or HDHR. It would just be 50 more of the same replay really lol. Unless people start getting really good, and can do HDHRDT on a lot of maps, then I don't see this changing.
Bauxe

Hi_Hello wrote:

buny wrote:

completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!
If you can't get top 50, you probably can't get top 100 either.
buny

Hi_Hello wrote:

buny wrote:

completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod
Its easy alright. But how about those people who can't go to the top 50, especially the newbie once. GIVE CHANCE TO OTHERS!
why not put a handicap on every map also?
top 50s need to be worked for, not for everybody to have.

when there are more players there is also more competition
Mira-san
I honestly thought this was for web only.

I think it's better if the top 50 remained in-game and the top 100 can be shown on the map's page.
deadbeat
other alternate is using the Global Ranking (Selected Mods) options
Samui_old_1
I don't think this is necessary, unless if osu!Bancho can handle load that is required for top 100.

Each top 50 global ranking load in-game uses approximately 1.5Mb of internet usage, while other types of ranking uses less to none.
If it is moved to top 100, then that load would double, including how many more replays will be saved to the server.
YunoFanatic
Completely useless. You will barely feel bad if you ranked #100 -_- like come on. It is a bit depressing for you to get in top #100 of the map. Plus, if you cant get in to the top #50 of the map. Then your not worth for the rank in the map. Suggest to practice more. And ftw this is another way to compete! People dont wanna placed on a #100 rank in a map oh c'mon guys top #100 seriously? Raise your foot if you want to be placed on top #100 in a map. People probably want to place higher in the maps ranking, But to do that, that means hardwork and practice. Do you think people placing rank #10 #30 #45 just a newbie ? Ofc not they practice so they are worth placing to that rank. Please bare with it.

Also there's a bright side in this request. That is IF peppy want to be more environment friendly in this game.
Topic Starter
Sakary
You know that this is only a suggestion. Don't be mad at me.
Topic Starter
Sakary
If you don't agree with this, well that's ok. Its only a suggestion.
Yukiteru Amano
It really isn't that hard to get into top 50. It's meant to be a challenge, the purpose of top 50 is to show the best. not the mediocre.
Heinzen

buny wrote:

completely unnecessary. If you can't get a score in the top 50 then you don't deserve to have your score publicised in global rankings

personally i think top 50 is easy enough as it is because most maps you can get into it with just 1 mod

Double that. Took me 6 months to consistenly get top50s. It's not hard if you practice
Myke B

Yukiteru Amano wrote:

It really isn't that hard to get into top 50. It's meant to be a challenge, the purpose of top 50 is to show the best. not the mediocre.
Yea.. maybe on an easy difficulty with low play count lol.
MrBakpao
i think it's better top 50 so it's look not comlicated

but actually top 100 its look not bad, because it could be some player got top 100 rank with some beatmap~
Karuta-_old_1
I would usually scroll for the play I wanted to watch, rank doesn't matter
Top 50 is enough, it's also closer to first rank, if the pros wanted to 1# it

Remembers the feeling of beating someone in the top 50 a long time ago.
Audiodelus
While it's a legit idea, I think it's more of an issue of that effort could be placed elsewhere for more pressing matters.
Not everyone scrolls down past top 8 anyway unless their checking for someone.

Generally I find if someone can make it into top 100, then can break top 50. They just need more Acc or maybe HD. Both possible with a few more tries. (Unless it's a really popular map. Tough luck.)

Showing more on the map's page couldn't hurt though.
Varetyr
I honestly don't get the point of this suggestion, why would a competitive leaderboard would have to be more "newbie-friendly" anyway ?
There's the word "LEADER" in "leaderboard", it's not just a "ranking list". You just have to work hard if you want to reach it.
Not to mention the other rankings (selected mods, national) are already there if you're really craving for fame if it's just about self-esteem.

I dunno, I just can't picture myself going to my local arcade, asking to show the top 20+ scores instead of top 10, just because I can't reach them. I would just practice until I'd be part of that top, which feels much more rewarding.
shawchaneo
I think top 50 is enough, game is more competitive :D
Trash Boat
how about top 25?
RaneFire

Yukiteru Amano wrote:

It really isn't that hard to get into top 50. It's meant to be a challenge, the purpose of top 50 is to show the best. not the mediocre.
Quoting for justice.

Hate to be a party pooper, but there really is no point in having more than the top50 if it's just going to be filled up with more similar scores/replays to what's already there. The main purpose of the top50 is for the replays. That said, I do find the supporter-only feature for friends/country ranks as probably the strongest reason to become a supporter. I like seeing where others, at similar skill levels to me, are having trouble or excelling. But if I was really interested in a particular score, I'd try ask them for their replay.

I would sooner see replays saved on a per-mod basis so that we can have more diversity to watch. There is no point in seeing more of the same, especially on maps where the top50 is filled with HD+DT 99-100%'s... Guaranteed the 51-100 will just have more HD+DT 98-99%. I generally do not look past the top10, unless there is a different mod combination below.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply